Cargando…

A pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating outdoor community walking for knee osteoarthritis: walk

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining outdoor walking on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural changes. METHOD: This was a 24-week parallel two-arm pilot RCT in Tasmania, Australia. KOA particip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drummen, S. J. J., Balogun, S., Lahham, A., Bennell, K., Hinman, R. S., Callisaya, M., Cai, G., Otahal, P., Winzenberg, T., Wang, Z., Antony, B., Munugoda, I. P., Martel-Pelletier, J., Pelletier, J. P., Abram, F., Jones, G., Aitken, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36692651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06477-5
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining outdoor walking on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) structural changes. METHOD: This was a 24-week parallel two-arm pilot RCT in Tasmania, Australia. KOA participants were randomized to either a walking plus usual care group or a usual care control group. The walking group trained 3 days/week. The primary outcome was feasibility assessed by changes being required to the study design, recruitment, randomization, program adherence, safety, and retention. Exploratory outcomes were changes in symptoms, physical performance/activity, and MRI measures. RESULTS: Forty participants (mean age 66 years (SD 1.4) and 60% female) were randomized to walking (n = 24) or usual care (n = 16). Simple randomization resulted in a difference in numbers randomized to the two groups. During the study, class sizes were reduced from 10 to 8 participants to improve supervision, and exclusion criteria were added to facilitate program adherence. In the walking group, total program adherence was 70.0% and retention 70.8% at 24 weeks. The walking group had a higher number of mild adverse events and experienced clinically important improvements in symptoms (e.g., visual analogue scale (VAS) knee pain change in the walking group: − 38.7 mm [95% CI − 47.1 to − 30.3] versus usual care group: 4.3 mm [− 4.9 to 13.4]). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the feasibility of a full-scale RCT given acceptable adherence, retention, randomization, and safety, and recruitment challenges have been identified. Large symptomatic benefits support the clinical usefulness of a subsequent trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12618001097235. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-022-06477-5.