Cargando…

Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of a model of seven principles for effective visiting primary care services and to determine how it could be conceptualised as a tool for evaluation. SETTING: The research was undertaken in the context of visiting primary care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Healy, Laura J., Beccaria, Gavin, McIlveen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36448590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12946
_version_ 1785025058621620224
author Healy, Laura J.
Beccaria, Gavin
McIlveen, Peter
author_facet Healy, Laura J.
Beccaria, Gavin
McIlveen, Peter
author_sort Healy, Laura J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of a model of seven principles for effective visiting primary care services and to determine how it could be conceptualised as a tool for evaluation. SETTING: The research was undertaken in the context of visiting primary care services with an agency, Outback Futures, selected as a case study. PARTICIPANTS: Three executive staff with Outback Futures participated in the research. DESIGN: The case study design involved data collection by four group interviews conducted between July and November 2021. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: This case study is additional evidence for the clinical utility of the model of seven principles. The results reinforce the importance of a community‐focussed approach to assess the impact of visiting service organisations on rural and remote communities. A comprehensive approach to evaluation is required to justify the investments made and safeguard the health and well‐being of rural and remote residents. A self‐assessment protocol has been established from the model for use by visiting services. Furthermore, three themes were drawn from the data: relationship is fundamental, the importance of co‐design, and being effective as a visiting service is challenging. CONCLUSION: The model is appropriate for the case study organisation, and has clinical utility and implications for other visiting services. A self‐assessment protocol has been developed. Future research should apply the model and protocol self‐assessment tool in an effort to construct a consistent and credible approach to evaluation of visiting primary care services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100994632023-04-14 Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study Healy, Laura J. Beccaria, Gavin McIlveen, Peter Aust J Rural Health Special Issue: Co Design OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of a model of seven principles for effective visiting primary care services and to determine how it could be conceptualised as a tool for evaluation. SETTING: The research was undertaken in the context of visiting primary care services with an agency, Outback Futures, selected as a case study. PARTICIPANTS: Three executive staff with Outback Futures participated in the research. DESIGN: The case study design involved data collection by four group interviews conducted between July and November 2021. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: This case study is additional evidence for the clinical utility of the model of seven principles. The results reinforce the importance of a community‐focussed approach to assess the impact of visiting service organisations on rural and remote communities. A comprehensive approach to evaluation is required to justify the investments made and safeguard the health and well‐being of rural and remote residents. A self‐assessment protocol has been established from the model for use by visiting services. Furthermore, three themes were drawn from the data: relationship is fundamental, the importance of co‐design, and being effective as a visiting service is challenging. CONCLUSION: The model is appropriate for the case study organisation, and has clinical utility and implications for other visiting services. A self‐assessment protocol has been developed. Future research should apply the model and protocol self‐assessment tool in an effort to construct a consistent and credible approach to evaluation of visiting primary care services. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-30 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10099463/ /pubmed/36448590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12946 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Australian Journal of Rural Health published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of National Rural Health Alliance Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Special Issue: Co Design
Healy, Laura J.
Beccaria, Gavin
McIlveen, Peter
Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study
title Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study
title_full Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study
title_fullStr Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study
title_full_unstemmed Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study
title_short Indicators for effective visiting primary care services: A case study
title_sort indicators for effective visiting primary care services: a case study
topic Special Issue: Co Design
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36448590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12946
work_keys_str_mv AT healylauraj indicatorsforeffectivevisitingprimarycareservicesacasestudy
AT beccariagavin indicatorsforeffectivevisitingprimarycareservicesacasestudy
AT mcilveenpeter indicatorsforeffectivevisitingprimarycareservicesacasestudy