Cargando…

Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching

Drawing on the themes identified by Watling et al. regarding feedback in peer review, the authors consider how their findings could be applied more broadly to faculty feedback.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Margalit, Noam, Pincavage, Amber T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14980
_version_ 1785025067660345344
author Margalit, Noam
Pincavage, Amber T.
author_facet Margalit, Noam
Pincavage, Amber T.
author_sort Margalit, Noam
collection PubMed
description Drawing on the themes identified by Watling et al. regarding feedback in peer review, the authors consider how their findings could be applied more broadly to faculty feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100995072023-04-14 Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching Margalit, Noam Pincavage, Amber T. Med Educ Commentaries Drawing on the themes identified by Watling et al. regarding feedback in peer review, the authors consider how their findings could be applied more broadly to faculty feedback. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-29 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10099507/ /pubmed/36419318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14980 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Education published by Association for the Study of Medical Education and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Commentaries
Margalit, Noam
Pincavage, Amber T.
Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
title Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
title_full Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
title_fullStr Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
title_full_unstemmed Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
title_short Feedback as dialogue for faculty: From peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
title_sort feedback as dialogue for faculty: from peer review to peer‐to‐peer coaching
topic Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36419318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/medu.14980
work_keys_str_mv AT margalitnoam feedbackasdialogueforfacultyfrompeerreviewtopeertopeercoaching
AT pincavageambert feedbackasdialogueforfacultyfrompeerreviewtopeertopeercoaching