Cargando…

Proof of concept and feasibility of a blended physiotherapy intervention for persons with haemophilic arthropathy

BACKGROUND: Regular physiotherapy with a physiotherapist experienced in the field is not feasible for many patients with haemophilia. We, therefore, developed a blended physiotherapy intervention for persons with haemophilic arthropathy (HA) (e‐Exercise HA), integrating face‐to‐face physiotherapy wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmer, Merel A., Kuijlaars, Isolde A. R., Kloek, Corelien, de Kleijn, Piet, Schutgens, Roger E. G., Veenhof, Cindy, Pisters, Martijn F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10099997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36395788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hae.14690
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Regular physiotherapy with a physiotherapist experienced in the field is not feasible for many patients with haemophilia. We, therefore, developed a blended physiotherapy intervention for persons with haemophilic arthropathy (HA) (e‐Exercise HA), integrating face‐to‐face physiotherapy with a smartphone application. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine proof of concept of e‐ Exercise HA and to evaluate feasibility. METHODS: Proof of concept was evaluated by a single‐case multiple baseline design. Physical activity (PA) was measured with an accelerometer during a baseline, intervention and post‐intervention phase and analysed using visual inspection and a single case randomisation test. Changes in limitations in activities (Haemophilia Activities List [HAL]) and a General Perceived Effect (GPE) were evaluated between baseline (T0), post‐intervention (T1) and 3 months post‐intervention (T2) using Wilcoxson signed rank test. Feasibility was evaluated by the number of adverse events, attended sessions and open‐ended questions. RESULTS: Nine patients with HA (90% severe, median age 57.5 (quartiles 50.5–63.3) and median HJHS 32 (quartiles 22–36)) were included. PA increased in two patients. HAL increased mean 15 (SD 9) points (p = .001) at T1, and decrease to mean +8 points (SD 7) (p = .012) at T2 compared to T0. At T1 and T2 8/9 participants scored a GPE > 3. Median 5 (range 4–7) face‐to‐face sessions were attended and a median 8 out of 12 information modules were viewed. No intervention‐related bleeds were reported. CONCLUSION: A blended physiotherapy intervention is feasible for persons with HA and the first indication of the effectiveness of the intervention in decreasing limitations in activities was observed.