Cargando…
A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom
BACKGROUND: For bone health assessment, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is recommended to measure bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in the lumbar spine. However, intermachine differences were not taken into account when developing these recommendations. According to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064359 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-619 |
_version_ | 1785025765036785664 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Yaojun Wu, Yan Zhang, Yonggao Yang, Xiaopeng Gao, Jianbo |
author_facet | Jiang, Yaojun Wu, Yan Zhang, Yonggao Yang, Xiaopeng Gao, Jianbo |
author_sort | Jiang, Yaojun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For bone health assessment, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is recommended to measure bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in the lumbar spine. However, intermachine differences were not taken into account when developing these recommendations. According to the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), phantom-based cross-calibration is adequate after replacing the DEXA system from a different manufacturer. For different DEXA equipment, individual calibration equations were found to be necessary to fit the observed values with the given densities. METHODS: The BMD European Spine Phantom (ESP) measurements (L1, L2, and L3) were assessed on 3 machines. We used the Welch test in the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Tamhane T2 test, linear regressions, and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the consistency of measurements and establish cross-calibration equations. RESULTS: The coefficients of variation (CV)% of the phantom BMD values measured using the 3 systems were less than 3.0%. The 3 DEXA systems were highly correlated with BMD in the lumbar spine, with correlation values ranging from 0.933 to 0.984 (P<0.0001). The cross-calibration regression models of the ESP measurements yielded the highest prediction accuracies with the lowest prediction errors (the standard error of the estimate ranged from 0.004 to 0.008 g/cm(2); P<0.0001). After the regression equations were applied, the differences in BMD values among the 3 systems were negligible. In addition, the Bland-Altman plot showed that almost all data points were within the 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: A strong agreement for BMD measurement was established between the 3 DEXA systems. Cross-calibration equations for the lumbar spine BMD values need to be applied to transform the Hologic Discovery A or GE Lunar iDXA measurements into SONIALVISION SMIT measurements to comply with the ISCD standards for patient continuity of care in assessment during clinical diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10102797 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101027972023-04-15 A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom Jiang, Yaojun Wu, Yan Zhang, Yonggao Yang, Xiaopeng Gao, Jianbo Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: For bone health assessment, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is recommended to measure bone mineral content and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in the lumbar spine. However, intermachine differences were not taken into account when developing these recommendations. According to the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD), phantom-based cross-calibration is adequate after replacing the DEXA system from a different manufacturer. For different DEXA equipment, individual calibration equations were found to be necessary to fit the observed values with the given densities. METHODS: The BMD European Spine Phantom (ESP) measurements (L1, L2, and L3) were assessed on 3 machines. We used the Welch test in the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Tamhane T2 test, linear regressions, and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the consistency of measurements and establish cross-calibration equations. RESULTS: The coefficients of variation (CV)% of the phantom BMD values measured using the 3 systems were less than 3.0%. The 3 DEXA systems were highly correlated with BMD in the lumbar spine, with correlation values ranging from 0.933 to 0.984 (P<0.0001). The cross-calibration regression models of the ESP measurements yielded the highest prediction accuracies with the lowest prediction errors (the standard error of the estimate ranged from 0.004 to 0.008 g/cm(2); P<0.0001). After the regression equations were applied, the differences in BMD values among the 3 systems were negligible. In addition, the Bland-Altman plot showed that almost all data points were within the 95% limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: A strong agreement for BMD measurement was established between the 3 DEXA systems. Cross-calibration equations for the lumbar spine BMD values need to be applied to transform the Hologic Discovery A or GE Lunar iDXA measurements into SONIALVISION SMIT measurements to comply with the ISCD standards for patient continuity of care in assessment during clinical diagnosis. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-06 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10102797/ /pubmed/37064359 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-619 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jiang, Yaojun Wu, Yan Zhang, Yonggao Yang, Xiaopeng Gao, Jianbo A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom |
title | A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom |
title_full | A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom |
title_fullStr | A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom |
title_short | A cross-calibration study using a novel dual X-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the European Spine Phantom |
title_sort | cross-calibration study using a novel dual x-ray absorptiometry system for bone mineral density measurements with the european spine phantom |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10102797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37064359 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-619 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangyaojun acrosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT wuyan acrosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT zhangyonggao acrosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT yangxiaopeng acrosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT gaojianbo acrosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT jiangyaojun crosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT wuyan crosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT zhangyonggao crosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT yangxiaopeng crosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom AT gaojianbo crosscalibrationstudyusinganoveldualxrayabsorptiometrysystemforbonemineraldensitymeasurementswiththeeuropeanspinephantom |