Cargando…

Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review

Evidence suggests that COVID-19 may impair access to sexual and reproductive health services and safe abortion. The purpose of this systematic review was investigating the changes of abortion services in the COVID-19 pandemic era. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qaderi, Kowsar, Khodavirdilou, Rasa, Kalhor, Mehri, Behbahani, Bahar Morshed, Keshavarz, Maryam, Bashtian, Maryam Hassanzadeh, Dabir, Mahsa, Irani, Morvarid, Manouchehri, Elham, Farahani, Maryam Farmahini, Mallah, Manthar Ali, Shamsabadi, Ahmadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37055839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01582-3
_version_ 1785024950263873536
author Qaderi, Kowsar
Khodavirdilou, Rasa
Kalhor, Mehri
Behbahani, Bahar Morshed
Keshavarz, Maryam
Bashtian, Maryam Hassanzadeh
Dabir, Mahsa
Irani, Morvarid
Manouchehri, Elham
Farahani, Maryam Farmahini
Mallah, Manthar Ali
Shamsabadi, Ahmadreza
author_facet Qaderi, Kowsar
Khodavirdilou, Rasa
Kalhor, Mehri
Behbahani, Bahar Morshed
Keshavarz, Maryam
Bashtian, Maryam Hassanzadeh
Dabir, Mahsa
Irani, Morvarid
Manouchehri, Elham
Farahani, Maryam Farmahini
Mallah, Manthar Ali
Shamsabadi, Ahmadreza
author_sort Qaderi, Kowsar
collection PubMed
description Evidence suggests that COVID-19 may impair access to sexual and reproductive health services and safe abortion. The purpose of this systematic review was investigating the changes of abortion services in the COVID-19 pandemic era. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published as of August 2021, using relevant keywords. RCT and non-original studies were excluded from the analysis and 17 studies of 151 included in our review. Requests to access medication abortion by telemedicine and demand for self-managed abortion were the main findings of identified studies. Women requested an abortion earlier in their pregnancy, and were satisfied with tele-abortion care due to its flexibility, and ongoing telephone support. Presenting telemedicine services without ultrasound has also been reported. Visits to clinics were reduced based on the severity of the restrictions, and abortion clinics had less revenue, more costs, and more changes in the work style of their healthcare providers. Telemedicine was reported safe, effective, acceptable, and empowering for women. Reasons for using tele-abortion were privacy, secrecy, comfort, using modern contraception, employing of women, distance from clinics, travel restrictions, lockdowns, fear of COVID-19, and political reasons (abortion prohibition). Complications of women using tele-abortion were pain, lack of psychological support, bleeding, and need to blood transfusions. The results of this study showed that using telemedicine and teleconsultations for medical abortion in the pandemic conditions may be extended after pandemic. Findings can be used by reproductive healthcare providers and policy makers to address the complications of abortion services. Trail registration This study is registered in PROSPERO with number CRD42021279042 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-023-01582-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10098996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100989962023-04-14 Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review Qaderi, Kowsar Khodavirdilou, Rasa Kalhor, Mehri Behbahani, Bahar Morshed Keshavarz, Maryam Bashtian, Maryam Hassanzadeh Dabir, Mahsa Irani, Morvarid Manouchehri, Elham Farahani, Maryam Farmahini Mallah, Manthar Ali Shamsabadi, Ahmadreza Reprod Health Review Evidence suggests that COVID-19 may impair access to sexual and reproductive health services and safe abortion. The purpose of this systematic review was investigating the changes of abortion services in the COVID-19 pandemic era. We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for relevant studies published as of August 2021, using relevant keywords. RCT and non-original studies were excluded from the analysis and 17 studies of 151 included in our review. Requests to access medication abortion by telemedicine and demand for self-managed abortion were the main findings of identified studies. Women requested an abortion earlier in their pregnancy, and were satisfied with tele-abortion care due to its flexibility, and ongoing telephone support. Presenting telemedicine services without ultrasound has also been reported. Visits to clinics were reduced based on the severity of the restrictions, and abortion clinics had less revenue, more costs, and more changes in the work style of their healthcare providers. Telemedicine was reported safe, effective, acceptable, and empowering for women. Reasons for using tele-abortion were privacy, secrecy, comfort, using modern contraception, employing of women, distance from clinics, travel restrictions, lockdowns, fear of COVID-19, and political reasons (abortion prohibition). Complications of women using tele-abortion were pain, lack of psychological support, bleeding, and need to blood transfusions. The results of this study showed that using telemedicine and teleconsultations for medical abortion in the pandemic conditions may be extended after pandemic. Findings can be used by reproductive healthcare providers and policy makers to address the complications of abortion services. Trail registration This study is registered in PROSPERO with number CRD42021279042 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-023-01582-3. BioMed Central 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10098996/ /pubmed/37055839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01582-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Qaderi, Kowsar
Khodavirdilou, Rasa
Kalhor, Mehri
Behbahani, Bahar Morshed
Keshavarz, Maryam
Bashtian, Maryam Hassanzadeh
Dabir, Mahsa
Irani, Morvarid
Manouchehri, Elham
Farahani, Maryam Farmahini
Mallah, Manthar Ali
Shamsabadi, Ahmadreza
Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
title Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
title_full Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
title_fullStr Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
title_short Abortion services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review
title_sort abortion services during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10098996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37055839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01582-3
work_keys_str_mv AT qaderikowsar abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT khodavirdilourasa abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT kalhormehri abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT behbahanibaharmorshed abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT keshavarzmaryam abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT bashtianmaryamhassanzadeh abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT dabirmahsa abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT iranimorvarid abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT manouchehrielham abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT farahanimaryamfarmahini abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT mallahmantharali abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview
AT shamsabadiahmadreza abortionservicesduringthecovid19pandemicasystematicreview