Cargando…

Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease

PURPOSE: Immunogenic causes of inflammation may be difficult to differentiate in the work-up of orbital inflammatory disease. The study aims to investigate the utility of autoimmune markers in the screening for orbital inflammation. Markers studied included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), antin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ang, Terence, Juniat, Valerie, Selva, Dinesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35440697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02068-5
_version_ 1785025648601858048
author Ang, Terence
Juniat, Valerie
Selva, Dinesh
author_facet Ang, Terence
Juniat, Valerie
Selva, Dinesh
author_sort Ang, Terence
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Immunogenic causes of inflammation may be difficult to differentiate in the work-up of orbital inflammatory disease. The study aims to investigate the utility of autoimmune markers in the screening for orbital inflammation. Markers studied included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (Anti-CCP) and anti-double stranded DNA antibody (Anti-dsDNA antibody). METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients with non-infective orbital inflammation screened for autoimmune markers at presentation. Serology was interpreted alongside clinical course and other investigations (e.g. radiographic features and histopathology). Tabulated data and Pearson’s Chi-square allowed analysis of trends between serology, diagnosis and the decision to biopsy. RESULTS: 79 patients, between 1999 and 2021, were included (50 females, mean age was 50.4 ± 17.4 years). 28 (34.6%) patients had specific orbital inflammation and 53 (65.4%) patients had non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI). Of the 12 patients with positive serology and a specific diagnosis, only 5 (41.7%) patients had concordant serological results. There was no association between serology results and the patient undergoing biopsy (P = 0.651). Serology was unable to exclude nor differentiate NSOI from other specific conditions and ANA had limited discriminatory value between specific conditions and NSOI. CONCLUSION: Serological testing alone may not provide a clear direction for further investigation of orbital inflammation and a biopsy may occur independently of the serological results. The value of autoimmune markers may lie in subsequent follow-up as patients may develop suggestive symptoms after an indeterminate positive result or initially seronegative disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10102185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101021852023-04-15 Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease Ang, Terence Juniat, Valerie Selva, Dinesh Eye (Lond) Article PURPOSE: Immunogenic causes of inflammation may be difficult to differentiate in the work-up of orbital inflammatory disease. The study aims to investigate the utility of autoimmune markers in the screening for orbital inflammation. Markers studied included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (Anti-CCP) and anti-double stranded DNA antibody (Anti-dsDNA antibody). METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients with non-infective orbital inflammation screened for autoimmune markers at presentation. Serology was interpreted alongside clinical course and other investigations (e.g. radiographic features and histopathology). Tabulated data and Pearson’s Chi-square allowed analysis of trends between serology, diagnosis and the decision to biopsy. RESULTS: 79 patients, between 1999 and 2021, were included (50 females, mean age was 50.4 ± 17.4 years). 28 (34.6%) patients had specific orbital inflammation and 53 (65.4%) patients had non-specific orbital inflammation (NSOI). Of the 12 patients with positive serology and a specific diagnosis, only 5 (41.7%) patients had concordant serological results. There was no association between serology results and the patient undergoing biopsy (P = 0.651). Serology was unable to exclude nor differentiate NSOI from other specific conditions and ANA had limited discriminatory value between specific conditions and NSOI. CONCLUSION: Serological testing alone may not provide a clear direction for further investigation of orbital inflammation and a biopsy may occur independently of the serological results. The value of autoimmune markers may lie in subsequent follow-up as patients may develop suggestive symptoms after an indeterminate positive result or initially seronegative disease. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-04-19 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10102185/ /pubmed/35440697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02068-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Ang, Terence
Juniat, Valerie
Selva, Dinesh
Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
title Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
title_full Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
title_fullStr Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
title_full_unstemmed Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
title_short Autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
title_sort autoimmune markers in screening for orbital inflammatory disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35440697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02068-5
work_keys_str_mv AT angterence autoimmunemarkersinscreeningfororbitalinflammatorydisease
AT juniatvalerie autoimmunemarkersinscreeningfororbitalinflammatorydisease
AT selvadinesh autoimmunemarkersinscreeningfororbitalinflammatorydisease