Cargando…

Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review

Background: A ‘Health in All Policies’ (HiAP) approach has been widely advocated as a way to involve multiple government sectors in addressing health inequalities, but implementation attempts have not always produced the expected results. Explaining how HiAP-style collaborations have been governed m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Such, Elizabeth, Smith, Katherine, Woods, Helen Buckley, Meier, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35219286
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6550
_version_ 1785026167270539264
author Such, Elizabeth
Smith, Katherine
Woods, Helen Buckley
Meier, Petra
author_facet Such, Elizabeth
Smith, Katherine
Woods, Helen Buckley
Meier, Petra
author_sort Such, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Background: A ‘Health in All Policies’ (HiAP) approach has been widely advocated as a way to involve multiple government sectors in addressing health inequalities, but implementation attempts have not always produced the expected results. Explaining how HiAP-style collaborations have been governed may offer insights into how to improve population health and reduce health inequalities. Methods: Theoretically focused systematic review. Synthesis of evidence from evaluative studies into a causal logic model. Results: Thirty-one publications based on 40 case studies from nine high-income countries were included. Intersectoral collaborations for population health and equity were multi-component and multi-dimensional with collaborative activity spanning policy, strategy, service design and service delivery. Governance of intersectoral collaboration included structural and relational components. Both internal and external legitimacy and credibility delivered collaborative power, which in turn enabled intersectoral collaboration. Internal legitimacy was driven by multiple structural elements and processes. Many of these were instrumental in developing (often-fragile) relational trust. Internal credibility was supported by multi-level collaborations that were adequately resourced and shared power. External legitimacy and credibility was created through meaningful community engagement, leadership that championed collaborations and the identification of ‘win-win’ strategies. External factors such as economic shocks and short political cycles reduced collaborative power. Conclusion: This novel review, using systems thinking and causal loop representations, offers insights into how collaborations can generate internal and external legitimacy and credibility. This offers promise for future collaborative activity for population health and equity; it presents a clearer picture of what structural and relational components and dynamics collaborative partners can focus on when planning and implementing HiAP initiatives. The limits of the literature base, however, does not make it possible to identify if or how this might deliver improved population health or health equity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101051872023-04-16 Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review Such, Elizabeth Smith, Katherine Woods, Helen Buckley Meier, Petra Int J Health Policy Manag Meta-Synthesis Background: A ‘Health in All Policies’ (HiAP) approach has been widely advocated as a way to involve multiple government sectors in addressing health inequalities, but implementation attempts have not always produced the expected results. Explaining how HiAP-style collaborations have been governed may offer insights into how to improve population health and reduce health inequalities. Methods: Theoretically focused systematic review. Synthesis of evidence from evaluative studies into a causal logic model. Results: Thirty-one publications based on 40 case studies from nine high-income countries were included. Intersectoral collaborations for population health and equity were multi-component and multi-dimensional with collaborative activity spanning policy, strategy, service design and service delivery. Governance of intersectoral collaboration included structural and relational components. Both internal and external legitimacy and credibility delivered collaborative power, which in turn enabled intersectoral collaboration. Internal legitimacy was driven by multiple structural elements and processes. Many of these were instrumental in developing (often-fragile) relational trust. Internal credibility was supported by multi-level collaborations that were adequately resourced and shared power. External legitimacy and credibility was created through meaningful community engagement, leadership that championed collaborations and the identification of ‘win-win’ strategies. External factors such as economic shocks and short political cycles reduced collaborative power. Conclusion: This novel review, using systems thinking and causal loop representations, offers insights into how collaborations can generate internal and external legitimacy and credibility. This offers promise for future collaborative activity for population health and equity; it presents a clearer picture of what structural and relational components and dynamics collaborative partners can focus on when planning and implementing HiAP initiatives. The limits of the literature base, however, does not make it possible to identify if or how this might deliver improved population health or health equity. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10105187/ /pubmed/35219286 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6550 Text en © 2022 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Meta-Synthesis
Such, Elizabeth
Smith, Katherine
Woods, Helen Buckley
Meier, Petra
Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review
title Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review
title_full Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review
title_fullStr Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review
title_short Governance of Intersectoral Collaborations for Population Health and to Reduce Health Inequalities in High-Income Countries: A Complexity-Informed Systematic Review
title_sort governance of intersectoral collaborations for population health and to reduce health inequalities in high-income countries: a complexity-informed systematic review
topic Meta-Synthesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35219286
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6550
work_keys_str_mv AT suchelizabeth governanceofintersectoralcollaborationsforpopulationhealthandtoreducehealthinequalitiesinhighincomecountriesacomplexityinformedsystematicreview
AT smithkatherine governanceofintersectoralcollaborationsforpopulationhealthandtoreducehealthinequalitiesinhighincomecountriesacomplexityinformedsystematicreview
AT woodshelenbuckley governanceofintersectoralcollaborationsforpopulationhealthandtoreducehealthinequalitiesinhighincomecountriesacomplexityinformedsystematicreview
AT meierpetra governanceofintersectoralcollaborationsforpopulationhealthandtoreducehealthinequalitiesinhighincomecountriesacomplexityinformedsystematicreview