Cargando…
Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff
For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37060028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4 |
_version_ | 1785026215839531008 |
---|---|
author | Bernaerdt, Elise Díaz, Inmaculada Piñeiro, Carlos Collell, Miquel Dewulf, Jeroen Maes, Dominiek |
author_facet | Bernaerdt, Elise Díaz, Inmaculada Piñeiro, Carlos Collell, Miquel Dewulf, Jeroen Maes, Dominiek |
author_sort | Bernaerdt, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of farm staff on pig farms, to assess risky movements and to investigate whether movements differ according to time (week of the batch farrowing system (BFS) and weekday vs. weekend) and unit (farrowing, gestation/insemination, nursery, and fattening unit). Five commercial sow farms participated and on each farm, an internal movement monitoring system was installed. Detection points were installed throughout the farm and workers had to wear a personal beacon. Movement data were collected from 1 December 2019 until 30 November 2020. The following sequence of movements was considered as safe: (1) dressing room, (2) farrowing, (3) gestation/insemination, (4) nursery, (5) fattening, (6) quarantine, and (7) cadaver storage. Movements in the opposite direction were considered as risk, unless a dressing room was visited in between. The total number of movements differed according to week of the BFS, and was highest in insemination and farrowing week. The percentage of risky movements was influenced by week of the BFS for two farms, and was highest around weaning. The percentage of risky movements varied between farms and ranged from 9 to 38%. There were more movements on a weekday compared to a weekend day. There were more movements towards the farrowing and gestation/insemination unit in insemination and farrowing week compared to other weeks of the BFS, but week of the BFS had no impact on movements towards nursery and fattening unit. This study showed that there were a lot of (risky) movements on pig farms and that these movements varied according to week of the BFS, day of the week, and unit. This study creates awareness, which could be a first step in optimizing working lines. Future research should focus on why certain risky movements occur and how these can be avoided to achieve better biosecurity and higher health status on farms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10105464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101054642023-04-16 Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff Bernaerdt, Elise Díaz, Inmaculada Piñeiro, Carlos Collell, Miquel Dewulf, Jeroen Maes, Dominiek Porcine Health Manag Research For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of farm staff on pig farms, to assess risky movements and to investigate whether movements differ according to time (week of the batch farrowing system (BFS) and weekday vs. weekend) and unit (farrowing, gestation/insemination, nursery, and fattening unit). Five commercial sow farms participated and on each farm, an internal movement monitoring system was installed. Detection points were installed throughout the farm and workers had to wear a personal beacon. Movement data were collected from 1 December 2019 until 30 November 2020. The following sequence of movements was considered as safe: (1) dressing room, (2) farrowing, (3) gestation/insemination, (4) nursery, (5) fattening, (6) quarantine, and (7) cadaver storage. Movements in the opposite direction were considered as risk, unless a dressing room was visited in between. The total number of movements differed according to week of the BFS, and was highest in insemination and farrowing week. The percentage of risky movements was influenced by week of the BFS for two farms, and was highest around weaning. The percentage of risky movements varied between farms and ranged from 9 to 38%. There were more movements on a weekday compared to a weekend day. There were more movements towards the farrowing and gestation/insemination unit in insemination and farrowing week compared to other weeks of the BFS, but week of the BFS had no impact on movements towards nursery and fattening unit. This study showed that there were a lot of (risky) movements on pig farms and that these movements varied according to week of the BFS, day of the week, and unit. This study creates awareness, which could be a first step in optimizing working lines. Future research should focus on why certain risky movements occur and how these can be avoided to achieve better biosecurity and higher health status on farms. BioMed Central 2023-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10105464/ /pubmed/37060028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bernaerdt, Elise Díaz, Inmaculada Piñeiro, Carlos Collell, Miquel Dewulf, Jeroen Maes, Dominiek Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
title | Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
title_full | Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
title_fullStr | Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
title_short | Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
title_sort | optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37060028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernaerdtelise optimizinginternalbiosecurityonpigfarmsbyassessingmovementsoffarmstaff AT diazinmaculada optimizinginternalbiosecurityonpigfarmsbyassessingmovementsoffarmstaff AT pineirocarlos optimizinginternalbiosecurityonpigfarmsbyassessingmovementsoffarmstaff AT collellmiquel optimizinginternalbiosecurityonpigfarmsbyassessingmovementsoffarmstaff AT dewulfjeroen optimizinginternalbiosecurityonpigfarmsbyassessingmovementsoffarmstaff AT maesdominiek optimizinginternalbiosecurityonpigfarmsbyassessingmovementsoffarmstaff |