Cargando…

Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of protein-restricted (PR) and energy restriction (ER) on male repro-ductive function. Eighteen weaning Wistar rats were divided into three groups, and were fed an experimental diet for five months. The first group, a control (C), received a diet containing 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benabbou, Meddah, Allaoui, Amine, Zahzeh, Aït Kaci Meriem, Boualga, Ahmed, Zahzeh, Touria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10103604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37066033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.1.61
_version_ 1785025888108150784
author Benabbou, Meddah
Allaoui, Amine
Zahzeh, Aït Kaci Meriem
Boualga, Ahmed
Zahzeh, Touria
author_facet Benabbou, Meddah
Allaoui, Amine
Zahzeh, Aït Kaci Meriem
Boualga, Ahmed
Zahzeh, Touria
author_sort Benabbou, Meddah
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the effects of protein-restricted (PR) and energy restriction (ER) on male repro-ductive function. Eighteen weaning Wistar rats were divided into three groups, and were fed an experimental diet for five months. The first group, a control (C), received a diet containing 20% casein and 1.7×10(6) J/kg diet. The ER was given 50% less calories vs. C, while the PR group was given a low-protein diet (10% casein). The reproductive function was evaluated on serum and testis using anthropometrical, histological, hormonal, and oxidative parameters. The body weight was reduced by 37% and 40%, respectively, in the PR and ER groups vs. C. In the PR group, the testis relative weight was decreased, whereas that of the seminal vesicles was higher than that of C. The epididymis and prostate relative weights remained unchanged in the three experimental groups. Furthermore, serum testosterone concentrations were respectively 1.4- and 2.8-fold lower in the PR and ER groups vs. C, whereas no significant difference was found in luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels among the groups. Compared with the C group, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, carbonyl levels, glutathione, and glutathione reductase activity reduced significantly in PR, and specifically in ER rat’s testis, whereas, catalase and superoxide dismutase activities increased. Furthermore, the testis and epididymis examination revealed histological alterations in the PR and ER groups. In conclusion, ER and PR diets could reduce the oxidant markers, even though they may alter the reproductive activity by probably altering testosterone production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10103604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101036042023-04-15 Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry Benabbou, Meddah Allaoui, Amine Zahzeh, Aït Kaci Meriem Boualga, Ahmed Zahzeh, Touria Prev Nutr Food Sci Original This study aimed to evaluate the effects of protein-restricted (PR) and energy restriction (ER) on male repro-ductive function. Eighteen weaning Wistar rats were divided into three groups, and were fed an experimental diet for five months. The first group, a control (C), received a diet containing 20% casein and 1.7×10(6) J/kg diet. The ER was given 50% less calories vs. C, while the PR group was given a low-protein diet (10% casein). The reproductive function was evaluated on serum and testis using anthropometrical, histological, hormonal, and oxidative parameters. The body weight was reduced by 37% and 40%, respectively, in the PR and ER groups vs. C. In the PR group, the testis relative weight was decreased, whereas that of the seminal vesicles was higher than that of C. The epididymis and prostate relative weights remained unchanged in the three experimental groups. Furthermore, serum testosterone concentrations were respectively 1.4- and 2.8-fold lower in the PR and ER groups vs. C, whereas no significant difference was found in luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels among the groups. Compared with the C group, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, carbonyl levels, glutathione, and glutathione reductase activity reduced significantly in PR, and specifically in ER rat’s testis, whereas, catalase and superoxide dismutase activities increased. Furthermore, the testis and epididymis examination revealed histological alterations in the PR and ER groups. In conclusion, ER and PR diets could reduce the oxidant markers, even though they may alter the reproductive activity by probably altering testosterone production. The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2023-03-31 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10103604/ /pubmed/37066033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.1.61 Text en Copyright © 2023 by The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original
Benabbou, Meddah
Allaoui, Amine
Zahzeh, Aït Kaci Meriem
Boualga, Ahmed
Zahzeh, Touria
Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry
title Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry
title_full Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry
title_fullStr Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry
title_full_unstemmed Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry
title_short Protein vs. Energy Restriction Impact on Rat Testis’ Function, Redox Status, and Histomorphometry
title_sort protein vs. energy restriction impact on rat testis’ function, redox status, and histomorphometry
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10103604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37066033
http://dx.doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2023.28.1.61
work_keys_str_mv AT benabboumeddah proteinvsenergyrestrictionimpactonrattestisfunctionredoxstatusandhistomorphometry
AT allaouiamine proteinvsenergyrestrictionimpactonrattestisfunctionredoxstatusandhistomorphometry
AT zahzehaitkacimeriem proteinvsenergyrestrictionimpactonrattestisfunctionredoxstatusandhistomorphometry
AT boualgaahmed proteinvsenergyrestrictionimpactonrattestisfunctionredoxstatusandhistomorphometry
AT zahzehtouria proteinvsenergyrestrictionimpactonrattestisfunctionredoxstatusandhistomorphometry