Cargando…
Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia
RATIONALE: Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age (≥65 years)) risk scores have not been widely evaluated in patients with SARS-CoV-2-positive compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative community-acquired pneu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00168-2023 |
_version_ | 1785026224483991552 |
---|---|
author | Richter, Tina Tesch, Falko Schmitt, Jochen Koschel, Dirk Kolditz, Martin |
author_facet | Richter, Tina Tesch, Falko Schmitt, Jochen Koschel, Dirk Kolditz, Martin |
author_sort | Richter, Tina |
collection | PubMed |
description | RATIONALE: Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age (≥65 years)) risk scores have not been widely evaluated in patients with SARS-CoV-2-positive compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of the present study was to validate the qSOFA(-65) and CRB-65 scores in a large cohort of SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP patients. METHODS: We included all cases with CAP hospitalised in 2020 from the German nationwide mandatory quality assurance programme and compared cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection to cases without. We excluded cases with unclear SARS-CoV-2 infection state, transferred to another hospital or on mechanical ventilation during admission. Predefined outcomes were hospital mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Among 68 594 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, hospital mortality (22.7%) and mechanical ventilation (14.9%) were significantly higher when compared to 167 880 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (15.7% and 9.2%, respectively). All CRB-65 and qSOFA criteria were associated with both outcomes, and age dominated mortality prediction in SARS-CoV-2 (risk ratio >9). Scores including the age criterion had higher area under the curve (AUCs) for mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (e.g. CRB-65 AUC 0.76) compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (AUC 0.68), and negative predictive value was highest for qSOFA-65=0 (98.2%). Sensitivity for mechanical ventilation prediction was poor with all scores (AUCs 0.59–0.62), and negative predictive values were insufficient (qSOFA-65=0 missed 1490 out of 10 198 patients (∼15%) with mechanical ventilation). Results were similar when excluding frail and palliative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation rates were higher in SARS-CoV-2-positive than SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP. For SARS-CoV-2-positive CAP, the CRB-65 and qSOFA-65 scores showed adequate prediction of mortality but not of mechanical ventilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10105511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101055112023-04-16 Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia Richter, Tina Tesch, Falko Schmitt, Jochen Koschel, Dirk Kolditz, Martin ERJ Open Res Original Research Articles RATIONALE: Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age (≥65 years)) risk scores have not been widely evaluated in patients with SARS-CoV-2-positive compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The aim of the present study was to validate the qSOFA(-65) and CRB-65 scores in a large cohort of SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP patients. METHODS: We included all cases with CAP hospitalised in 2020 from the German nationwide mandatory quality assurance programme and compared cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection to cases without. We excluded cases with unclear SARS-CoV-2 infection state, transferred to another hospital or on mechanical ventilation during admission. Predefined outcomes were hospital mortality and need for mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: Among 68 594 SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, hospital mortality (22.7%) and mechanical ventilation (14.9%) were significantly higher when compared to 167 880 SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (15.7% and 9.2%, respectively). All CRB-65 and qSOFA criteria were associated with both outcomes, and age dominated mortality prediction in SARS-CoV-2 (risk ratio >9). Scores including the age criterion had higher area under the curve (AUCs) for mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (e.g. CRB-65 AUC 0.76) compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients (AUC 0.68), and negative predictive value was highest for qSOFA-65=0 (98.2%). Sensitivity for mechanical ventilation prediction was poor with all scores (AUCs 0.59–0.62), and negative predictive values were insufficient (qSOFA-65=0 missed 1490 out of 10 198 patients (∼15%) with mechanical ventilation). Results were similar when excluding frail and palliative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation rates were higher in SARS-CoV-2-positive than SARS-CoV-2-negative CAP. For SARS-CoV-2-positive CAP, the CRB-65 and qSOFA-65 scores showed adequate prediction of mortality but not of mechanical ventilation. European Respiratory Society 2023-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10105511/ /pubmed/37337510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00168-2023 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Richter, Tina Tesch, Falko Schmitt, Jochen Koschel, Dirk Kolditz, Martin Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
title | Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
title_full | Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
title_fullStr | Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
title_short | Validation of the qSOFA and CRB-65 in SARS-CoV-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
title_sort | validation of the qsofa and crb-65 in sars-cov-2-infected community-acquired pneumonia |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37337510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00168-2023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richtertina validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia AT teschfalko validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia AT schmittjochen validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia AT koscheldirk validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia AT kolditzmartin validationoftheqsofaandcrb65insarscov2infectedcommunityacquiredpneumonia |