Cargando…
Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
PURPOSE: Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information. METHODS: An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x |
_version_ | 1785025590194077696 |
---|---|
author | Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Braat, Sabine Hammarberg, Karin Lew, Raelia Fisher, Jane Ledger, William Peate, Michelle |
author_facet | Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Braat, Sabine Hammarberg, Karin Lew, Raelia Fisher, Jane Ledger, William Peate, Michelle |
author_sort | Sandhu, Sherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information. METHODS: An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The survey covered POC information sources, information delivery preferences, POC and age-related infertility knowledge (study-specific scale), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and time spent considering POC. Target sample size (n=120) was determined using a precision-based method. RESULTS: Of 332 participants, 249 (75%) had considered POC, whilst 83 (25%) had not. Over half (54%) had searched for POC information. Fertility clinic websites were predominately used (70%). Most (73%) believed women should receive POC information between ages 19-30 years. Preferred information providers were fertility specialists (85%) and primary care physicians (81%). Other methods rated most useful to deliver POC information were online. Mean knowledge score was 8.9/14 (SD:2.3). For participants who had considered POC, mean DCS score was 57.1/100 (SD:27.2) and 78% had high decisional conflict (score >37.5). In regression, lower DCS scores were associated with every 1-point increase in knowledge score (-2.4; 95% CI [-3.9, -0.8]), consulting an IVF specialist (-17.5; [-28.0, -7.1]), and making a POC decision (-18.4; [-27.5, -9.3]). Median time to decision was 24-months (IQR: 12.0-36.0) (n=53). CONCLUSION: Women interested in receiving POC information had knowledge gaps, and wanted to be informed about the option by age 30 years from healthcare professionals and online resources. Most women who considered using POC had high decisional conflict indicating a need for decision support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10101825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101018252023-04-17 Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Braat, Sabine Hammarberg, Karin Lew, Raelia Fisher, Jane Ledger, William Peate, Michelle J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information. METHODS: An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The survey covered POC information sources, information delivery preferences, POC and age-related infertility knowledge (study-specific scale), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and time spent considering POC. Target sample size (n=120) was determined using a precision-based method. RESULTS: Of 332 participants, 249 (75%) had considered POC, whilst 83 (25%) had not. Over half (54%) had searched for POC information. Fertility clinic websites were predominately used (70%). Most (73%) believed women should receive POC information between ages 19-30 years. Preferred information providers were fertility specialists (85%) and primary care physicians (81%). Other methods rated most useful to deliver POC information were online. Mean knowledge score was 8.9/14 (SD:2.3). For participants who had considered POC, mean DCS score was 57.1/100 (SD:27.2) and 78% had high decisional conflict (score >37.5). In regression, lower DCS scores were associated with every 1-point increase in knowledge score (-2.4; 95% CI [-3.9, -0.8]), consulting an IVF specialist (-17.5; [-28.0, -7.1]), and making a POC decision (-18.4; [-27.5, -9.3]). Median time to decision was 24-months (IQR: 12.0-36.0) (n=53). CONCLUSION: Women interested in receiving POC information had knowledge gaps, and wanted to be informed about the option by age 30 years from healthcare professionals and online resources. Most women who considered using POC had high decisional conflict indicating a need for decision support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x. Springer US 2023-04-14 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10101825/ /pubmed/37058261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Assisted Reproduction Technologies Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Braat, Sabine Hammarberg, Karin Lew, Raelia Fisher, Jane Ledger, William Peate, Michelle Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
title | Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
title_full | Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
title_fullStr | Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
title_full_unstemmed | Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
title_short | Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
title_sort | information and decision support needs: a survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information |
topic | Assisted Reproduction Technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandhusherine informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT hickeymartha informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT braatsabine informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT hammarbergkarin informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT lewraelia informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT fisherjane informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT ledgerwilliam informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT peatemichelle informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation AT informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation |