Cargando…

Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective “gold standard” tool. METHODS: The search strat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez, Oriana, Garza, Tatyana, Hindera, Olivia, Beltran, Alicia, Musaad, Salma M., Dibbs, Tracey, Singh, Anu, Chug, Shria, Sisson, Amy, Kumar Vadathya, Anil, Baranowski, Tom, O’Connor, Teresia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37053175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714
_version_ 1785025516983549952
author Perez, Oriana
Garza, Tatyana
Hindera, Olivia
Beltran, Alicia
Musaad, Salma M.
Dibbs, Tracey
Singh, Anu
Chug, Shria
Sisson, Amy
Kumar Vadathya, Anil
Baranowski, Tom
O’Connor, Teresia M.
author_facet Perez, Oriana
Garza, Tatyana
Hindera, Olivia
Beltran, Alicia
Musaad, Salma M.
Dibbs, Tracey
Singh, Anu
Chug, Shria
Sisson, Amy
Kumar Vadathya, Anil
Baranowski, Tom
O’Connor, Teresia M.
author_sort Perez, Oriana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective “gold standard” tool. METHODS: The search strategy was initially conducted in Medline Ovid and translated to Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo and Cochrane. A modified natural language search was conducted in Google Scholar and IEEE. The initial search was conducted in March 2021, and an updated search was conducted in June 2022. Additional studies were included from the references. Studies had to describe the validation of a tool to measure screen media use on participants of any age against a ‘gold standard’ or comparable objective measure. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) was used to assess the criterion validity. Four authors reviewed the titles in two rounds and extracted data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. Studies measured TV, computer, mobile device and social media site screen media use through: self or parent report, direct or video observation, computer and mobile device use tracking programs, and through other novel devices such as wearable devices and cameras. Correlations of self or parent report of screen media with the gold standard were lower than correlations of technology-based measures, and video observation with the gold standard. The COSMIN criterion validity ratings ranged from poor to excellent; most of the studies received a global score of fair or poor. CONCLUSIONS: Technology based validated tools that more directly measure screen use are emerging that have been validated against a gold standard for measuring screen use. However, practical, objective measures of diverse types of screen media use that have been tested on diverse populations are needed to better understand the impact of screen media use on the development and physical and mental health of children and adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10101444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101014442023-04-14 Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review Perez, Oriana Garza, Tatyana Hindera, Olivia Beltran, Alicia Musaad, Salma M. Dibbs, Tracey Singh, Anu Chug, Shria Sisson, Amy Kumar Vadathya, Anil Baranowski, Tom O’Connor, Teresia M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective “gold standard” tool. METHODS: The search strategy was initially conducted in Medline Ovid and translated to Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo and Cochrane. A modified natural language search was conducted in Google Scholar and IEEE. The initial search was conducted in March 2021, and an updated search was conducted in June 2022. Additional studies were included from the references. Studies had to describe the validation of a tool to measure screen media use on participants of any age against a ‘gold standard’ or comparable objective measure. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) was used to assess the criterion validity. Four authors reviewed the titles in two rounds and extracted data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. Studies measured TV, computer, mobile device and social media site screen media use through: self or parent report, direct or video observation, computer and mobile device use tracking programs, and through other novel devices such as wearable devices and cameras. Correlations of self or parent report of screen media with the gold standard were lower than correlations of technology-based measures, and video observation with the gold standard. The COSMIN criterion validity ratings ranged from poor to excellent; most of the studies received a global score of fair or poor. CONCLUSIONS: Technology based validated tools that more directly measure screen use are emerging that have been validated against a gold standard for measuring screen use. However, practical, objective measures of diverse types of screen media use that have been tested on diverse populations are needed to better understand the impact of screen media use on the development and physical and mental health of children and adults. Public Library of Science 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10101444/ /pubmed/37053175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714 Text en © 2023 Perez et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perez, Oriana
Garza, Tatyana
Hindera, Olivia
Beltran, Alicia
Musaad, Salma M.
Dibbs, Tracey
Singh, Anu
Chug, Shria
Sisson, Amy
Kumar Vadathya, Anil
Baranowski, Tom
O’Connor, Teresia M.
Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
title Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
title_full Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
title_fullStr Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
title_short Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review
title_sort validated assessment tools for screen media use: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37053175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283714
work_keys_str_mv AT perezoriana validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT garzatatyana validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT hinderaolivia validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT beltranalicia validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT musaadsalmam validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT dibbstracey validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT singhanu validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT chugshria validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT sissonamy validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT kumarvadathyaanil validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT baranowskitom validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview
AT oconnorteresiam validatedassessmenttoolsforscreenmediauseasystematicreview