Cargando…

Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study

PURPOSE: To compare marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants in a group of bruxers in relation to a matched group of non‐bruxers. METHODS: The present record‐based retrospective study included patients selected from individuals treated with dental implants at one specialist clinic in Malmö. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bredberg, Clara, Vu, Camila, Häggman‐Henrikson, Birgitta, Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13161
_version_ 1785025131118067712
author Bredberg, Clara
Vu, Camila
Häggman‐Henrikson, Birgitta
Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
author_facet Bredberg, Clara
Vu, Camila
Häggman‐Henrikson, Birgitta
Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
author_sort Bredberg, Clara
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants in a group of bruxers in relation to a matched group of non‐bruxers. METHODS: The present record‐based retrospective study included patients selected from individuals treated with dental implants at one specialist clinic in Malmö. Only implants not lost and with baseline radiographs taken within 12 months after implant placement and with a minimum of 36 months of radiological follow‐up were considered for inclusion. Univariate linear regression models and a linear mixed‐effects model were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients (104 bruxers, 100 non‐bruxers), with a total of 811 implants (416 in bruxers, 395 in non‐bruxers) were included in the study. The results of the linear mixed‐effects model suggested that bruxism, smoking, age, region of the jaws, implant diameter, and prosthesis type had a statistically significant influence on MBL over time. Individuals who are both bruxers and smokers showed greater MBL when compared to individuals who are either a bruxer or smoker, or neither (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bruxism is suggested to increase the risk of MBL over time, as well as higher age, smoking, and the combination of bruxism and smoking. Other factors that showed a correlation with increased MBL were implant diameter, region of the jaws, and prosthesis type, but it is not possible to draw robust conclusions for these factors, as the categories of these variables were very unbalanced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100997922023-04-14 Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study Bredberg, Clara Vu, Camila Häggman‐Henrikson, Birgitta Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles PURPOSE: To compare marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants in a group of bruxers in relation to a matched group of non‐bruxers. METHODS: The present record‐based retrospective study included patients selected from individuals treated with dental implants at one specialist clinic in Malmö. Only implants not lost and with baseline radiographs taken within 12 months after implant placement and with a minimum of 36 months of radiological follow‐up were considered for inclusion. Univariate linear regression models and a linear mixed‐effects model were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients (104 bruxers, 100 non‐bruxers), with a total of 811 implants (416 in bruxers, 395 in non‐bruxers) were included in the study. The results of the linear mixed‐effects model suggested that bruxism, smoking, age, region of the jaws, implant diameter, and prosthesis type had a statistically significant influence on MBL over time. Individuals who are both bruxers and smokers showed greater MBL when compared to individuals who are either a bruxer or smoker, or neither (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bruxism is suggested to increase the risk of MBL over time, as well as higher age, smoking, and the combination of bruxism and smoking. Other factors that showed a correlation with increased MBL were implant diameter, region of the jaws, and prosthesis type, but it is not possible to draw robust conclusions for these factors, as the categories of these variables were very unbalanced. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-21 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10099792/ /pubmed/36411179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13161 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bredberg, Clara
Vu, Camila
Häggman‐Henrikson, Birgitta
Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos
Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study
title Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study
title_full Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study
title_fullStr Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study
title_short Marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: A retrospective case–control study
title_sort marginal bone loss around dental implants: comparison between matched groups of bruxer and non‐bruxer patients: a retrospective case–control study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36411179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13161
work_keys_str_mv AT bredbergclara marginalbonelossarounddentalimplantscomparisonbetweenmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatientsaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT vucamila marginalbonelossarounddentalimplantscomparisonbetweenmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatientsaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT haggmanhenriksonbirgitta marginalbonelossarounddentalimplantscomparisonbetweenmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatientsaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT chrcanovicbrunoramos marginalbonelossarounddentalimplantscomparisonbetweenmatchedgroupsofbruxerandnonbruxerpatientsaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy