Cargando…
Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting
BACKGROUND: External randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is feasible. Prespecified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive RCT should be conducted. This comment...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01291-5 |
_version_ | 1785026203384545280 |
---|---|
author | Mellor, Katie Albury, Charlotte Dutton, Susan J Eldridge, Sandra Hopewell, Sally |
author_facet | Mellor, Katie Albury, Charlotte Dutton, Susan J Eldridge, Sandra Hopewell, Sally |
author_sort | Mellor, Katie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: External randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is feasible. Prespecified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive RCT should be conducted. This commentary presents a set of proposed recommendations for progression criteria to guide researchers when (i) designing, (ii) conducting, (iii) analysing and (iv) reporting external randomised pilot trials. METHODS: Recommendations were developed following a mixed methods approach. This involved (i) a methodological review of pilot trial publications, (ii) a cross-sectional study of pilot trial research funding applications, (iii) qualitative interviews with pilot trial researchers and (iv) a survey of corresponding authors of identified pilot trial publications. Initial recommendations were refined following two consultation stakeholder workshops held in July 2022. Recommendations for progression criteria for external randomised pilot trials: i. Design: consider progression criteria from the earliest opportunity; map progression criteria to feasibility objectives; consider quantitative and qualitative interpretations of feasibility; provide justification; develop guidelines rather than rules; seek input from relevant stakeholders. ii. Conduct: regularly monitor pilot trial data against progression criteria. iii. Analysis: avoid considering each progression criterion in isolation; engage in discussion with relevant stakeholders; consider context and other factors external to the pilot trial; consider feasibility (can we?) and progression (will we?). iv. Reporting: we propose a reporting checklist in relation to progression criteria and recommend reporting in a table format for clarity. CONCLUSION: These recommendations provide a helpful resource for researchers to consider progression criteria at different stages of external randomised pilot trials. We have produced a simple infographic tool to summarise these recommendations for researchers to refer to. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these proposed recommendations should inform future development, or update, of established guidelines for the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of external randomised pilot trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10105402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101054022023-04-16 Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting Mellor, Katie Albury, Charlotte Dutton, Susan J Eldridge, Sandra Hopewell, Sally Pilot Feasibility Stud Commentary BACKGROUND: External randomised pilot trials aim to assess whether a future definitive Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) is feasible. Prespecified progression criteria help guide the interpretation of pilot trial findings to decide whether, and how, a definitive RCT should be conducted. This commentary presents a set of proposed recommendations for progression criteria to guide researchers when (i) designing, (ii) conducting, (iii) analysing and (iv) reporting external randomised pilot trials. METHODS: Recommendations were developed following a mixed methods approach. This involved (i) a methodological review of pilot trial publications, (ii) a cross-sectional study of pilot trial research funding applications, (iii) qualitative interviews with pilot trial researchers and (iv) a survey of corresponding authors of identified pilot trial publications. Initial recommendations were refined following two consultation stakeholder workshops held in July 2022. Recommendations for progression criteria for external randomised pilot trials: i. Design: consider progression criteria from the earliest opportunity; map progression criteria to feasibility objectives; consider quantitative and qualitative interpretations of feasibility; provide justification; develop guidelines rather than rules; seek input from relevant stakeholders. ii. Conduct: regularly monitor pilot trial data against progression criteria. iii. Analysis: avoid considering each progression criterion in isolation; engage in discussion with relevant stakeholders; consider context and other factors external to the pilot trial; consider feasibility (can we?) and progression (will we?). iv. Reporting: we propose a reporting checklist in relation to progression criteria and recommend reporting in a table format for clarity. CONCLUSION: These recommendations provide a helpful resource for researchers to consider progression criteria at different stages of external randomised pilot trials. We have produced a simple infographic tool to summarise these recommendations for researchers to refer to. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these proposed recommendations should inform future development, or update, of established guidelines for the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of external randomised pilot trials. BioMed Central 2023-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10105402/ /pubmed/37061720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01291-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Mellor, Katie Albury, Charlotte Dutton, Susan J Eldridge, Sandra Hopewell, Sally Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
title | Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
title_full | Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
title_fullStr | Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
title_short | Recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
title_sort | recommendations for progression criteria during external randomised pilot trial design, conduct, analysis and reporting |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-023-01291-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mellorkatie recommendationsforprogressioncriteriaduringexternalrandomisedpilottrialdesignconductanalysisandreporting AT alburycharlotte recommendationsforprogressioncriteriaduringexternalrandomisedpilottrialdesignconductanalysisandreporting AT duttonsusanj recommendationsforprogressioncriteriaduringexternalrandomisedpilottrialdesignconductanalysisandreporting AT eldridgesandra recommendationsforprogressioncriteriaduringexternalrandomisedpilottrialdesignconductanalysisandreporting AT hopewellsally recommendationsforprogressioncriteriaduringexternalrandomisedpilottrialdesignconductanalysisandreporting |