Cargando…
Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study
OBJECTIVES: This follow-up study aimed at collecting long-term data for removable partial dentures (RPDs) retained by double crowns with spark-eroded friction pins (DCP) and comparing them in the presence of severely reduced dentition (SRD) and non-SRD (NSRD, i.e. residual dentition with more than t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04788-0 |
_version_ | 1785025638986416128 |
---|---|
author | Hinz, Sebastian Bömicke, Wolfgang Schweyen, Ramona Bensel, Tobias |
author_facet | Hinz, Sebastian Bömicke, Wolfgang Schweyen, Ramona Bensel, Tobias |
author_sort | Hinz, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This follow-up study aimed at collecting long-term data for removable partial dentures (RPDs) retained by double crowns with spark-eroded friction pins (DCP) and comparing them in the presence of severely reduced dentition (SRD) and non-SRD (NSRD, i.e. residual dentition with more than three abutment teeth) after a 10-year wearing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 participants (n = 71, 44.9% women) aged 62.5 ± 12.7 years with 182 prostheses on 520 abutment teeth were followed up between 2006 and 2022. The SRD group included 144 RPDs supported by 314 abutment teeth. The data collection was performed retrospectively. 10-year survival rates of RPDs and abutment teeth were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test for SRD and NSRD, among others. Cox regression analyses were conducted to isolate risk factors for the survival of both RPDs and abutment teeth. RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative survival rate of all abutment teeth was 65.6% with significantly lower values in the SRD group (53.5%) (p < 0.001). The survival rate for all RPDs was 65.5%. The SRD group showed lower survival rates (57.9%) (p = 0.004). The number and location of the abutment teeth had a significant influence on the survival rates of the RPDs and the abutment teeth. Age, sex, jaw, relining, and vitality had a significant influence on the abutment teeth survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: RPDs showed an acceptable clinical survival rate after 10 years. The number, location, and vitality of abutment teeth were factors that influenced the survival of both RPDs and abutment teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Consideration of the influencing factors found can help improve the prognostic assessment of double crown-retained dentures in the context of prosthetic therapy planning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10102142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101021422023-04-15 Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study Hinz, Sebastian Bömicke, Wolfgang Schweyen, Ramona Bensel, Tobias Clin Oral Investig Research OBJECTIVES: This follow-up study aimed at collecting long-term data for removable partial dentures (RPDs) retained by double crowns with spark-eroded friction pins (DCP) and comparing them in the presence of severely reduced dentition (SRD) and non-SRD (NSRD, i.e. residual dentition with more than three abutment teeth) after a 10-year wearing period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 participants (n = 71, 44.9% women) aged 62.5 ± 12.7 years with 182 prostheses on 520 abutment teeth were followed up between 2006 and 2022. The SRD group included 144 RPDs supported by 314 abutment teeth. The data collection was performed retrospectively. 10-year survival rates of RPDs and abutment teeth were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test for SRD and NSRD, among others. Cox regression analyses were conducted to isolate risk factors for the survival of both RPDs and abutment teeth. RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative survival rate of all abutment teeth was 65.6% with significantly lower values in the SRD group (53.5%) (p < 0.001). The survival rate for all RPDs was 65.5%. The SRD group showed lower survival rates (57.9%) (p = 0.004). The number and location of the abutment teeth had a significant influence on the survival rates of the RPDs and the abutment teeth. Age, sex, jaw, relining, and vitality had a significant influence on the abutment teeth survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: RPDs showed an acceptable clinical survival rate after 10 years. The number, location, and vitality of abutment teeth were factors that influenced the survival of both RPDs and abutment teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Consideration of the influencing factors found can help improve the prognostic assessment of double crown-retained dentures in the context of prosthetic therapy planning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-11-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10102142/ /pubmed/36414766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04788-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hinz, Sebastian Bömicke, Wolfgang Schweyen, Ramona Bensel, Tobias Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
title | Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
title_full | Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
title_short | Ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
title_sort | ten-year clinical performance of non-precious metal double crowns with friction pins in severely reduced dentitions—a retrospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36414766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04788-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hinzsebastian tenyearclinicalperformanceofnonpreciousmetaldoublecrownswithfrictionpinsinseverelyreduceddentitionsaretrospectivestudy AT bomickewolfgang tenyearclinicalperformanceofnonpreciousmetaldoublecrownswithfrictionpinsinseverelyreduceddentitionsaretrospectivestudy AT schweyenramona tenyearclinicalperformanceofnonpreciousmetaldoublecrownswithfrictionpinsinseverelyreduceddentitionsaretrospectivestudy AT benseltobias tenyearclinicalperformanceofnonpreciousmetaldoublecrownswithfrictionpinsinseverelyreduceddentitionsaretrospectivestudy |