Cargando…

Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study

This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of the Medis flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) with those of the Ambu AuraFlex FLMA in pediatric ophthalmic surgery. A total of 80 patients, aged 1 to 5 years, in American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II, weighing ≥10 kg, and without any existin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wang, Lin-Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033544
_version_ 1785025480165949440
author Wang, Lin-Ling
author_facet Wang, Lin-Ling
author_sort Wang, Lin-Ling
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of the Medis flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) with those of the Ambu AuraFlex FLMA in pediatric ophthalmic surgery. A total of 80 patients, aged 1 to 5 years, in American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II, weighing ≥10 kg, and without any existing airway difficulties, were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into Group M (Medis FLMA) and Group A (Ambu AuraFlex FLMA). The time of insertion, number of attempts, finger assistance required, manipulation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), fiberoptic grade of view, and complications such as bloodstaining, hoarseness, and sore throat were recorded. Group M showed a significantly higher OLP than did Group A (P = .002); however, Group M required more finger assistance than did Group A (P = .009). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of insertion time, number of attempts, manipulation, fiberoptic view grade, or complications. Both the Medis and Ambu AuraFlex FLMA can provide smooth ventilation during pediatric ophthalmic surgeries. The Medis FLMA showed a higher OLP than did the Ambu AuraFlex FLMA but required more finger assistance during insertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10101296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101012962023-04-14 Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study Wang, Lin-Ling Medicine (Baltimore) 6200 This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of the Medis flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) with those of the Ambu AuraFlex FLMA in pediatric ophthalmic surgery. A total of 80 patients, aged 1 to 5 years, in American Society of Anesthesiologists I–II, weighing ≥10 kg, and without any existing airway difficulties, were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into Group M (Medis FLMA) and Group A (Ambu AuraFlex FLMA). The time of insertion, number of attempts, finger assistance required, manipulation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), fiberoptic grade of view, and complications such as bloodstaining, hoarseness, and sore throat were recorded. Group M showed a significantly higher OLP than did Group A (P = .002); however, Group M required more finger assistance than did Group A (P = .009). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of insertion time, number of attempts, manipulation, fiberoptic view grade, or complications. Both the Medis and Ambu AuraFlex FLMA can provide smooth ventilation during pediatric ophthalmic surgeries. The Medis FLMA showed a higher OLP than did the Ambu AuraFlex FLMA but required more finger assistance during insertion. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10101296/ /pubmed/37058023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033544 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 6200
Wang, Lin-Ling
Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study
title Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study
title_full Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study
title_short Comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: A retrospective study
title_sort comparison of two different flexible laryngeal airway masks in pediatric ophthalmic surgeries: a retrospective study
topic 6200
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033544
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglinling comparisonoftwodifferentflexiblelaryngealairwaymasksinpediatricophthalmicsurgeriesaretrospectivestudy