Cargando…
High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting
Real‐world evidence used for regulatory, payer, and clinical decision‐making requires principled epidemiology in design and analysis, applying methods to minimize confounding given the lack of randomization. One technique to deal with potential confounding is propensity score (PS) analysis, which al...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5566 |
_version_ | 1785025151746703360 |
---|---|
author | Rassen, Jeremy A. Blin, Patrick Kloss, Sebastian Neugebauer, Romain S. Platt, Robert W. Pottegård, Anton Schneeweiss, Sebastian Toh, Sengwee |
author_facet | Rassen, Jeremy A. Blin, Patrick Kloss, Sebastian Neugebauer, Romain S. Platt, Robert W. Pottegård, Anton Schneeweiss, Sebastian Toh, Sengwee |
author_sort | Rassen, Jeremy A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Real‐world evidence used for regulatory, payer, and clinical decision‐making requires principled epidemiology in design and analysis, applying methods to minimize confounding given the lack of randomization. One technique to deal with potential confounding is propensity score (PS) analysis, which allows for the adjustment for measured preexposure covariates. Since its first publication in 2009, the high‐dimensional propensity score (hdPS) method has emerged as an approach that extends traditional PS covariate selection to include large numbers of covariates that may reduce confounding bias in the analysis of healthcare databases. hdPS is an automated, data‐driven analytic approach for covariate selection that empirically identifies preexposure variables and proxies to include in the PS model. This article provides an overview of the hdPS approach and recommendations on the planning, implementation, and reporting of hdPS used for causal treatment‐effect estimations in longitudinal healthcare databases. We supply a checklist with key considerations as a supportive decision tool to aid investigators in the implementation and transparent reporting of hdPS techniques, and to aid decision‐makers unfamiliar with hdPS in the understanding and interpretation of studies employing this approach. This article is endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10099872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100998722023-04-14 High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting Rassen, Jeremy A. Blin, Patrick Kloss, Sebastian Neugebauer, Romain S. Platt, Robert W. Pottegård, Anton Schneeweiss, Sebastian Toh, Sengwee Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology Real‐world evidence used for regulatory, payer, and clinical decision‐making requires principled epidemiology in design and analysis, applying methods to minimize confounding given the lack of randomization. One technique to deal with potential confounding is propensity score (PS) analysis, which allows for the adjustment for measured preexposure covariates. Since its first publication in 2009, the high‐dimensional propensity score (hdPS) method has emerged as an approach that extends traditional PS covariate selection to include large numbers of covariates that may reduce confounding bias in the analysis of healthcare databases. hdPS is an automated, data‐driven analytic approach for covariate selection that empirically identifies preexposure variables and proxies to include in the PS model. This article provides an overview of the hdPS approach and recommendations on the planning, implementation, and reporting of hdPS used for causal treatment‐effect estimations in longitudinal healthcare databases. We supply a checklist with key considerations as a supportive decision tool to aid investigators in the implementation and transparent reporting of hdPS techniques, and to aid decision‐makers unfamiliar with hdPS in the understanding and interpretation of studies employing this approach. This article is endorsed by the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-22 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10099872/ /pubmed/36349471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5566 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology Rassen, Jeremy A. Blin, Patrick Kloss, Sebastian Neugebauer, Romain S. Platt, Robert W. Pottegård, Anton Schneeweiss, Sebastian Toh, Sengwee High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting |
title | High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting |
title_full | High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting |
title_fullStr | High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting |
title_full_unstemmed | High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting |
title_short | High‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: Planning, implementation, and reporting |
title_sort | high‐dimensional propensity scores for empirical covariate selection in secondary database studies: planning, implementation, and reporting |
topic | Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5566 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rassenjeremya highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT blinpatrick highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT klosssebastian highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT neugebauerromains highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT plattrobertw highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT pottegardanton highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT schneeweisssebastian highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting AT tohsengwee highdimensionalpropensityscoresforempiricalcovariateselectioninsecondarydatabasestudiesplanningimplementationandreporting |