Cargando…
Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report
Reverse sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can cause serious ophthalmic complications. Even routine ocular examinations can provoke significant consequences. Herein, we present a case of recurrent pupillary capture and pseudophakic pupillary block related to reverse sulcus IOL implantation....
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033496 |
_version_ | 1785025470416289792 |
---|---|
author | Funarunart, Panrapee Treesit, Isaraporn |
author_facet | Funarunart, Panrapee Treesit, Isaraporn |
author_sort | Funarunart, Panrapee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reverse sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can cause serious ophthalmic complications. Even routine ocular examinations can provoke significant consequences. Herein, we present a case of recurrent pupillary capture and pseudophakic pupillary block related to reverse sulcus IOL implantation. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man developed a pseudophakic pupillary block after pupil dilation aimed at relieving pupillary capture in an undetected reverse position of the sulcus IOL. The pupillary block was successfully treated with 2% pilocarpine and laser peripheral iridotomywas performed to prevent recurrence. The patient experienced recurrent pupillary capture with decreased vision in the affected eye. IOL exchange was the definite treatment resulting in improved vision and proper positioning of the IOL. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: When the reverse position of sulcus IOL is detected postoperatively, prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy should be considered to prevent pupillary block particularly when pupillary capture is present. Pharmacologic pupillary dilation should be performed cautiously. Recurrent pupillary capture is possible and IOL repositioning should be considered to prevent further complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10101256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101012562023-04-14 Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report Funarunart, Panrapee Treesit, Isaraporn Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 Reverse sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation can cause serious ophthalmic complications. Even routine ocular examinations can provoke significant consequences. Herein, we present a case of recurrent pupillary capture and pseudophakic pupillary block related to reverse sulcus IOL implantation. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old man developed a pseudophakic pupillary block after pupil dilation aimed at relieving pupillary capture in an undetected reverse position of the sulcus IOL. The pupillary block was successfully treated with 2% pilocarpine and laser peripheral iridotomywas performed to prevent recurrence. The patient experienced recurrent pupillary capture with decreased vision in the affected eye. IOL exchange was the definite treatment resulting in improved vision and proper positioning of the IOL. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: When the reverse position of sulcus IOL is detected postoperatively, prophylactic laser peripheral iridotomy should be considered to prevent pupillary block particularly when pupillary capture is present. Pharmacologic pupillary dilation should be performed cautiously. Recurrent pupillary capture is possible and IOL repositioning should be considered to prevent further complications. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10101256/ /pubmed/37058055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033496 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 5800 Funarunart, Panrapee Treesit, Isaraporn Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report |
title | Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report |
title_full | Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report |
title_fullStr | Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report |
title_short | Pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: A case report |
title_sort | pseudophakic pupillary block after reverse sulcus intraocular lens implantation: a case report |
topic | 5800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT funarunartpanrapee pseudophakicpupillaryblockafterreversesulcusintraocularlensimplantationacasereport AT treesitisaraporn pseudophakicpupillaryblockafterreversesulcusintraocularlensimplantationacasereport |