Gamma Nail Combined with One Cannulated Compression Screw Fixation for Treating Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures in Young and Middle‐Aged Adults: Clinical Follow‐Up and Biomechanical Studies

OBJECTIVE: Recently, some clinical studies have reported the use of an intramedullary nailing system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures or femoral neck fractures combined with femoral shaft fractures in young adults, and the results have indicated certain advantages. However, no study has investigated the mechanical properties of this method. We aimed to evaluate the mechanical stability and clinical efficacy of the Gamma nail combined with one cannulated compression screw (CCS) fixation for treating Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture in young and middle‐aged adults. METHODS: This study consists of two parts: a clinical retrospective study and randomized controlled biomechanical test. Twelve adult cadaver femora were used to test and compare the biomechanical properties among three fixation methods: three parallel CCS (group A), Gamma nail (group B), and Gamma nail combined with one cannulated compression screw (group C). The single continuous compression test, cyclic load test, and ultimate vertical load test were used to evaluate the biomechanical performance of the three fixation methods. We also conducted a retrospective study of 31 patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, including 16 patients with fractures fixed with three parallel CCS (CCS group) and 15 patients with fractures fixed with Gamma nail combined with one CCS (Gamma nail + CCS group). The patients were followed up for at least 3 years, and all were evaluated for surgical time (from skin incision to closure), surgical blood loss, hospital stay, and the Harris hip score. RESULTS: In mechanical experiments, we have found that the mechanical advantages of Gamma nail fixation are not as good as those of conventional CCS fixation. However, the mechanical properties of Gamma nail fixation combined with one cannulated screw perpendicular to the fracture line are much better than those of Gamma nail fixation and CCS fixation. No significant difference was found in the incidence of femoral head necrosis and nonunion between the CCS and Gamma nail + CCS groups. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference in the Harris hip scores between the two groups. One patient in the CCS group showed significant withdrawal of cannulated screws at 5 months after surgery, whereas in the Gamma nail + CCS group, all patients, including those with femoral neck necrosis, showed no loss of stability of the fixation. CONCLUSION: Among the two fixation methods evaluated in this study, Gamma nail combined with one CCS fixation showed better biomechanical properties and may reduce complications associated with unstable fixation devices.