Cargando…
Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro reliability study was to determine the intra- and inter-examiner agreement of the revised FDI criteria including the categories “fracture of material and retention” (F1) and “caries at restoration margin” (B1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine photographs of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36399211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04771-9 |
_version_ | 1785025614758019072 |
---|---|
author | Mesinger, Sabine Heck, Katrin Crispin, Alexander Frankenberger, Roland Cadenaro, Milena Burgess, John Peschke, Arnd Heintze, Siegward D. Loomans, Bas Opdam, Niek Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan |
author_facet | Mesinger, Sabine Heck, Katrin Crispin, Alexander Frankenberger, Roland Cadenaro, Milena Burgess, John Peschke, Arnd Heintze, Siegward D. Loomans, Bas Opdam, Niek Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan |
author_sort | Mesinger, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro reliability study was to determine the intra- and inter-examiner agreement of the revised FDI criteria including the categories “fracture of material and retention” (F1) and “caries at restoration margin” (B1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine photographs of direct tooth-coloured posterior (n = 25) and anterior (n = 24) restorations with common deficiencies were included. Ten dental experts repeated the assessment in three blinded rounds. Later, the experts re-evaluated together all photographs and agreed on a reference standard. Statistical analysis included the calculation of Cohen’s (Cκ), Fleiss’ (Fκ), and weighted Kappa (wκ), the development of a logistic regression with a backward elimination model and Bland/Altman plots. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-examiner reliability exhibited mostly moderate to substantial Cκ, Fκ, and wκ values for posterior restorations (e.g. Intra: F1 Cκ = 0.57, wκ = 0.74; B1 Cκ = 0.57, wκ = 0.73/Inter F1 Fκ = 0.32, wκ = 0.53; B1 Fκ = 0.41, wκ = 0.64) and anterior restorations (e.g. Intra F1 Cκ = 0.63, wκ = 0.76; B1 Cκ = 0.48, wκ = 0.68/Inter F1 Fκ = 0.42, wκ = 0.57; B1 Fκ = 0.40, wκ = 0.51). Logistic regression analyses revealed significant differences between the evaluation rounds, examiners, categories, and tooth type. Both the intra- and inter-examiner reliability increased along with the evaluation rounds. The overall agreement was higher for anterior restorations compared to posterior restorations. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reliability of the revised FDI criteria set was found to be moderate to substantial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If properly trained, the revised FDI criteria set are a valid tool to evaluate direct and indirect restorations in a standardized way. However, training and calibration are needed to ensure reliable application. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04771-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10102028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101020282023-04-15 Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study Mesinger, Sabine Heck, Katrin Crispin, Alexander Frankenberger, Roland Cadenaro, Milena Burgess, John Peschke, Arnd Heintze, Siegward D. Loomans, Bas Opdam, Niek Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this in vitro reliability study was to determine the intra- and inter-examiner agreement of the revised FDI criteria including the categories “fracture of material and retention” (F1) and “caries at restoration margin” (B1). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine photographs of direct tooth-coloured posterior (n = 25) and anterior (n = 24) restorations with common deficiencies were included. Ten dental experts repeated the assessment in three blinded rounds. Later, the experts re-evaluated together all photographs and agreed on a reference standard. Statistical analysis included the calculation of Cohen’s (Cκ), Fleiss’ (Fκ), and weighted Kappa (wκ), the development of a logistic regression with a backward elimination model and Bland/Altman plots. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-examiner reliability exhibited mostly moderate to substantial Cκ, Fκ, and wκ values for posterior restorations (e.g. Intra: F1 Cκ = 0.57, wκ = 0.74; B1 Cκ = 0.57, wκ = 0.73/Inter F1 Fκ = 0.32, wκ = 0.53; B1 Fκ = 0.41, wκ = 0.64) and anterior restorations (e.g. Intra F1 Cκ = 0.63, wκ = 0.76; B1 Cκ = 0.48, wκ = 0.68/Inter F1 Fκ = 0.42, wκ = 0.57; B1 Fκ = 0.40, wκ = 0.51). Logistic regression analyses revealed significant differences between the evaluation rounds, examiners, categories, and tooth type. Both the intra- and inter-examiner reliability increased along with the evaluation rounds. The overall agreement was higher for anterior restorations compared to posterior restorations. CONCLUSIONS: The overall reliability of the revised FDI criteria set was found to be moderate to substantial. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If properly trained, the revised FDI criteria set are a valid tool to evaluate direct and indirect restorations in a standardized way. However, training and calibration are needed to ensure reliable application. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00784-022-04771-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10102028/ /pubmed/36399211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04771-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Mesinger, Sabine Heck, Katrin Crispin, Alexander Frankenberger, Roland Cadenaro, Milena Burgess, John Peschke, Arnd Heintze, Siegward D. Loomans, Bas Opdam, Niek Hickel, Reinhard Kühnisch, Jan Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study |
title | Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study |
title_full | Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study |
title_short | Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study |
title_sort | evaluation of direct restorations using the revised fdi criteria: results from a reliability study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36399211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04771-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mesingersabine evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT heckkatrin evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT crispinalexander evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT frankenbergerroland evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT cadenaromilena evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT burgessjohn evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT peschkearnd evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT heintzesiegwardd evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT loomansbas evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT opdamniek evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT hickelreinhard evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy AT kuhnischjan evaluationofdirectrestorationsusingtherevisedfdicriteriaresultsfromareliabilitystudy |