Cargando…

Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: PARP (poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase) inhibitors (PARPi) are now standard of care in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with select mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways, but patients with ATM‐ and BRCA2 mutations may respond differently to PARPi. We hypo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Christopher T., Nizialek, Emily, Berchuck, Jacob E., Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J., Ashkar, Ryan, Sokolova, Alexandra, Barata, Pedro C., Aggarwal, Rahul R., McKay, Rana R., Agarwal, Neeraj, McClure, Heather M., Nafissi, Nellie, Bryce, Alan H., Sartor, Oliver, Sayegh, Nicolas, Cheng, Heather H., Adra, Nabil, Sternberg, Cora N., Taplin, Mary‐Ellen, Cieslik, Marcin, Alva, Ajjai S., Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36382533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.24454
_version_ 1785025151983681536
author Su, Christopher T.
Nizialek, Emily
Berchuck, Jacob E.
Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.
Ashkar, Ryan
Sokolova, Alexandra
Barata, Pedro C.
Aggarwal, Rahul R.
McKay, Rana R.
Agarwal, Neeraj
McClure, Heather M.
Nafissi, Nellie
Bryce, Alan H.
Sartor, Oliver
Sayegh, Nicolas
Cheng, Heather H.
Adra, Nabil
Sternberg, Cora N.
Taplin, Mary‐Ellen
Cieslik, Marcin
Alva, Ajjai S.
Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
author_facet Su, Christopher T.
Nizialek, Emily
Berchuck, Jacob E.
Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.
Ashkar, Ryan
Sokolova, Alexandra
Barata, Pedro C.
Aggarwal, Rahul R.
McKay, Rana R.
Agarwal, Neeraj
McClure, Heather M.
Nafissi, Nellie
Bryce, Alan H.
Sartor, Oliver
Sayegh, Nicolas
Cheng, Heather H.
Adra, Nabil
Sternberg, Cora N.
Taplin, Mary‐Ellen
Cieslik, Marcin
Alva, Ajjai S.
Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
author_sort Su, Christopher T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: PARP (poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase) inhibitors (PARPi) are now standard of care in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with select mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways, but patients with ATM‐ and BRCA2 mutations may respond differently to PARPi. We hypothesized that differences may also exist in response to taxanes, which may inform treatment sequencing decisions. METHODS: mCRPC patients (N = 158) with deleterious ATM or BRCA2 mutations who received taxanes, PARPi, or both were retrospectively identified from 11 US academic centers. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were collected. Kaplan−Meier analyses were performed and Cox hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for progression‐free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS), from time of first taxane or PARPi therapy. RESULTS: Fifty‐eight patients with ATM mutations and 100 with BRCA2 mutations were identified. Fourty‐four (76%) patients with ATM mutations received taxane only or taxane before PARPi, while 14 (24%) received PARPi only or PARPi before taxane. Patients with ATM mutations had longer PFS when taxane was given first versus PARPi given first (HR: 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37−1.50]; p = 0.40). Similarly, OS was longer in patients with ATM mutations who received taxane first (HR: 0.56 [CI: 0.20−1.54]; p = 0.26). Among patients with BRCA2 mutations, 51 (51%) received taxane first and 49 (49%) received PARPi first. In contrast, patients with BRCA2 mutations had longer PFS when PARPi was given first versus taxane given first (HR: 0.85 [CI: 0.54−1.35]; p = 0.49). Similarly, OS was longer in patients with BRCA2 mutations who received PARPi first (HR: 0.75 [CI: 0.41−1.37]; p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective data suggest differential response between ATM and BRCA2 mutated prostate cancers in terms of response to PARPi and to taxane chemotherapy. When considering the sequence of PARPi versus taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC with DDR mutations, ATM, and BRCA2 mutation status may be helpful in guiding choice of initial therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10099873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100998732023-04-14 Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer Su, Christopher T. Nizialek, Emily Berchuck, Jacob E. Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J. Ashkar, Ryan Sokolova, Alexandra Barata, Pedro C. Aggarwal, Rahul R. McKay, Rana R. Agarwal, Neeraj McClure, Heather M. Nafissi, Nellie Bryce, Alan H. Sartor, Oliver Sayegh, Nicolas Cheng, Heather H. Adra, Nabil Sternberg, Cora N. Taplin, Mary‐Ellen Cieslik, Marcin Alva, Ajjai S. Antonarakis, Emmanuel S. Prostate Original Articles BACKGROUND: PARP (poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase) inhibitors (PARPi) are now standard of care in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with select mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways, but patients with ATM‐ and BRCA2 mutations may respond differently to PARPi. We hypothesized that differences may also exist in response to taxanes, which may inform treatment sequencing decisions. METHODS: mCRPC patients (N = 158) with deleterious ATM or BRCA2 mutations who received taxanes, PARPi, or both were retrospectively identified from 11 US academic centers. Demographic, treatment, and survival data were collected. Kaplan−Meier analyses were performed and Cox hazard ratios (HR) were calculated for progression‐free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS), from time of first taxane or PARPi therapy. RESULTS: Fifty‐eight patients with ATM mutations and 100 with BRCA2 mutations were identified. Fourty‐four (76%) patients with ATM mutations received taxane only or taxane before PARPi, while 14 (24%) received PARPi only or PARPi before taxane. Patients with ATM mutations had longer PFS when taxane was given first versus PARPi given first (HR: 0.74 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37−1.50]; p = 0.40). Similarly, OS was longer in patients with ATM mutations who received taxane first (HR: 0.56 [CI: 0.20−1.54]; p = 0.26). Among patients with BRCA2 mutations, 51 (51%) received taxane first and 49 (49%) received PARPi first. In contrast, patients with BRCA2 mutations had longer PFS when PARPi was given first versus taxane given first (HR: 0.85 [CI: 0.54−1.35]; p = 0.49). Similarly, OS was longer in patients with BRCA2 mutations who received PARPi first (HR: 0.75 [CI: 0.41−1.37]; p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective data suggest differential response between ATM and BRCA2 mutated prostate cancers in terms of response to PARPi and to taxane chemotherapy. When considering the sequence of PARPi versus taxane chemotherapy for mCRPC with DDR mutations, ATM, and BRCA2 mutation status may be helpful in guiding choice of initial therapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-16 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10099873/ /pubmed/36382533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.24454 Text en © 2022 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Su, Christopher T.
Nizialek, Emily
Berchuck, Jacob E.
Vlachostergios, Panagiotis J.
Ashkar, Ryan
Sokolova, Alexandra
Barata, Pedro C.
Aggarwal, Rahul R.
McKay, Rana R.
Agarwal, Neeraj
McClure, Heather M.
Nafissi, Nellie
Bryce, Alan H.
Sartor, Oliver
Sayegh, Nicolas
Cheng, Heather H.
Adra, Nabil
Sternberg, Cora N.
Taplin, Mary‐Ellen
Cieslik, Marcin
Alva, Ajjai S.
Antonarakis, Emmanuel S.
Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
title Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
title_full Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
title_fullStr Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
title_short Differential responses to taxanes and PARP inhibitors in ATM‐ versus BRCA2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
title_sort differential responses to taxanes and parp inhibitors in atm‐ versus brca2‐mutated metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36382533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.24454
work_keys_str_mv AT suchristophert differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT nizialekemily differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT berchuckjacobe differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT vlachostergiospanagiotisj differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT ashkarryan differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT sokolovaalexandra differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT baratapedroc differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT aggarwalrahulr differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT mckayranar differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT agarwalneeraj differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT mcclureheatherm differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT nafissinellie differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT brycealanh differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT sartoroliver differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT sayeghnicolas differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT chengheatherh differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT adranabil differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT sternbergcoran differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT taplinmaryellen differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT cieslikmarcin differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT alvaajjais differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer
AT antonarakisemmanuels differentialresponsestotaxanesandparpinhibitorsinatmversusbrca2mutatedmetastaticcastrateresistantprostatecancer