Cargando…

Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review

Haemorrhagic shock after trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in young individuals. Despite advances in trauma systems and resuscitation strategies, mortality from haemorrhagic shock has not declined over the previous two decades. A proportion of shocked trauma patients may exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hogarty, Joseph P, Jones, Morgan E, Jassal, Karishma, Hogarty, Daniel T, Mitra, Biswadev, Udy, Andrew A, Fitzgerald, Mark C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10100146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14129
_version_ 1785025212856664064
author Hogarty, Joseph P
Jones, Morgan E
Jassal, Karishma
Hogarty, Daniel T
Mitra, Biswadev
Udy, Andrew A
Fitzgerald, Mark C
author_facet Hogarty, Joseph P
Jones, Morgan E
Jassal, Karishma
Hogarty, Daniel T
Mitra, Biswadev
Udy, Andrew A
Fitzgerald, Mark C
author_sort Hogarty, Joseph P
collection PubMed
description Haemorrhagic shock after trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in young individuals. Despite advances in trauma systems and resuscitation strategies, mortality from haemorrhagic shock has not declined over the previous two decades. A proportion of shocked trauma patients may experience a deficiency of cortisol relative to the severity of their injury. The benefit of exogenous steroid administration in patients suffering haemorrhagic shock as a result of injury is unclear. A systematic review of four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane, Scopus) was undertaken. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre‐determined and two reviewers independently screened the articles with disagreements arbitrated by a third reviewer. The primary outcome variable was 28‐day mortality. Quality of studies were assessed using the Cochrane‐risk‐of‐bias (RoB 2) tool. Of the 2919 studies yielded by the search strategy, 1274 duplicates were removed and 1645 screened on title and abstract. After the full text of 33 studies were assessed, two articles were included. Both studies were over 30 years old with small numbers of participants and with primary outcomes not including mortality. Of the data available, no statistically significant difference in mortality was detected. Hospital length of stay, reversal of shock or adverse events were not reported. Both studies were at risk of bias. There are no high quality or recent studies in the English literature investigating the use of steroids for haemorrhagic shocked trauma patients. PROSPERO: CRD42021239656.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10100146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101001462023-04-14 Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review Hogarty, Joseph P Jones, Morgan E Jassal, Karishma Hogarty, Daniel T Mitra, Biswadev Udy, Andrew A Fitzgerald, Mark C Emerg Med Australas Review Articles Haemorrhagic shock after trauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, particularly in young individuals. Despite advances in trauma systems and resuscitation strategies, mortality from haemorrhagic shock has not declined over the previous two decades. A proportion of shocked trauma patients may experience a deficiency of cortisol relative to the severity of their injury. The benefit of exogenous steroid administration in patients suffering haemorrhagic shock as a result of injury is unclear. A systematic review of four databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane, Scopus) was undertaken. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre‐determined and two reviewers independently screened the articles with disagreements arbitrated by a third reviewer. The primary outcome variable was 28‐day mortality. Quality of studies were assessed using the Cochrane‐risk‐of‐bias (RoB 2) tool. Of the 2919 studies yielded by the search strategy, 1274 duplicates were removed and 1645 screened on title and abstract. After the full text of 33 studies were assessed, two articles were included. Both studies were over 30 years old with small numbers of participants and with primary outcomes not including mortality. Of the data available, no statistically significant difference in mortality was detected. Hospital length of stay, reversal of shock or adverse events were not reported. Both studies were at risk of bias. There are no high quality or recent studies in the English literature investigating the use of steroids for haemorrhagic shocked trauma patients. PROSPERO: CRD42021239656. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2022-11-08 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10100146/ /pubmed/36347522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14129 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Hogarty, Joseph P
Jones, Morgan E
Jassal, Karishma
Hogarty, Daniel T
Mitra, Biswadev
Udy, Andrew A
Fitzgerald, Mark C
Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review
title Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review
title_full Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review
title_fullStr Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review
title_short Review article: Early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: A systematic review
title_sort review article: early steroid administration for traumatic haemorrhagic shock: a systematic review
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10100146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36347522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14129
work_keys_str_mv AT hogartyjosephp reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview
AT jonesmorgane reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview
AT jassalkarishma reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview
AT hogartydanielt reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview
AT mitrabiswadev reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview
AT udyandrewa reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview
AT fitzgeraldmarkc reviewarticleearlysteroidadministrationfortraumatichaemorrhagicshockasystematicreview