Cargando…

Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?

OBJECTIVES: No recommendation exists on the optimal antithrombotic therapy after left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resection in the current guidelines. The study aimed to investigate the role of prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin for 3‐6 months in LVT recurrence and other clinical outcomes aft...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Shicheng, Huang, Siyuan, Tiemuerniyazi, Xieraili, Song, Yangwu, Feng, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17215
_version_ 1785025119954927616
author Zhang, Shicheng
Huang, Siyuan
Tiemuerniyazi, Xieraili
Song, Yangwu
Feng, Wei
author_facet Zhang, Shicheng
Huang, Siyuan
Tiemuerniyazi, Xieraili
Song, Yangwu
Feng, Wei
author_sort Zhang, Shicheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: No recommendation exists on the optimal antithrombotic therapy after left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resection in the current guidelines. The study aimed to investigate the role of prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin for 3‐6 months in LVT recurrence and other clinical outcomes after LVT resection and left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing LVT resection together with LVA surgery in our institution between 2010.1.1 and 2021.4.1 were included in the study. Individuals included were divided into two groups based on whether warfarin was administered at discharge. Patients with warfarin were matched to their counterparts without warfarin based on the baseline characteristics via propensity score matching (PSM) at the ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome was LVT recurrence. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and the composite endpoint of LVT recurrence and MACCEs. RESULTS: After PSM, a total of 118 patients were included in the study, among whom 59 received warfarin therapy at discharge and 59 didn't. During the median follow‐up of 56.5 months, 21 out of 118 patients had LVT recurrence and the recurrence rate was 17.8% There was no systemic embolism resulting from the recurrent LVT. Kaplan–Meir analysis showed no significant difference in LVT recurrence (p = .86), MACCEs (p = .48) and the composite endpoint of LVT recurrence, and MACCEs (p = .89). Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that history of PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.778, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.087–7.100, p = .033) and LVA surgical strategy of linear suture (HR 8.768, 95% CI 1.139–67.517, p = .037) were independent risk factors of LVT recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin for 3–6 months may be unnecessary with no benefit in terms of LVT recurrence and other clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100997392023-04-14 Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery? Zhang, Shicheng Huang, Siyuan Tiemuerniyazi, Xieraili Song, Yangwu Feng, Wei J Card Surg Regular Issue Papers OBJECTIVES: No recommendation exists on the optimal antithrombotic therapy after left ventricular thrombus (LVT) resection in the current guidelines. The study aimed to investigate the role of prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin for 3‐6 months in LVT recurrence and other clinical outcomes after LVT resection and left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing LVT resection together with LVA surgery in our institution between 2010.1.1 and 2021.4.1 were included in the study. Individuals included were divided into two groups based on whether warfarin was administered at discharge. Patients with warfarin were matched to their counterparts without warfarin based on the baseline characteristics via propensity score matching (PSM) at the ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome was LVT recurrence. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) and the composite endpoint of LVT recurrence and MACCEs. RESULTS: After PSM, a total of 118 patients were included in the study, among whom 59 received warfarin therapy at discharge and 59 didn't. During the median follow‐up of 56.5 months, 21 out of 118 patients had LVT recurrence and the recurrence rate was 17.8% There was no systemic embolism resulting from the recurrent LVT. Kaplan–Meir analysis showed no significant difference in LVT recurrence (p = .86), MACCEs (p = .48) and the composite endpoint of LVT recurrence, and MACCEs (p = .89). Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that history of PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.778, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.087–7.100, p = .033) and LVA surgical strategy of linear suture (HR 8.768, 95% CI 1.139–67.517, p = .037) were independent risk factors of LVT recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin for 3–6 months may be unnecessary with no benefit in terms of LVT recurrence and other clinical outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-15 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10099739/ /pubmed/36378885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17215 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cardiac Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Regular Issue Papers
Zhang, Shicheng
Huang, Siyuan
Tiemuerniyazi, Xieraili
Song, Yangwu
Feng, Wei
Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
title Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
title_full Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
title_fullStr Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
title_short Is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
title_sort is 3–6 months anticoagulation with warfarin necessary after left ventricular thrombectomy with left ventricular aneurysm surgery?
topic Regular Issue Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36378885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocs.17215
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangshicheng is36monthsanticoagulationwithwarfarinnecessaryafterleftventricularthrombectomywithleftventricularaneurysmsurgery
AT huangsiyuan is36monthsanticoagulationwithwarfarinnecessaryafterleftventricularthrombectomywithleftventricularaneurysmsurgery
AT tiemuerniyazixieraili is36monthsanticoagulationwithwarfarinnecessaryafterleftventricularthrombectomywithleftventricularaneurysmsurgery
AT songyangwu is36monthsanticoagulationwithwarfarinnecessaryafterleftventricularthrombectomywithleftventricularaneurysmsurgery
AT fengwei is36monthsanticoagulationwithwarfarinnecessaryafterleftventricularthrombectomywithleftventricularaneurysmsurgery