Cargando…

Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait

Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors are widely used for motion analysis in sports and rehabilitation. The attachment of IMU sensors to predefined body segments and sides (left/right) is complex, time-consuming, and error-prone. Methods for solving the IMU-2-segment (I2S) pairing work properly on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baniasad, Mina, Martin, Robin, Crevoisier, Xavier, Pichonnaz, Claude, Becce, Fabio, Aminian, Kamiar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073587
_version_ 1785024903573929984
author Baniasad, Mina
Martin, Robin
Crevoisier, Xavier
Pichonnaz, Claude
Becce, Fabio
Aminian, Kamiar
author_facet Baniasad, Mina
Martin, Robin
Crevoisier, Xavier
Pichonnaz, Claude
Becce, Fabio
Aminian, Kamiar
author_sort Baniasad, Mina
collection PubMed
description Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors are widely used for motion analysis in sports and rehabilitation. The attachment of IMU sensors to predefined body segments and sides (left/right) is complex, time-consuming, and error-prone. Methods for solving the IMU-2-segment (I2S) pairing work properly only for a limited range of gait speeds or require a similar sensor configuration. Our goal was to propose an algorithm that works over a wide range of gait speeds with different sensor configurations while being robust to footwear type and generalizable to pathologic gait patterns. Eight IMU sensors were attached to both feet, shanks, thighs, sacrum, and trunk, and 12 healthy subjects (training dataset) and 22 patients (test dataset) with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis walked at different speeds with/without insole. First, the mean stride time was estimated and IMU signals were scaled. Using a decision tree, the body segment was recognized, followed by the side of the lower limb sensor. The accuracy and precision of the whole algorithm were 99.7% and 99.0%, respectively, for gait speeds ranging from 0.5 to 2.2 m/s. In conclusion, the proposed algorithm was robust to gait speed and footwear type and can be widely used for different sensor configurations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100988092023-04-14 Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait Baniasad, Mina Martin, Robin Crevoisier, Xavier Pichonnaz, Claude Becce, Fabio Aminian, Kamiar Sensors (Basel) Article Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors are widely used for motion analysis in sports and rehabilitation. The attachment of IMU sensors to predefined body segments and sides (left/right) is complex, time-consuming, and error-prone. Methods for solving the IMU-2-segment (I2S) pairing work properly only for a limited range of gait speeds or require a similar sensor configuration. Our goal was to propose an algorithm that works over a wide range of gait speeds with different sensor configurations while being robust to footwear type and generalizable to pathologic gait patterns. Eight IMU sensors were attached to both feet, shanks, thighs, sacrum, and trunk, and 12 healthy subjects (training dataset) and 22 patients (test dataset) with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis walked at different speeds with/without insole. First, the mean stride time was estimated and IMU signals were scaled. Using a decision tree, the body segment was recognized, followed by the side of the lower limb sensor. The accuracy and precision of the whole algorithm were 99.7% and 99.0%, respectively, for gait speeds ranging from 0.5 to 2.2 m/s. In conclusion, the proposed algorithm was robust to gait speed and footwear type and can be widely used for different sensor configurations. MDPI 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10098809/ /pubmed/37050647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073587 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Baniasad, Mina
Martin, Robin
Crevoisier, Xavier
Pichonnaz, Claude
Becce, Fabio
Aminian, Kamiar
Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait
title Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait
title_full Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait
title_fullStr Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait
title_short Automatic Body Segment and Side Recognition of an Inertial Measurement Unit Sensor during Gait
title_sort automatic body segment and side recognition of an inertial measurement unit sensor during gait
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37050647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23073587
work_keys_str_mv AT baniasadmina automaticbodysegmentandsiderecognitionofaninertialmeasurementunitsensorduringgait
AT martinrobin automaticbodysegmentandsiderecognitionofaninertialmeasurementunitsensorduringgait
AT crevoisierxavier automaticbodysegmentandsiderecognitionofaninertialmeasurementunitsensorduringgait
AT pichonnazclaude automaticbodysegmentandsiderecognitionofaninertialmeasurementunitsensorduringgait
AT beccefabio automaticbodysegmentandsiderecognitionofaninertialmeasurementunitsensorduringgait
AT aminiankamiar automaticbodysegmentandsiderecognitionofaninertialmeasurementunitsensorduringgait