Cargando…

Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia

RATIONALE: Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age (≥65 years)) risk scores have not been widely evaluated in patients with SARS-CoV-2-positive compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative community-acquired pneu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richter, Tina, Tesch, Falko, Schmitt, Jochen, Koschel, Dirk, Kolditz, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Respiratory Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00168-2023
_version_ 1785026224483991552
author Richter, Tina
Tesch, Falko
Schmitt, Jochen
Koschel, Dirk
Kolditz, Martin
author_facet Richter, Tina
Tesch, Falko
Schmitt, Jochen
Koschel, Dirk
Kolditz, Martin
author_sort Richter, Tina
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age (≥65 years)) risk scores have not been widely evaluated in patients with SARS-CoV-2-positive compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of the present study was to validate the qSOFA(-65) and CRB-65 scores in a large cohort of SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP patients. METHODS: We included all cases with CAP hospitalised in 2020 from the German nationwide mandatory quality assurance programme and compared cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection to cases without. We excluded cases with unclear SARS-CoV-2 infection state, transferred to another hospital or on mechanical ventilation during admission. Predefined outcomes were hospital mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Among 68 594 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, hospital mortality (22.7%) and mechanical ventilation (14.9%) were significantly higher when compared to 167 880 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (15.7% and 9.2%, respectively). All CRB-65 and qSOFA criteria were associated with both outcomes, and age dominated mortality prediction in SARS-CoV-2 (risk ratio >9). Scores including the age criterion had higher area under the curve (AUCs) for mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (e.g. CRB-65 AUC 0.76) compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (AUC 0.68), and negative predictive value was highest for qSOFA-65=0 (98.2%). Sensitivity for mechanical ventilation prediction was poor with all scores (AUCs 0.59–0.62), and negative predictive values were insufficient (qSOFA-65=0 missed 1490 out of 10 198 patients (∼15%) with mechanical ventilation). Results were similar when excluding frail and palliative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation rates were higher in SARS-CoV-2-positive than SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP. For SARS-CoV-2-positive CAP, the CRB-65 and qSOFA-65 scores showed adequate prediction of mortality but not of mechanical ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher European Respiratory Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101055112023-04-16 Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia Richter, Tina Tesch, Falko Schmitt, Jochen Koschel, Dirk Kolditz, Martin ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles RATIONALE: Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age (≥65 years)) risk scores have not been widely evaluated in patients with SARS-CoV-2-positive compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of the present study was to validate the qSOFA(-65) and CRB-65 scores in a large cohort of SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP patients. METHODS: We included all cases with CAP hospitalised in 2020 from the German nationwide mandatory quality assurance programme and compared cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection to cases without. We excluded cases with unclear SARS-CoV-2 infection state, transferred to another hospital or on mechanical ventilation during admission. Predefined outcomes were hospital mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Among 68 594 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, hospital mortality (22.7%) and mechanical ventilation (14.9%) were significantly higher when compared to 167 880 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (15.7% and 9.2%, respectively). All CRB-65 and qSOFA criteria were associated with both outcomes, and age dominated mortality prediction in SARS-CoV-2 (risk ratio >9). Scores including the age criterion had higher area under the curve (AUCs) for mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (e.g. CRB-65 AUC 0.76) compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (AUC 0.68), and negative predictive value was highest for qSOFA-65=0 (98.2%). Sensitivity for mechanical ventilation prediction was poor with all scores (AUCs 0.59–0.62), and negative predictive values were insufficient (qSOFA-65=0 missed 1490 out of 10 198 patients (∼15%) with mechanical ventilation). Results were similar when excluding frail and palliative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation rates were higher in SARS-CoV-2-positive than SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP. For SARS-CoV-2-positive CAP, the CRB-65 and qSOFA-65 scores showed adequate prediction of mortality but not of mechanical ventilation. European Respiratory Society 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10105511/ /pubmed/37337510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00168-2023 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org)
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Richter, Tina
Tesch, Falko
Schmitt, Jochen
Koschel, Dirk
Kolditz, Martin
Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
title Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
title_full Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
title_fullStr Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
title_short Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
title_sort validation of the qsofa and crb-65 in sars-cov-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00168-2023
work_keys_str_mv AT richtertina validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT teschfalko validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT schmittjochen validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT koscheldirk validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT kolditzmartin validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia