Cargando…

Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: Critical flicker‐fusion frequency (CFF) has been used in clinical studies as a measure of visual fatigue. We examine the correlation between CFF and subjective reports of visual fatigue in a group of symptomatic computer users, to consider whether CFF may be used as a surrogate measure of v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Sumeer, Downie, Laura E., Anderson, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10100408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13073
_version_ 1785025271845355520
author Singh, Sumeer
Downie, Laura E.
Anderson, Andrew J.
author_facet Singh, Sumeer
Downie, Laura E.
Anderson, Andrew J.
author_sort Singh, Sumeer
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Critical flicker‐fusion frequency (CFF) has been used in clinical studies as a measure of visual fatigue. We examine the correlation between CFF and subjective reports of visual fatigue in a group of symptomatic computer users, to consider whether CFF may be used as a surrogate measure of visual fatigue symptoms. METHODS: We analysed data from a previous randomised controlled trial. One hundred and twenty adults, diagnosed with computer vision syndrome, had CFF and visual fatigue symptoms quantified before and after a visually demanding 2‐h computer task. Symptoms were assessed using a questionnaire with nine subcomponents that summed to a total score of 900. CFF was measured using a two‐interval forced‐choice method, with the flicker rate altered by a computer‐controlled staircase procedure. For our primary analysis, we determined Spearman correlation coefficients between post‐task symptom scores and CFF, and between change from baseline symptom scores and CFF. We also used a bootstrap procedure to consider whether symptom score subcomponents were significantly (Bonferroni‐corrected) different from overall scores with regard to their correlations with CFF. RESULTS: Although visual fatigue symptom scores altered significantly post‐task (mean change: 92 units; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11 to 122), CFF did not (mean change −0.7 Hz; 95% CI: −1.7 to 0.3). There was no significant correlation between overall symptom scores and CFF, either for the post‐task (r = −0.13; 95% CI: −0.31 to 0.05) or the change from baseline (r = −0.18; 95% CI: −0.35 to 0.01) analysis. Subcomponents of the symptom questionnaire did not show a significant correlation with CFF, either for the post‐task or the change from baseline analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We find that CFF is not a useful surrogate for symptoms of visual fatigue, given its low correlation with scores on a visual fatigue symptom questionnaire.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10100408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101004082023-04-14 Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial Singh, Sumeer Downie, Laura E. Anderson, Andrew J. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Original Articles PURPOSE: Critical flicker‐fusion frequency (CFF) has been used in clinical studies as a measure of visual fatigue. We examine the correlation between CFF and subjective reports of visual fatigue in a group of symptomatic computer users, to consider whether CFF may be used as a surrogate measure of visual fatigue symptoms. METHODS: We analysed data from a previous randomised controlled trial. One hundred and twenty adults, diagnosed with computer vision syndrome, had CFF and visual fatigue symptoms quantified before and after a visually demanding 2‐h computer task. Symptoms were assessed using a questionnaire with nine subcomponents that summed to a total score of 900. CFF was measured using a two‐interval forced‐choice method, with the flicker rate altered by a computer‐controlled staircase procedure. For our primary analysis, we determined Spearman correlation coefficients between post‐task symptom scores and CFF, and between change from baseline symptom scores and CFF. We also used a bootstrap procedure to consider whether symptom score subcomponents were significantly (Bonferroni‐corrected) different from overall scores with regard to their correlations with CFF. RESULTS: Although visual fatigue symptom scores altered significantly post‐task (mean change: 92 units; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11 to 122), CFF did not (mean change −0.7 Hz; 95% CI: −1.7 to 0.3). There was no significant correlation between overall symptom scores and CFF, either for the post‐task (r = −0.13; 95% CI: −0.31 to 0.05) or the change from baseline (r = −0.18; 95% CI: −0.35 to 0.01) analysis. Subcomponents of the symptom questionnaire did not show a significant correlation with CFF, either for the post‐task or the change from baseline analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We find that CFF is not a useful surrogate for symptoms of visual fatigue, given its low correlation with scores on a visual fatigue symptom questionnaire. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-23 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10100408/ /pubmed/36416367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13073 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Singh, Sumeer
Downie, Laura E.
Anderson, Andrew J.
Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
title Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
title_full Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
title_short Is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? A post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
title_sort is critical flicker‐fusion frequency a valid measure of visual fatigue? a post‐hoc analysis of a double‐masked randomised controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10100408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/opo.13073
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsumeer iscriticalflickerfusionfrequencyavalidmeasureofvisualfatigueaposthocanalysisofadoublemaskedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT downielaurae iscriticalflickerfusionfrequencyavalidmeasureofvisualfatigueaposthocanalysisofadoublemaskedrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT andersonandrewj iscriticalflickerfusionfrequencyavalidmeasureofvisualfatigueaposthocanalysisofadoublemaskedrandomisedcontrolledtrial