Cargando…

Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data

Phase II/III clinical trials are efficient two‐stage designs that test multiple experimental treatments. In stage 1, patients are allocated to the control and all experimental treatments, with the data collected from them used to select experimental treatments to continue to stage 2. Patients recrui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khan, Josephine N., Kimani, Peter K., Glimm, Ekkehard, Stallard, Nigel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.9606
_version_ 1785024919229169664
author Khan, Josephine N.
Kimani, Peter K.
Glimm, Ekkehard
Stallard, Nigel
author_facet Khan, Josephine N.
Kimani, Peter K.
Glimm, Ekkehard
Stallard, Nigel
author_sort Khan, Josephine N.
collection PubMed
description Phase II/III clinical trials are efficient two‐stage designs that test multiple experimental treatments. In stage 1, patients are allocated to the control and all experimental treatments, with the data collected from them used to select experimental treatments to continue to stage 2. Patients recruited in stage 2 are allocated to the selected treatments and the control. Combined data of stage 1 and stage 2 are used for a confirmatory phase III analysis. Appropriate analysis needs to adjust for selection bias of the stage 1 data. Point estimators exist for normally distributed outcome data. Extending these estimators to time to event data is not straightforward because treatment selection is based on correlated treatment effects and stage 1 patients who do not get events in stage 1 are followed‐up in stage 2. We have derived an approximately uniformly minimum variance conditional unbiased estimator (UMVCUE) and compared its biases and mean squared errors to existing bias adjusted estimators. In simulations, one existing bias adjusted estimator has similar properties as the practically unbiased UMVCUE while the others can have noticeable biases but they are less variable than the UMVCUE. For confirmatory phase II/III clinical trials where unbiased estimators are desired, we recommend the UMVCUE or the existing estimator with which it has similar properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100988762023-04-14 Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data Khan, Josephine N. Kimani, Peter K. Glimm, Ekkehard Stallard, Nigel Stat Med Research Articles Phase II/III clinical trials are efficient two‐stage designs that test multiple experimental treatments. In stage 1, patients are allocated to the control and all experimental treatments, with the data collected from them used to select experimental treatments to continue to stage 2. Patients recruited in stage 2 are allocated to the selected treatments and the control. Combined data of stage 1 and stage 2 are used for a confirmatory phase III analysis. Appropriate analysis needs to adjust for selection bias of the stage 1 data. Point estimators exist for normally distributed outcome data. Extending these estimators to time to event data is not straightforward because treatment selection is based on correlated treatment effects and stage 1 patients who do not get events in stage 1 are followed‐up in stage 2. We have derived an approximately uniformly minimum variance conditional unbiased estimator (UMVCUE) and compared its biases and mean squared errors to existing bias adjusted estimators. In simulations, one existing bias adjusted estimator has similar properties as the practically unbiased UMVCUE while the others can have noticeable biases but they are less variable than the UMVCUE. For confirmatory phase II/III clinical trials where unbiased estimators are desired, we recommend the UMVCUE or the existing estimator with which it has similar properties. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-23 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10098876/ /pubmed/36419206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.9606 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Khan, Josephine N.
Kimani, Peter K.
Glimm, Ekkehard
Stallard, Nigel
Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
title Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
title_full Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
title_fullStr Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
title_full_unstemmed Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
title_short Adjusting for treatment selection in phase II/III clinical trials with time to event data
title_sort adjusting for treatment selection in phase ii/iii clinical trials with time to event data
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.9606
work_keys_str_mv AT khanjosephinen adjustingfortreatmentselectioninphaseiiiiiclinicaltrialswithtimetoeventdata
AT kimanipeterk adjustingfortreatmentselectioninphaseiiiiiclinicaltrialswithtimetoeventdata
AT glimmekkehard adjustingfortreatmentselectioninphaseiiiiiclinicaltrialswithtimetoeventdata
AT stallardnigel adjustingfortreatmentselectioninphaseiiiiiclinicaltrialswithtimetoeventdata