Cargando…

A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance

Fibrin sealants are well‐established components of the surgical toolbox, especially in procedures that harbor a high risk of perioperative bleeding. Their widespread use as hemostats, sealants or tissue‐adhesives in various surgical settings has shown that the choice of the appropriate sealant syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reichsöllner, Raffael, Heher, Philipp, Hartmann, Jaana, Manhartseder, Stefan, Singh, Rahul, Gulle, Heinz, Slezak, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37466
_version_ 1785025120436224000
author Reichsöllner, Raffael
Heher, Philipp
Hartmann, Jaana
Manhartseder, Stefan
Singh, Rahul
Gulle, Heinz
Slezak, Paul
author_facet Reichsöllner, Raffael
Heher, Philipp
Hartmann, Jaana
Manhartseder, Stefan
Singh, Rahul
Gulle, Heinz
Slezak, Paul
author_sort Reichsöllner, Raffael
collection PubMed
description Fibrin sealants are well‐established components of the surgical toolbox, especially in procedures that harbor a high risk of perioperative bleeding. Their widespread use as hemostats, sealants or tissue‐adhesives in various surgical settings has shown that the choice of the appropriate sealant system affects the clinical outcome. While many studies have compared the hemostatic efficiency of fibrin sealants to that of other natural or synthetic sealants, there is still limited data on how subtle differences in fibrin sealant formulations relate to their biological performance. Here, we performed an in‐depth physicochemical and biological characterization of the two most commonly used fibrin sealants in the US and Europe: TISSEEL™ (“FS”) and VISTASEAL™/VERASEAL™ (“FS+Osm”). Our chemical analyses demonstrated differences between the two sealants, with lower fibrinogen concentrations and supraphysiological osmolality in the FS+Osm formulation. Rheological testing revealed FS clots have greater clot stiffness, which strongly correlated with network density. Ultrastructural analysis by scanning electron microscopy revealed differences between FS and FS+Osm fibrin networks, the latter characterized by a largely amorphous hydrogel structure in contrast to the physiological fibrillar network of FS. Cytocompatibility experiments with human fibroblasts seeded on FS and FS+Osm fibrin networks, or cultured in presence of sealant extracts, revealed that FS+Osm induced apoptosis, which was not observed with FS. Although differential sealant osmolality and amounts of fibrinogen, as well as the presence of Factor XIII or additives such as antifibrinolytics, may explain the mechanical and structural differences observed between the two fibrin sealants, none of these substances are known to cause apoptosis at the respective concentrations in the sealant formulation. We thus conclude that hyper osmolality in the FS+Osm formulation is the primary trigger of apoptosis—a mechanism that should be evaluated in more detail, as it may affect the cellular wound healing response in situ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100997412023-04-14 A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance Reichsöllner, Raffael Heher, Philipp Hartmann, Jaana Manhartseder, Stefan Singh, Rahul Gulle, Heinz Slezak, Paul J Biomed Mater Res A Research Articles Fibrin sealants are well‐established components of the surgical toolbox, especially in procedures that harbor a high risk of perioperative bleeding. Their widespread use as hemostats, sealants or tissue‐adhesives in various surgical settings has shown that the choice of the appropriate sealant system affects the clinical outcome. While many studies have compared the hemostatic efficiency of fibrin sealants to that of other natural or synthetic sealants, there is still limited data on how subtle differences in fibrin sealant formulations relate to their biological performance. Here, we performed an in‐depth physicochemical and biological characterization of the two most commonly used fibrin sealants in the US and Europe: TISSEEL™ (“FS”) and VISTASEAL™/VERASEAL™ (“FS+Osm”). Our chemical analyses demonstrated differences between the two sealants, with lower fibrinogen concentrations and supraphysiological osmolality in the FS+Osm formulation. Rheological testing revealed FS clots have greater clot stiffness, which strongly correlated with network density. Ultrastructural analysis by scanning electron microscopy revealed differences between FS and FS+Osm fibrin networks, the latter characterized by a largely amorphous hydrogel structure in contrast to the physiological fibrillar network of FS. Cytocompatibility experiments with human fibroblasts seeded on FS and FS+Osm fibrin networks, or cultured in presence of sealant extracts, revealed that FS+Osm induced apoptosis, which was not observed with FS. Although differential sealant osmolality and amounts of fibrinogen, as well as the presence of Factor XIII or additives such as antifibrinolytics, may explain the mechanical and structural differences observed between the two fibrin sealants, none of these substances are known to cause apoptosis at the respective concentrations in the sealant formulation. We thus conclude that hyper osmolality in the FS+Osm formulation is the primary trigger of apoptosis—a mechanism that should be evaluated in more detail, as it may affect the cellular wound healing response in situ. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-10 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10099741/ /pubmed/36355631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37466 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Reichsöllner, Raffael
Heher, Philipp
Hartmann, Jaana
Manhartseder, Stefan
Singh, Rahul
Gulle, Heinz
Slezak, Paul
A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
title A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
title_full A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
title_fullStr A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
title_full_unstemmed A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
title_short A comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: Impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
title_sort comparative high‐resolution physicochemical analysis of commercially available fibrin sealants: impact of sealant osmolality on biological performance
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37466
work_keys_str_mv AT reichsollnerraffael acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT heherphilipp acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT hartmannjaana acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT manhartsederstefan acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT singhrahul acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT gulleheinz acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT slezakpaul acomparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT reichsollnerraffael comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT heherphilipp comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT hartmannjaana comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT manhartsederstefan comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT singhrahul comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT gulleheinz comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance
AT slezakpaul comparativehighresolutionphysicochemicalanalysisofcommerciallyavailablefibrinsealantsimpactofsealantosmolalityonbiologicalperformance