Cargando…

Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe

Background: Creating new therapies often involves drug companies paying healthcare professionals and institutions for research and development (R&D) activities, including clinical trials. However, industry sponsorship can create conflicts of interest (COIs). We analysed approaches to drug compan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozieranski, Piotr, Martinon, Luc, Jachiet, Pierre-Alain, Mulinari, Shai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297231
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6575
_version_ 1785026163107692544
author Ozieranski, Piotr
Martinon, Luc
Jachiet, Pierre-Alain
Mulinari, Shai
author_facet Ozieranski, Piotr
Martinon, Luc
Jachiet, Pierre-Alain
Mulinari, Shai
author_sort Ozieranski, Piotr
collection PubMed
description Background: Creating new therapies often involves drug companies paying healthcare professionals and institutions for research and development (R&D) activities, including clinical trials. However, industry sponsorship can create conflicts of interest (COIs). We analysed approaches to drug company R&D payment disclosure in European countries and the distribution of R&D payments at the country and company level. Methods: Using documentary sources and a stakeholder survey we identified country- regulatory approaches to R&D payment disclosure. We reviewed company-level descriptions of disclosure practices in the United Kingdom, a country with a major role in Europe’s R&D. We obtained country-level R&D payment data from industry trade groups and public authorities and company-level data from eurosfordocs.eu, a publicly available payments database. We conducted content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis. Results: In 32 of 37 studied countries, all R&D payments were reported without named recipients, following a self-regulatory approach developed by the industry. The methodological descriptions from 125 companies operating in the United Kingdom suggest that within the self-regulatory approach companies had much leeway in deciding what activities and payments were considered as R&D. In five countries, legislation mandated the disclosure of R&D payment recipients, but only in two were payments practically identifiable and analysable. In 17 countries with available data, R&D constituted 19%-82% of all payments reported, with self-regulation associated with higher shares. Available company-level data from three countries with self-regulation suggests that R&D payments were concentrated by big funders, and some companies reported all, or nearly all, payments as R&D. Conclusion: The lack of full disclosure of R&D payments in countries with industry self-regulation leaves considerable sums of money unaccounted for and potentially many COIs undetected. Disclosure mandated by legislation exists in few countries and rarely enhances transparency practically. We recommend a unified European approach to R&D payment disclosure, including clear definitions and a centralised database.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101051702023-04-16 Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe Ozieranski, Piotr Martinon, Luc Jachiet, Pierre-Alain Mulinari, Shai Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Creating new therapies often involves drug companies paying healthcare professionals and institutions for research and development (R&D) activities, including clinical trials. However, industry sponsorship can create conflicts of interest (COIs). We analysed approaches to drug company R&D payment disclosure in European countries and the distribution of R&D payments at the country and company level. Methods: Using documentary sources and a stakeholder survey we identified country- regulatory approaches to R&D payment disclosure. We reviewed company-level descriptions of disclosure practices in the United Kingdom, a country with a major role in Europe’s R&D. We obtained country-level R&D payment data from industry trade groups and public authorities and company-level data from eurosfordocs.eu, a publicly available payments database. We conducted content analysis and descriptive statistical analysis. Results: In 32 of 37 studied countries, all R&D payments were reported without named recipients, following a self-regulatory approach developed by the industry. The methodological descriptions from 125 companies operating in the United Kingdom suggest that within the self-regulatory approach companies had much leeway in deciding what activities and payments were considered as R&D. In five countries, legislation mandated the disclosure of R&D payment recipients, but only in two were payments practically identifiable and analysable. In 17 countries with available data, R&D constituted 19%-82% of all payments reported, with self-regulation associated with higher shares. Available company-level data from three countries with self-regulation suggests that R&D payments were concentrated by big funders, and some companies reported all, or nearly all, payments as R&D. Conclusion: The lack of full disclosure of R&D payments in countries with industry self-regulation leaves considerable sums of money unaccounted for and potentially many COIs undetected. Disclosure mandated by legislation exists in few countries and rarely enhances transparency practically. We recommend a unified European approach to R&D payment disclosure, including clear definitions and a centralised database. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10105170/ /pubmed/35297231 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6575 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ozieranski, Piotr
Martinon, Luc
Jachiet, Pierre-Alain
Mulinari, Shai
Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe
title Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe
title_full Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe
title_fullStr Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe
title_short Tip of the Iceberg? Country- and Company-Level Analysis of Drug Company Payments for Research and Development in Europe
title_sort tip of the iceberg? country- and company-level analysis of drug company payments for research and development in europe
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35297231
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6575
work_keys_str_mv AT ozieranskipiotr tipoftheicebergcountryandcompanylevelanalysisofdrugcompanypaymentsforresearchanddevelopmentineurope
AT martinonluc tipoftheicebergcountryandcompanylevelanalysisofdrugcompanypaymentsforresearchanddevelopmentineurope
AT jachietpierrealain tipoftheicebergcountryandcompanylevelanalysisofdrugcompanypaymentsforresearchanddevelopmentineurope
AT mulinarishai tipoftheicebergcountryandcompanylevelanalysisofdrugcompanypaymentsforresearchanddevelopmentineurope