Cargando…

Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review

PURPOSE: Removal of ceramic restorations and appliances can be time consuming, invasive, and inconvenient. Erbium lasers offer an alternative noninvasive method for debonding of ceramic appliances. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of current literature on the effectiveness of erbium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deeb, Janina Golob, Grzech‐Leśniak, Kinga, Brody, Erica R., Matys, Jacek, Bencharit, Sompop
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13613
_version_ 1785025094317244416
author Deeb, Janina Golob
Grzech‐Leśniak, Kinga
Brody, Erica R.
Matys, Jacek
Bencharit, Sompop
author_facet Deeb, Janina Golob
Grzech‐Leśniak, Kinga
Brody, Erica R.
Matys, Jacek
Bencharit, Sompop
author_sort Deeb, Janina Golob
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Removal of ceramic restorations and appliances can be time consuming, invasive, and inconvenient. Erbium lasers offer an alternative noninvasive method for debonding of ceramic appliances. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of current literature on the effectiveness of erbium lasers for removal of ceramic restorations and appliances from natural teeth and dental implants. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 7 databases, including Medline (Ovid), Embase, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (DOSS), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses was performed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were agreed prior to the literature search. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract. A third reviewer then broke the tie, if any. The selected articles then underwent full text review and the data was extracted. RESULTS: The search identified 4117 unique articles published through June 10, 2021. Studies were assessed and categorized based on the type of restoration/appliance, type of abutment, type of laser, laser settings, efficacy of debonding, and pulpal temperature rise. Thirty‐eight full‐text articles were reviewed for inclusion. Time for ceramic debonding varies depending on the type of restorations and materials. Removal of zirconia crowns from teeth and implant abutments requires a longer period of time compared to lithium disilicate crowns. Temperature increases were reported as 5.5 degrees or less. Laser setting and laser type affect the debonding time and the increase in temperature. Examinations of debonded ceramics demonstrated no known structural damages resulting from laser applications. CONCLUSIONS: Erbium lasers are effective noninvasive tools to remove all ceramic restorations/appliances from natural teeth and implant abutments without causing harm to abutments. Laser‐assisted debonding should be considered as a viable alternative to rotary instrumentation for ceramic crowns; however, clinical studies of erbium‐assisted ceramic retrieval are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100996282023-04-14 Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review Deeb, Janina Golob Grzech‐Leśniak, Kinga Brody, Erica R. Matys, Jacek Bencharit, Sompop J Prosthodont Reviews PURPOSE: Removal of ceramic restorations and appliances can be time consuming, invasive, and inconvenient. Erbium lasers offer an alternative noninvasive method for debonding of ceramic appliances. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of current literature on the effectiveness of erbium lasers for removal of ceramic restorations and appliances from natural teeth and dental implants. METHODS: A comprehensive search of 7 databases, including Medline (Ovid), Embase, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (DOSS), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses was performed. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were agreed prior to the literature search. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract. A third reviewer then broke the tie, if any. The selected articles then underwent full text review and the data was extracted. RESULTS: The search identified 4117 unique articles published through June 10, 2021. Studies were assessed and categorized based on the type of restoration/appliance, type of abutment, type of laser, laser settings, efficacy of debonding, and pulpal temperature rise. Thirty‐eight full‐text articles were reviewed for inclusion. Time for ceramic debonding varies depending on the type of restorations and materials. Removal of zirconia crowns from teeth and implant abutments requires a longer period of time compared to lithium disilicate crowns. Temperature increases were reported as 5.5 degrees or less. Laser setting and laser type affect the debonding time and the increase in temperature. Examinations of debonded ceramics demonstrated no known structural damages resulting from laser applications. CONCLUSIONS: Erbium lasers are effective noninvasive tools to remove all ceramic restorations/appliances from natural teeth and implant abutments without causing harm to abutments. Laser‐assisted debonding should be considered as a viable alternative to rotary instrumentation for ceramic crowns; however, clinical studies of erbium‐assisted ceramic retrieval are needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-10 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10099628/ /pubmed/36269672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13613 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Deeb, Janina Golob
Grzech‐Leśniak, Kinga
Brody, Erica R.
Matys, Jacek
Bencharit, Sompop
Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
title Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
title_full Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
title_fullStr Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
title_short Erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
title_sort erbium laser‐assisted ceramic debonding: a scoping review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36269672
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13613
work_keys_str_mv AT deebjaninagolob erbiumlaserassistedceramicdebondingascopingreview
AT grzechlesniakkinga erbiumlaserassistedceramicdebondingascopingreview
AT brodyericar erbiumlaserassistedceramicdebondingascopingreview
AT matysjacek erbiumlaserassistedceramicdebondingascopingreview
AT bencharitsompop erbiumlaserassistedceramicdebondingascopingreview