Cargando…

Phantom Boarder Relates to Experimentally‐Induced Presence Hallucinations in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND: Phantom boarder (PB) is the sensation that someone uninvited is in the patient's home despite evidence to the contrary. It is mostly reported by patients with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson's disease (PD). Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanke, Olaf, Bernasconi, Fosco, Potheegadoo, Jevita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13684
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Phantom boarder (PB) is the sensation that someone uninvited is in the patient's home despite evidence to the contrary. It is mostly reported by patients with neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies or Parkinson's disease (PD). Presence hallucination (PH) is frequent in neurodegenerative disease, shares several aspects with PB, and is the sensation that someone is nearby, behind or next to the patient (when nobody is actually there). Recent work developed a sensorimotor method to robotically induce PH (robot‐induced PH, riPH) and demonstrated that a subgroup of PD patients showed abnormal sensitivity for riPH. OBJECTIVE: We investigated if PD patients with PB (PD‐PB) would (1) show elevated sensitivity for riPH that (2) is comparable to that of patients reporting PH, but not PB (PD‐PH). METHODS: We studied the sensitivity of non‐demented PD patients in a sensorimotor stimulation paradigm, during which three groups of patients (PD‐PB; PD‐PH; PD patients without hallucinations, PD‐nPH) were exposed to different conditions of conflicting sensorimotor stimulation. RESULTS: We show that PD‐PB and PD‐PH groups had a higher sensitivity to riPH (compared to PD‐nPH). PD‐PB and PD‐PH groups did not differ in riPH sensitivity. Together with interview data, these behavioral data on riPH show that PB is associated with PH, suggesting that both share some underlying brain mechanisms, although interview data also revealed phenomenological differences. CONCLUSIONS: Because PD‐PB patients did not suffer from dementia nor delusions, we argue that these shared mechanisms are of perceptual‐hallucinatory nature, involving sensorimotor signals and their integration.