Cargando…

Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information

PURPOSE: Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information. METHODS: An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandhu, Sherine, Hickey, Martha, Braat, Sabine, Hammarberg, Karin, Lew, Raelia, Fisher, Jane, Ledger, William, Peate, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x
_version_ 1785025590194077696
author Sandhu, Sherine
Hickey, Martha
Braat, Sabine
Hammarberg, Karin
Lew, Raelia
Fisher, Jane
Ledger, William
Peate, Michelle
author_facet Sandhu, Sherine
Hickey, Martha
Braat, Sabine
Hammarberg, Karin
Lew, Raelia
Fisher, Jane
Ledger, William
Peate, Michelle
author_sort Sandhu, Sherine
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information. METHODS: An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The survey covered POC information sources, information delivery preferences, POC and age-related infertility knowledge (study-specific scale), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and time spent considering POC. Target sample size (n=120) was determined using a precision-based method. RESULTS: Of 332 participants, 249 (75%) had considered POC, whilst 83 (25%) had not. Over half (54%) had searched for POC information. Fertility clinic websites were predominately used (70%). Most (73%) believed women should receive POC information between ages 19-30 years. Preferred information providers were fertility specialists (85%) and primary care physicians (81%). Other methods rated most useful to deliver POC information were online. Mean knowledge score was 8.9/14 (SD:2.3). For participants who had considered POC, mean DCS score was 57.1/100 (SD:27.2) and 78% had high decisional conflict (score >37.5). In regression, lower DCS scores were associated with every 1-point increase in knowledge score (-2.4; 95% CI [-3.9, -0.8]), consulting an IVF specialist (-17.5; [-28.0, -7.1]), and making a POC decision (-18.4; [-27.5, -9.3]). Median time to decision was 24-months (IQR: 12.0-36.0) (n=53). CONCLUSION: Women interested in receiving POC information had knowledge gaps, and wanted to be informed about the option by age 30 years from healthcare professionals and online resources. Most women who considered using POC had high decisional conflict indicating a need for decision support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10101825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101018252023-04-17 Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information Sandhu, Sherine Hickey, Martha Braat, Sabine Hammarberg, Karin Lew, Raelia Fisher, Jane Ledger, William Peate, Michelle J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: Identifying the information and decision support needs of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) information. METHODS: An online survey of Australian women, aged 18-45, interested in receiving POC information, proficient in English, with internet access. The survey covered POC information sources, information delivery preferences, POC and age-related infertility knowledge (study-specific scale), Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), and time spent considering POC. Target sample size (n=120) was determined using a precision-based method. RESULTS: Of 332 participants, 249 (75%) had considered POC, whilst 83 (25%) had not. Over half (54%) had searched for POC information. Fertility clinic websites were predominately used (70%). Most (73%) believed women should receive POC information between ages 19-30 years. Preferred information providers were fertility specialists (85%) and primary care physicians (81%). Other methods rated most useful to deliver POC information were online. Mean knowledge score was 8.9/14 (SD:2.3). For participants who had considered POC, mean DCS score was 57.1/100 (SD:27.2) and 78% had high decisional conflict (score >37.5). In regression, lower DCS scores were associated with every 1-point increase in knowledge score (-2.4; 95% CI [-3.9, -0.8]), consulting an IVF specialist (-17.5; [-28.0, -7.1]), and making a POC decision (-18.4; [-27.5, -9.3]). Median time to decision was 24-months (IQR: 12.0-36.0) (n=53). CONCLUSION: Women interested in receiving POC information had knowledge gaps, and wanted to be informed about the option by age 30 years from healthcare professionals and online resources. Most women who considered using POC had high decisional conflict indicating a need for decision support. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x. Springer US 2023-04-14 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10101825/ /pubmed/37058261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Sandhu, Sherine
Hickey, Martha
Braat, Sabine
Hammarberg, Karin
Lew, Raelia
Fisher, Jane
Ledger, William
Peate, Michelle
Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
title Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
title_full Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
title_fullStr Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
title_full_unstemmed Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
title_short Information and decision support needs: A survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
title_sort information and decision support needs: a survey of women interested in receiving planned oocyte cryopreservation information
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10101825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37058261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02796-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sandhusherine informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT hickeymartha informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT braatsabine informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT hammarbergkarin informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT lewraelia informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT fisherjane informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT ledgerwilliam informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT peatemichelle informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation
AT informationanddecisionsupportneedsasurveyofwomeninterestedinreceivingplannedoocytecryopreservationinformation