Cargando…

Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies

We present an analysis of the pseudorapidity [Formula: see text] and transverse momentum [Formula: see text] distributions of charged hadrons in [Formula: see text] collisions for the kinematic range of [Formula: see text] GeV/c and [Formula: see text] at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV. Charged particles are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ajaz, Muhammad, Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim, Ullah Mian, Mateen, Khan, Rashid, Shehzadi, Ramoona, Adil Khan, Muhammad, AbdelKader, Atef, Waqas, Muhammad, Dawi, Elmuez A., Tabassam, Uzma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981340
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25030452
_version_ 1785025113961267200
author Ajaz, Muhammad
Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim
Ullah Mian, Mateen
Khan, Rashid
Shehzadi, Ramoona
Adil Khan, Muhammad
AbdelKader, Atef
Waqas, Muhammad
Dawi, Elmuez A.
Tabassam, Uzma
author_facet Ajaz, Muhammad
Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim
Ullah Mian, Mateen
Khan, Rashid
Shehzadi, Ramoona
Adil Khan, Muhammad
AbdelKader, Atef
Waqas, Muhammad
Dawi, Elmuez A.
Tabassam, Uzma
author_sort Ajaz, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description We present an analysis of the pseudorapidity [Formula: see text] and transverse momentum [Formula: see text] distributions of charged hadrons in [Formula: see text] collisions for the kinematic range of [Formula: see text] GeV/c and [Formula: see text] at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV. Charged particles are produced in [Formula: see text] collision using several Monte Carlo event generators (Pythia Simple, Vincia, Dire showers, Sibyll2.3d, QGSJETII-04, EPOS-LHC) and compared with CMS data at LHC. It is observed that the Simple parton showers can explain the CMS data very well for [Formula: see text] GeV/c at 0.9 and 2.36 TeV within the experimental errors, while Dire overshoots and Vicia undershoots the data by 50% each. At 7 TeV, the Dire module presents a good prediction, whereas the Simple and Vincia modules underestimate the data within 30% and 50%. Comparing the Simple module of the Pythia model and the predictions of the CRMC models with the experimental data shows that at 0.9 TeV, EPOS-LHC has better results than the others. At 2.36 GeV, the cosmic rays Monte Carlo (CRMC) models have better prediction than the Simple module of Pythia at low [Formula: see text] , while QGSJETII-04 predicts well at high [Formula: see text]. QGSJETII-04 and EPOS-LHC have closer results than the Pythia-Simple and Sibyll2.3d at 7 TeV. In the case of the pseudorapidity distributions, only the Pythia-Simple reproduced the experimental measurements at all energies. The Dire module overestimates, while Vincia underestimates the data in decreasing order of discrepancy (20%, 12%, 5%) with energy. All CRMC models underestimate the data over the entire [Formula: see text] range at all energies by 20%. The angular ordering of partons and the parton fragmentation could be possible reasons for this deviation. Furthermore, we used the two-component standard distribution to fit the [Formula: see text] spectra to the experimental data and extracted the effective temperature ([Formula: see text]) and the multiplicity parameter ([Formula: see text]). It is observed that [Formula: see text] increases with the increase in the center of mass energy. The fit yielded [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] GeV for 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV, respectively. This shows that the system at higher energies freezes out earlier than lower ones because they quickly attain the equilibrium state.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100997152023-04-14 Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies Ajaz, Muhammad Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim Ullah Mian, Mateen Khan, Rashid Shehzadi, Ramoona Adil Khan, Muhammad AbdelKader, Atef Waqas, Muhammad Dawi, Elmuez A. Tabassam, Uzma Entropy (Basel) Article We present an analysis of the pseudorapidity [Formula: see text] and transverse momentum [Formula: see text] distributions of charged hadrons in [Formula: see text] collisions for the kinematic range of [Formula: see text] GeV/c and [Formula: see text] at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV. Charged particles are produced in [Formula: see text] collision using several Monte Carlo event generators (Pythia Simple, Vincia, Dire showers, Sibyll2.3d, QGSJETII-04, EPOS-LHC) and compared with CMS data at LHC. It is observed that the Simple parton showers can explain the CMS data very well for [Formula: see text] GeV/c at 0.9 and 2.36 TeV within the experimental errors, while Dire overshoots and Vicia undershoots the data by 50% each. At 7 TeV, the Dire module presents a good prediction, whereas the Simple and Vincia modules underestimate the data within 30% and 50%. Comparing the Simple module of the Pythia model and the predictions of the CRMC models with the experimental data shows that at 0.9 TeV, EPOS-LHC has better results than the others. At 2.36 GeV, the cosmic rays Monte Carlo (CRMC) models have better prediction than the Simple module of Pythia at low [Formula: see text] , while QGSJETII-04 predicts well at high [Formula: see text]. QGSJETII-04 and EPOS-LHC have closer results than the Pythia-Simple and Sibyll2.3d at 7 TeV. In the case of the pseudorapidity distributions, only the Pythia-Simple reproduced the experimental measurements at all energies. The Dire module overestimates, while Vincia underestimates the data in decreasing order of discrepancy (20%, 12%, 5%) with energy. All CRMC models underestimate the data over the entire [Formula: see text] range at all energies by 20%. The angular ordering of partons and the parton fragmentation could be possible reasons for this deviation. Furthermore, we used the two-component standard distribution to fit the [Formula: see text] spectra to the experimental data and extracted the effective temperature ([Formula: see text]) and the multiplicity parameter ([Formula: see text]). It is observed that [Formula: see text] increases with the increase in the center of mass energy. The fit yielded [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] GeV for 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV, respectively. This shows that the system at higher energies freezes out earlier than lower ones because they quickly attain the equilibrium state. MDPI 2023-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10099715/ /pubmed/36981340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25030452 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ajaz, Muhammad
Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim
Ullah Mian, Mateen
Khan, Rashid
Shehzadi, Ramoona
Adil Khan, Muhammad
AbdelKader, Atef
Waqas, Muhammad
Dawi, Elmuez A.
Tabassam, Uzma
Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
title Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
title_full Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
title_fullStr Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
title_full_unstemmed Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
title_short Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
title_sort charged particles transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distribution in hadronic collisions at lhc energies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981340
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25030452
work_keys_str_mv AT ajazmuhammad chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT hajismailabdalkarim chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT ullahmianmateen chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT khanrashid chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT shehzadiramoona chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT adilkhanmuhammad chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT abdelkaderatef chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT waqasmuhammad chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT dawielmueza chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies
AT tabassamuzma chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies