Cargando…
Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the most widely used hypnotic agents in the world. Nonetheless, propofol might have detrimental effects on clinically relevant outcomes, possibly due to inhibition of other interventions' organ protective properties. We performed a systematic review and meta-analy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04431-8 |
_version_ | 1785025108811710464 |
---|---|
author | Kotani, Yuki Pruna, Alessandro Turi, Stefano Borghi, Giovanni Lee, Todd C. Zangrillo, Alberto Landoni, Giovanni Pasin, Laura |
author_facet | Kotani, Yuki Pruna, Alessandro Turi, Stefano Borghi, Giovanni Lee, Todd C. Zangrillo, Alberto Landoni, Giovanni Pasin, Laura |
author_sort | Kotani, Yuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the most widely used hypnotic agents in the world. Nonetheless, propofol might have detrimental effects on clinically relevant outcomes, possibly due to inhibition of other interventions' organ protective properties. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate if propofol reduced survival compared to any other hypnotic agent in any clinical setting. METHODS: We searched eligible studies in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. The following inclusion criteria were used: random treatment allocation and comparison between propofol and any comparator in any clinical setting. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. We conducted a fixed-effects meta-analysis for the risk ratio (RR). Using this RR and 95% confidence interval, we estimated the probability of any harm (RR > 1) through Bayesian statistics. We registered this systematic review and meta-analysis in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022323143). RESULTS: We identified 252 randomized trials comprising 30,757 patients. Mortality was higher in the propofol group than in the comparator group (760/14,754 [5.2%] vs. 682/16,003 [4.3%]; RR = 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.20; p = 0.03; I(2) = 0%; number needed to harm = 235), corresponding to a 98.4% probability of any increase in mortality. A statistically significant mortality increase in the propofol group was confirmed in subgroups of cardiac surgery, adult patients, volatile agent as comparator, large studies, and studies with low mortality in the comparator arm. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol may reduce survival in perioperative and critically ill patients. This needs careful assessment of the risk versus benefit of propofol compared to other agents while planning for large, pragmatic multicentric randomized controlled trials to provide a definitive answer. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04431-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10099692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100996922023-04-14 Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Kotani, Yuki Pruna, Alessandro Turi, Stefano Borghi, Giovanni Lee, Todd C. Zangrillo, Alberto Landoni, Giovanni Pasin, Laura Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Propofol is one of the most widely used hypnotic agents in the world. Nonetheless, propofol might have detrimental effects on clinically relevant outcomes, possibly due to inhibition of other interventions' organ protective properties. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate if propofol reduced survival compared to any other hypnotic agent in any clinical setting. METHODS: We searched eligible studies in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials. The following inclusion criteria were used: random treatment allocation and comparison between propofol and any comparator in any clinical setting. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. We conducted a fixed-effects meta-analysis for the risk ratio (RR). Using this RR and 95% confidence interval, we estimated the probability of any harm (RR > 1) through Bayesian statistics. We registered this systematic review and meta-analysis in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022323143). RESULTS: We identified 252 randomized trials comprising 30,757 patients. Mortality was higher in the propofol group than in the comparator group (760/14,754 [5.2%] vs. 682/16,003 [4.3%]; RR = 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.20; p = 0.03; I(2) = 0%; number needed to harm = 235), corresponding to a 98.4% probability of any increase in mortality. A statistically significant mortality increase in the propofol group was confirmed in subgroups of cardiac surgery, adult patients, volatile agent as comparator, large studies, and studies with low mortality in the comparator arm. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol may reduce survival in perioperative and critically ill patients. This needs careful assessment of the risk versus benefit of propofol compared to other agents while planning for large, pragmatic multicentric randomized controlled trials to provide a definitive answer. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04431-8. BioMed Central 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10099692/ /pubmed/37046269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04431-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kotani, Yuki Pruna, Alessandro Turi, Stefano Borghi, Giovanni Lee, Todd C. Zangrillo, Alberto Landoni, Giovanni Pasin, Laura Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title | Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full | Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_short | Propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_sort | propofol and survival: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37046269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04431-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotaniyuki propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT prunaalessandro propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT turistefano propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT borghigiovanni propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT leetoddc propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT zangrilloalberto propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT landonigiovanni propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT pasinlaura propofolandsurvivalanupdatedmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |