Cargando…
Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies
We present an analysis of the pseudorapidity [Formula: see text] and transverse momentum [Formula: see text] distributions of charged hadrons in [Formula: see text] collisions for the kinematic range of [Formula: see text] GeV/c and [Formula: see text] at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV. Charged particles are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25030452 |
_version_ | 1785025113961267200 |
---|---|
author | Ajaz, Muhammad Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim Ullah Mian, Mateen Khan, Rashid Shehzadi, Ramoona Adil Khan, Muhammad AbdelKader, Atef Waqas, Muhammad Dawi, Elmuez A. Tabassam, Uzma |
author_facet | Ajaz, Muhammad Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim Ullah Mian, Mateen Khan, Rashid Shehzadi, Ramoona Adil Khan, Muhammad AbdelKader, Atef Waqas, Muhammad Dawi, Elmuez A. Tabassam, Uzma |
author_sort | Ajaz, Muhammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present an analysis of the pseudorapidity [Formula: see text] and transverse momentum [Formula: see text] distributions of charged hadrons in [Formula: see text] collisions for the kinematic range of [Formula: see text] GeV/c and [Formula: see text] at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV. Charged particles are produced in [Formula: see text] collision using several Monte Carlo event generators (Pythia Simple, Vincia, Dire showers, Sibyll2.3d, QGSJETII-04, EPOS-LHC) and compared with CMS data at LHC. It is observed that the Simple parton showers can explain the CMS data very well for [Formula: see text] GeV/c at 0.9 and 2.36 TeV within the experimental errors, while Dire overshoots and Vicia undershoots the data by 50% each. At 7 TeV, the Dire module presents a good prediction, whereas the Simple and Vincia modules underestimate the data within 30% and 50%. Comparing the Simple module of the Pythia model and the predictions of the CRMC models with the experimental data shows that at 0.9 TeV, EPOS-LHC has better results than the others. At 2.36 GeV, the cosmic rays Monte Carlo (CRMC) models have better prediction than the Simple module of Pythia at low [Formula: see text] , while QGSJETII-04 predicts well at high [Formula: see text]. QGSJETII-04 and EPOS-LHC have closer results than the Pythia-Simple and Sibyll2.3d at 7 TeV. In the case of the pseudorapidity distributions, only the Pythia-Simple reproduced the experimental measurements at all energies. The Dire module overestimates, while Vincia underestimates the data in decreasing order of discrepancy (20%, 12%, 5%) with energy. All CRMC models underestimate the data over the entire [Formula: see text] range at all energies by 20%. The angular ordering of partons and the parton fragmentation could be possible reasons for this deviation. Furthermore, we used the two-component standard distribution to fit the [Formula: see text] spectra to the experimental data and extracted the effective temperature ([Formula: see text]) and the multiplicity parameter ([Formula: see text]). It is observed that [Formula: see text] increases with the increase in the center of mass energy. The fit yielded [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] GeV for 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV, respectively. This shows that the system at higher energies freezes out earlier than lower ones because they quickly attain the equilibrium state. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10099715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100997152023-04-14 Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies Ajaz, Muhammad Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim Ullah Mian, Mateen Khan, Rashid Shehzadi, Ramoona Adil Khan, Muhammad AbdelKader, Atef Waqas, Muhammad Dawi, Elmuez A. Tabassam, Uzma Entropy (Basel) Article We present an analysis of the pseudorapidity [Formula: see text] and transverse momentum [Formula: see text] distributions of charged hadrons in [Formula: see text] collisions for the kinematic range of [Formula: see text] GeV/c and [Formula: see text] at 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV. Charged particles are produced in [Formula: see text] collision using several Monte Carlo event generators (Pythia Simple, Vincia, Dire showers, Sibyll2.3d, QGSJETII-04, EPOS-LHC) and compared with CMS data at LHC. It is observed that the Simple parton showers can explain the CMS data very well for [Formula: see text] GeV/c at 0.9 and 2.36 TeV within the experimental errors, while Dire overshoots and Vicia undershoots the data by 50% each. At 7 TeV, the Dire module presents a good prediction, whereas the Simple and Vincia modules underestimate the data within 30% and 50%. Comparing the Simple module of the Pythia model and the predictions of the CRMC models with the experimental data shows that at 0.9 TeV, EPOS-LHC has better results than the others. At 2.36 GeV, the cosmic rays Monte Carlo (CRMC) models have better prediction than the Simple module of Pythia at low [Formula: see text] , while QGSJETII-04 predicts well at high [Formula: see text]. QGSJETII-04 and EPOS-LHC have closer results than the Pythia-Simple and Sibyll2.3d at 7 TeV. In the case of the pseudorapidity distributions, only the Pythia-Simple reproduced the experimental measurements at all energies. The Dire module overestimates, while Vincia underestimates the data in decreasing order of discrepancy (20%, 12%, 5%) with energy. All CRMC models underestimate the data over the entire [Formula: see text] range at all energies by 20%. The angular ordering of partons and the parton fragmentation could be possible reasons for this deviation. Furthermore, we used the two-component standard distribution to fit the [Formula: see text] spectra to the experimental data and extracted the effective temperature ([Formula: see text]) and the multiplicity parameter ([Formula: see text]). It is observed that [Formula: see text] increases with the increase in the center of mass energy. The fit yielded [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , and [Formula: see text] GeV for 0.9, 2.36, and 7 TeV, respectively. This shows that the system at higher energies freezes out earlier than lower ones because they quickly attain the equilibrium state. MDPI 2023-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10099715/ /pubmed/36981340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25030452 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ajaz, Muhammad Haj Ismail, Abd Al Karim Ullah Mian, Mateen Khan, Rashid Shehzadi, Ramoona Adil Khan, Muhammad AbdelKader, Atef Waqas, Muhammad Dawi, Elmuez A. Tabassam, Uzma Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies |
title | Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies |
title_full | Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies |
title_fullStr | Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies |
title_full_unstemmed | Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies |
title_short | Charged Particles Transverse Momentum and Pseudorapidity Distribution in Hadronic Collisions at LHC Energies |
title_sort | charged particles transverse momentum and pseudorapidity distribution in hadronic collisions at lhc energies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36981340 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e25030452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ajazmuhammad chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT hajismailabdalkarim chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT ullahmianmateen chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT khanrashid chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT shehzadiramoona chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT adilkhanmuhammad chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT abdelkaderatef chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT waqasmuhammad chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT dawielmueza chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies AT tabassamuzma chargedparticlestransversemomentumandpseudorapiditydistributioninhadroniccollisionsatlhcenergies |