Cargando…
Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective “gold standard” tool. METHODS: The search strat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37053175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714 |
_version_ | 1785025516983549952 |
---|---|
author | Perez, Oriana Garza, Tatyana Hindera, Olivia Beltran, Alicia Musaad, Salma M. Dibbs, Tracey Singh, Anu Chug, Shria Sisson, Amy Kumar Vadathya, Anil Baranowski, Tom O’Connor, Teresia M. |
author_facet | Perez, Oriana Garza, Tatyana Hindera, Olivia Beltran, Alicia Musaad, Salma M. Dibbs, Tracey Singh, Anu Chug, Shria Sisson, Amy Kumar Vadathya, Anil Baranowski, Tom O’Connor, Teresia M. |
author_sort | Perez, Oriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective “gold standard” tool. METHODS: The search strategy was initially conducted in Medline Ovid and translated to Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo and Cochrane. A modified natural language search was conducted in Google Scholar and IEEE. The initial search was conducted in March 2021, and an updated search was conducted in June 2022. Additional studies were included from the references. Studies had to describe the validation of a tool to measure screen media use on participants of any age against a ‘gold standard’ or comparable objective measure. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) was used to assess the criterion validity. Four authors reviewed the titles in two rounds and extracted data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. Studies measured TV, computer, mobile device and social media site screen media use through: self or parent report, direct or video observation, computer and mobile device use tracking programs, and through other novel devices such as wearable devices and cameras. Correlations of self or parent report of screen media with the gold standard were lower than correlations of technology-based measures, and video observation with the gold standard. The COSMIN criterion validity ratings ranged from poor to excellent; most of the studies received a global score of fair or poor. CONCLUSIONS: Technology based validated tools that more directly measure screen use are emerging that have been validated against a gold standard for measuring screen use. However, practical, objective measures of diverse types of screen media use that have been tested on diverse populations are needed to better understand the impact of screen media use on the development and physical and mental health of children and adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10101444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101014442023-04-14 Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review Perez, Oriana Garza, Tatyana Hindera, Olivia Beltran, Alicia Musaad, Salma M. Dibbs, Tracey Singh, Anu Chug, Shria Sisson, Amy Kumar Vadathya, Anil Baranowski, Tom O’Connor, Teresia M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective “gold standard” tool. METHODS: The search strategy was initially conducted in Medline Ovid and translated to Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo and Cochrane. A modified natural language search was conducted in Google Scholar and IEEE. The initial search was conducted in March 2021, and an updated search was conducted in June 2022. Additional studies were included from the references. Studies had to describe the validation of a tool to measure screen media use on participants of any age against a ‘gold standard’ or comparable objective measure. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) was used to assess the criterion validity. Four authors reviewed the titles in two rounds and extracted data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. Studies measured TV, computer, mobile device and social media site screen media use through: self or parent report, direct or video observation, computer and mobile device use tracking programs, and through other novel devices such as wearable devices and cameras. Correlations of self or parent report of screen media with the gold standard were lower than correlations of technology-based measures, and video observation with the gold standard. The COSMIN criterion validity ratings ranged from poor to excellent; most of the studies received a global score of fair or poor. CONCLUSIONS: Technology based validated tools that more directly measure screen use are emerging that have been validated against a gold standard for measuring screen use. However, practical, objective measures of diverse types of screen media use that have been tested on diverse populations are needed to better understand the impact of screen media use on the development and physical and mental health of children and adults. Public Library of Science 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10101444/ /pubmed/37053175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714 Text en © 2023 Perez et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Perez, Oriana Garza, Tatyana Hindera, Olivia Beltran, Alicia Musaad, Salma M. Dibbs, Tracey Singh, Anu Chug, Shria Sisson, Amy Kumar Vadathya, Anil Baranowski, Tom O’Connor, Teresia M. Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review |
title | Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review |
title_full | Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review |
title_short | Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review |
title_sort | validated assessment tools for screen media use: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37053175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezoriana validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT garzatatyana validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT hinderaolivia validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT beltranalicia validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT musaadsalmam validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT dibbstracey validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT singhanu validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT chugshria validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT sissonamy validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT kumarvadathyaanil validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT baranowskitom validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview AT oconnorteresiam validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview |