Cargando…
Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
BACKGROUND: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinician...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064364 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-825 |
_version_ | 1785025758599577600 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Peng Yan, Hui Song, Zhiyue Xu, Yingjie Hu, Zhihui Dai, Jianrong |
author_facet | Huang, Peng Yan, Hui Song, Zhiyue Xu, Yingjie Hu, Zhihui Dai, Jianrong |
author_sort | Huang, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinicians. Multiple features of each plan were extracted and selected by the learning algorithms. The training set consisted of feature samples from 400 normal plans and the testing set consisted of feature samples from 158 normal plans and 19 abnormal plans. Using the k-means clustering algorithm in the training stage, 4 normal plan clusters were formed. The distance between the samples in the testing set and the cluster centers were then determined. To evaluate the effect of dimensionality reduction (DR) on detection accuracy, principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE) methods were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 84.2% (16/19) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The specificity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 64.6% (102/158) and 69.0% (109/158), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) based on PCA and AE methods were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The unsupervised learning method was effective for detecting anomalies from the feature samples. Accuracy could be improved with the introduction of AE-based DR technique. The combination of AE and k-means clustering methods provides an automated way to identify abnormal plans among clinical treatment plans in radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10102771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101027712023-04-15 Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans Huang, Peng Yan, Hui Song, Zhiyue Xu, Yingjie Hu, Zhihui Dai, Jianrong Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinicians. Multiple features of each plan were extracted and selected by the learning algorithms. The training set consisted of feature samples from 400 normal plans and the testing set consisted of feature samples from 158 normal plans and 19 abnormal plans. Using the k-means clustering algorithm in the training stage, 4 normal plan clusters were formed. The distance between the samples in the testing set and the cluster centers were then determined. To evaluate the effect of dimensionality reduction (DR) on detection accuracy, principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE) methods were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 84.2% (16/19) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The specificity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 64.6% (102/158) and 69.0% (109/158), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) based on PCA and AE methods were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The unsupervised learning method was effective for detecting anomalies from the feature samples. Accuracy could be improved with the introduction of AE-based DR technique. The combination of AE and k-means clustering methods provides an automated way to identify abnormal plans among clinical treatment plans in radiotherapy. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-24 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10102771/ /pubmed/37064364 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-825 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Huang, Peng Yan, Hui Song, Zhiyue Xu, Yingjie Hu, Zhihui Dai, Jianrong Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
title | Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
title_full | Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
title_fullStr | Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
title_short | Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
title_sort | combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064364 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-825 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangpeng combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans AT yanhui combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans AT songzhiyue combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans AT xuyingjie combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans AT huzhihui combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans AT daijianrong combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans |