Cargando…

Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective

The C3 “Tickover” hypothesis, a mechanism whereby the host maintains constant surveillance of potential invading pathogens, targeting them for elimination through amplified C3b generation and C3‐dependent effector mechanisms, was proposed by the late Professor Peter Lachmann in 1973. This unique ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Peters, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.13165
_version_ 1785025125061492736
author Peters, Keith
author_facet Peters, Keith
author_sort Peters, Keith
collection PubMed
description The C3 “Tickover” hypothesis, a mechanism whereby the host maintains constant surveillance of potential invading pathogens, targeting them for elimination through amplified C3b generation and C3‐dependent effector mechanisms, was proposed by the late Professor Peter Lachmann in 1973. This unique insight came from a combined understanding of the complement system as it was then defined and the nature of the disease process in rare complement deficiencies and complement‐driven diseases. In this review, I give a personal perspective of how understanding of “Tickover” has developed in the subsequent 50 years, culminating in the introduction into the clinic of therapeutic agents designed to combat amplification‐driven disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100997612023-04-14 Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective Peters, Keith Immunol Rev Invited Reviews The C3 “Tickover” hypothesis, a mechanism whereby the host maintains constant surveillance of potential invading pathogens, targeting them for elimination through amplified C3b generation and C3‐dependent effector mechanisms, was proposed by the late Professor Peter Lachmann in 1973. This unique insight came from a combined understanding of the complement system as it was then defined and the nature of the disease process in rare complement deficiencies and complement‐driven diseases. In this review, I give a personal perspective of how understanding of “Tickover” has developed in the subsequent 50 years, culminating in the introduction into the clinic of therapeutic agents designed to combat amplification‐driven disease. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-21 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10099761/ /pubmed/36408746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.13165 Text en © 2022 The Author. Immunological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Reviews
Peters, Keith
Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective
title Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective
title_full Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective
title_fullStr Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective
title_full_unstemmed Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective
title_short Physiology and pathology of the C3 amplification cycle: A retrospective
title_sort physiology and pathology of the c3 amplification cycle: a retrospective
topic Invited Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36408746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.13165
work_keys_str_mv AT peterskeith physiologyandpathologyofthec3amplificationcyclearetrospective