Cargando…

Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation

BACKGROUND: Low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has gained considerable attention as a promising noninvasive neuromodulatory technique for human brains. However, the complex morphology of the skull hinders scholars from precisely predicting the acoustic energy transmitted and the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Mengyue, Peng, Chang, Wu, Huaiyu, Huang, Chih‐Chung, Kim, Taewon, Traylor, Zachary, Muller, Marie, Chhatbar, Pratik Y., Nam, Chang S., Feng, Wuwei, Jiang, Xiaoning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.16090
_version_ 1785025120988823552
author Chen, Mengyue
Peng, Chang
Wu, Huaiyu
Huang, Chih‐Chung
Kim, Taewon
Traylor, Zachary
Muller, Marie
Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
Nam, Chang S.
Feng, Wuwei
Jiang, Xiaoning
author_facet Chen, Mengyue
Peng, Chang
Wu, Huaiyu
Huang, Chih‐Chung
Kim, Taewon
Traylor, Zachary
Muller, Marie
Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
Nam, Chang S.
Feng, Wuwei
Jiang, Xiaoning
author_sort Chen, Mengyue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has gained considerable attention as a promising noninvasive neuromodulatory technique for human brains. However, the complex morphology of the skull hinders scholars from precisely predicting the acoustic energy transmitted and the region of the brain impacted during the sonication. This is due to the fact that different ultrasound frequencies and skull morphology variations greatly affect wave propagation through the skull. PURPOSE: Although the acoustic properties of human skull have been studied for tFUS applications, such as tumor ablation using a multielement phased array, there is no consensus about how to choose a single‐element focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer with a suitable frequency for neuromodulation. There are interests in exploring the magnitude and dimension of tFUS beam through human parietal bone for modulating specific brain lobes. Herein, we aim to investigate the wave propagation of tFUS on human skulls to understand and address the concerns above. METHODS: Both experimental measurements and numerical modeling were conducted to investigate the transmission efficiency and beam pattern of tFUS on five human skulls (C3 and C4 regions) using single‐element FUS transducers with six different frequencies (150–1500 kHz). The degassed skull was placed in a water tank, and a calibrated hydrophone was utilized to measure acoustic pressure past it. The cranial computed tomography scan data of each skull were obtained to derive a high‐resolution acoustic model (grid point spacing: 0.25 mm) in simulations. Meanwhile, we modified the power‐law exponent of acoustic attenuation coefficient to validate numerical modeling and enabled it to be served as a prediction tool, based on the experimental measurements. RESULTS: The transmission efficiency and −6 dB beamwidth were evaluated and compared for various frequencies. An exponential decrease in transmission efficiency and a logarithmic decrease of −6 dB beamwidth with an increase in ultrasound frequency were observed. It is found that a >750 kHz ultrasound leads to a relatively lower tFUS transmission efficiency (<5%), whereas a <350 kHz ultrasound contributes to a relatively broader beamwidth (>5 mm). Based on these observations, we further analyzed the dependence of tFUS wave propagation on FUS transducer aperture size. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully studied tFUS wave propagation through human skulls at different frequencies experimentally and numerically. The findings have important implications to predict tFUS wave propagation for ultrasound neuromodulation in clinical applications, and guide researchers to develop advanced ultrasound transducers as neural interfaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100997432023-04-14 Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation Chen, Mengyue Peng, Chang Wu, Huaiyu Huang, Chih‐Chung Kim, Taewon Traylor, Zachary Muller, Marie Chhatbar, Pratik Y. Nam, Chang S. Feng, Wuwei Jiang, Xiaoning Med Phys THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS BACKGROUND: Low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has gained considerable attention as a promising noninvasive neuromodulatory technique for human brains. However, the complex morphology of the skull hinders scholars from precisely predicting the acoustic energy transmitted and the region of the brain impacted during the sonication. This is due to the fact that different ultrasound frequencies and skull morphology variations greatly affect wave propagation through the skull. PURPOSE: Although the acoustic properties of human skull have been studied for tFUS applications, such as tumor ablation using a multielement phased array, there is no consensus about how to choose a single‐element focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer with a suitable frequency for neuromodulation. There are interests in exploring the magnitude and dimension of tFUS beam through human parietal bone for modulating specific brain lobes. Herein, we aim to investigate the wave propagation of tFUS on human skulls to understand and address the concerns above. METHODS: Both experimental measurements and numerical modeling were conducted to investigate the transmission efficiency and beam pattern of tFUS on five human skulls (C3 and C4 regions) using single‐element FUS transducers with six different frequencies (150–1500 kHz). The degassed skull was placed in a water tank, and a calibrated hydrophone was utilized to measure acoustic pressure past it. The cranial computed tomography scan data of each skull were obtained to derive a high‐resolution acoustic model (grid point spacing: 0.25 mm) in simulations. Meanwhile, we modified the power‐law exponent of acoustic attenuation coefficient to validate numerical modeling and enabled it to be served as a prediction tool, based on the experimental measurements. RESULTS: The transmission efficiency and −6 dB beamwidth were evaluated and compared for various frequencies. An exponential decrease in transmission efficiency and a logarithmic decrease of −6 dB beamwidth with an increase in ultrasound frequency were observed. It is found that a >750 kHz ultrasound leads to a relatively lower tFUS transmission efficiency (<5%), whereas a <350 kHz ultrasound contributes to a relatively broader beamwidth (>5 mm). Based on these observations, we further analyzed the dependence of tFUS wave propagation on FUS transducer aperture size. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully studied tFUS wave propagation through human skulls at different frequencies experimentally and numerically. The findings have important implications to predict tFUS wave propagation for ultrasound neuromodulation in clinical applications, and guide researchers to develop advanced ultrasound transducers as neural interfaces. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-24 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10099743/ /pubmed/36342303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.16090 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS
Chen, Mengyue
Peng, Chang
Wu, Huaiyu
Huang, Chih‐Chung
Kim, Taewon
Traylor, Zachary
Muller, Marie
Chhatbar, Pratik Y.
Nam, Chang S.
Feng, Wuwei
Jiang, Xiaoning
Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
title Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
title_full Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
title_fullStr Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
title_full_unstemmed Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
title_short Numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
title_sort numerical and experimental evaluation of low‐intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation
topic THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36342303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mp.16090
work_keys_str_mv AT chenmengyue numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT pengchang numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT wuhuaiyu numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT huangchihchung numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT kimtaewon numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT traylorzachary numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT mullermarie numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT chhatbarpratiky numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT namchangs numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT fengwuwei numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation
AT jiangxiaoning numericalandexperimentalevaluationoflowintensitytranscranialfocusedultrasoundwavepropagationusinghumanskullsforbrainneuromodulation