Cargando…

Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Jason, Ahmed, Naheed, Biel, Matthew, Patchen, Loral, Rethy, Janine, Thomas, Angela, Arem, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37053233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
_version_ 1785025530289979392
author Brown, Jason
Ahmed, Naheed
Biel, Matthew
Patchen, Loral
Rethy, Janine
Thomas, Angela
Arem, Hannah
author_facet Brown, Jason
Ahmed, Naheed
Biel, Matthew
Patchen, Loral
Rethy, Janine
Thomas, Angela
Arem, Hannah
author_sort Brown, Jason
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities. METHODS: We conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs. RESULTS: We found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings. CONCLUSION: Despite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10101493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101014932023-04-14 Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study Brown, Jason Ahmed, Naheed Biel, Matthew Patchen, Loral Rethy, Janine Thomas, Angela Arem, Hannah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities. METHODS: We conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs. RESULTS: We found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings. CONCLUSION: Despite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation. Public Library of Science 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10101493/ /pubmed/37053233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283815 Text en © 2023 Brown et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brown, Jason
Ahmed, Naheed
Biel, Matthew
Patchen, Loral
Rethy, Janine
Thomas, Angela
Arem, Hannah
Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
title Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
title_full Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
title_fullStr Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
title_short Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
title_sort considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in washington, dc: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37053233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
work_keys_str_mv AT brownjason considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy
AT ahmednaheed considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy
AT bielmatthew considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy
AT patchenloral considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy
AT rethyjanine considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy
AT thomasangela considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy
AT aremhannah considerationsinimplementationofsocialriskfactorscreeningandreferralinmaternalandinfantcareinwashingtondcaqualitativestudy