Cargando…

Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans

BACKGROUND: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinician...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Peng, Yan, Hui, Song, Zhiyue, Xu, Yingjie, Hu, Zhihui, Dai, Jianrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064364
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-825
_version_ 1785025758599577600
author Huang, Peng
Yan, Hui
Song, Zhiyue
Xu, Yingjie
Hu, Zhihui
Dai, Jianrong
author_facet Huang, Peng
Yan, Hui
Song, Zhiyue
Xu, Yingjie
Hu, Zhihui
Dai, Jianrong
author_sort Huang, Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinicians. Multiple features of each plan were extracted and selected by the learning algorithms. The training set consisted of feature samples from 400 normal plans and the testing set consisted of feature samples from 158 normal plans and 19 abnormal plans. Using the k-means clustering algorithm in the training stage, 4 normal plan clusters were formed. The distance between the samples in the testing set and the cluster centers were then determined. To evaluate the effect of dimensionality reduction (DR) on detection accuracy, principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE) methods were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 84.2% (16/19) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The specificity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 64.6% (102/158) and 69.0% (109/158), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) based on PCA and AE methods were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The unsupervised learning method was effective for detecting anomalies from the feature samples. Accuracy could be improved with the introduction of AE-based DR technique. The combination of AE and k-means clustering methods provides an automated way to identify abnormal plans among clinical treatment plans in radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10102771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101027712023-04-15 Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans Huang, Peng Yan, Hui Song, Zhiyue Xu, Yingjie Hu, Zhihui Dai, Jianrong Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: To develop an unsupervised anomaly detection method to identify suspicious error-prone treatment plans in radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 577 treatment plans of breast cancer patients were used in this study. They were labeled as either normal or abnormal plans by experienced clinicians. Multiple features of each plan were extracted and selected by the learning algorithms. The training set consisted of feature samples from 400 normal plans and the testing set consisted of feature samples from 158 normal plans and 19 abnormal plans. Using the k-means clustering algorithm in the training stage, 4 normal plan clusters were formed. The distance between the samples in the testing set and the cluster centers were then determined. To evaluate the effect of dimensionality reduction (DR) on detection accuracy, principal component analysis (PCA) and autoencoder (AE) methods were compared. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 84.2% (16/19) and 94.7% (18/19), respectively. The specificity of the anomaly detection model based on PCA and AE methods were 64.6% (102/158) and 69.0% (109/158), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUCs) based on PCA and AE methods were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The unsupervised learning method was effective for detecting anomalies from the feature samples. Accuracy could be improved with the introduction of AE-based DR technique. The combination of AE and k-means clustering methods provides an automated way to identify abnormal plans among clinical treatment plans in radiotherapy. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-24 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10102771/ /pubmed/37064364 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-825 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Huang, Peng
Yan, Hui
Song, Zhiyue
Xu, Yingjie
Hu, Zhihui
Dai, Jianrong
Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
title Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
title_full Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
title_fullStr Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
title_full_unstemmed Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
title_short Combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
title_sort combining autoencoder with clustering analysis for anomaly detection in radiotherapy plans
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064364
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-825
work_keys_str_mv AT huangpeng combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans
AT yanhui combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans
AT songzhiyue combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans
AT xuyingjie combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans
AT huzhihui combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans
AT daijianrong combiningautoencoderwithclusteringanalysisforanomalydetectioninradiotherapyplans