Cargando…
Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review
BACKGROUND: Governments have relied on their citizens to adhere to a variety of transmission-reducing behaviours (TRBs) to suppress the Covid-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological and sociodemographic predictors of adherence to TRBs will be heavily influenced by the particular theories used b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37059924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10171-4 |
_version_ | 1785026091887362048 |
---|---|
author | Hubbard, Gill Daas, Chantal den Johnston, Marie Dunsmore, Jennifer Maier, Mona Polson, Rob Dixon, Diane |
author_facet | Hubbard, Gill Daas, Chantal den Johnston, Marie Dunsmore, Jennifer Maier, Mona Polson, Rob Dixon, Diane |
author_sort | Hubbard, Gill |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Governments have relied on their citizens to adhere to a variety of transmission-reducing behaviours (TRBs) to suppress the Covid-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological and sociodemographic predictors of adherence to TRBs will be heavily influenced by the particular theories used by researchers. This review aims to identify the theories and theoretical constructs used to understand adherence to TRBs during the pandemic within the UK social and legislative context. METHODS: A systematic review identified studies to understand TRBs of adults in the UK during the pandemic. Identified theoretical constructs were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Data are presented as a narrative summary. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies (n = 211,209) investigated 123 TRBs, applied 13 theoretical frameworks and reported 50 sociodemographic characteristics and 129 psychological constructs. Most studies used social cognition theories to understand TRBs and employed cross-sectional designs. Risk of sampling bias was high. Relationships between constructs and TRBs varied, but in general, beliefs about the disease (e.g. severity and risk perception) and about TRBs (e.g. behavioural norms) influenced behavioural intentions and self-reported adherence. More studies than not found that older people and females were more adherent. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural scientists in the UK generated a significant and varied body of work to understand TRBs during the pandemic. However, more use of theories that do not rely on deliberative processes to effect behaviour change and study designs better able to support causal inferences should be used in future to inform public health policy and practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021282699. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-023-10171-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10104693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101046932023-04-17 Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review Hubbard, Gill Daas, Chantal den Johnston, Marie Dunsmore, Jennifer Maier, Mona Polson, Rob Dixon, Diane Int J Behav Med Integrative Review BACKGROUND: Governments have relied on their citizens to adhere to a variety of transmission-reducing behaviours (TRBs) to suppress the Covid-19 pandemic. Understanding the psychological and sociodemographic predictors of adherence to TRBs will be heavily influenced by the particular theories used by researchers. This review aims to identify the theories and theoretical constructs used to understand adherence to TRBs during the pandemic within the UK social and legislative context. METHODS: A systematic review identified studies to understand TRBs of adults in the UK during the pandemic. Identified theoretical constructs were coded to the Theoretical Domains Framework. Data are presented as a narrative summary. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies (n = 211,209) investigated 123 TRBs, applied 13 theoretical frameworks and reported 50 sociodemographic characteristics and 129 psychological constructs. Most studies used social cognition theories to understand TRBs and employed cross-sectional designs. Risk of sampling bias was high. Relationships between constructs and TRBs varied, but in general, beliefs about the disease (e.g. severity and risk perception) and about TRBs (e.g. behavioural norms) influenced behavioural intentions and self-reported adherence. More studies than not found that older people and females were more adherent. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural scientists in the UK generated a significant and varied body of work to understand TRBs during the pandemic. However, more use of theories that do not rely on deliberative processes to effect behaviour change and study designs better able to support causal inferences should be used in future to inform public health policy and practice. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021282699. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12529-023-10171-4. Springer US 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10104693/ /pubmed/37059924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10171-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Integrative Review Hubbard, Gill Daas, Chantal den Johnston, Marie Dunsmore, Jennifer Maier, Mona Polson, Rob Dixon, Diane Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review |
title | Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full | Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short | Behavioural Sciences Contribution to Suppressing Transmission of Covid-19 in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort | behavioural sciences contribution to suppressing transmission of covid-19 in the uk: a systematic literature review |
topic | Integrative Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10104693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37059924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12529-023-10171-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hubbardgill behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview AT daaschantalden behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview AT johnstonmarie behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview AT dunsmorejennifer behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview AT maiermona behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview AT polsonrob behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview AT dixondiane behaviouralsciencescontributiontosuppressingtransmissionofcovid19intheukasystematicliteraturereview |