Cargando…

The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review

Biologics have been emerging as promising therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who are refractory to conventional medical treatment. This literature review aims to appraise the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of NICE approved biological therapies, of which there are currently f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awan, Humza, Fatima, Urooj, Eaw, Ryan, Knox, Naomi, Alrubaiy, Laith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069838
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37609
_version_ 1785026225978212352
author Awan, Humza
Fatima, Urooj
Eaw, Ryan
Knox, Naomi
Alrubaiy, Laith
author_facet Awan, Humza
Fatima, Urooj
Eaw, Ryan
Knox, Naomi
Alrubaiy, Laith
author_sort Awan, Humza
collection PubMed
description Biologics have been emerging as promising therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who are refractory to conventional medical treatment. This literature review aims to appraise the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of NICE approved biological therapies, of which there are currently five licensed drugs, available for the treatment of UC in adults. An initial search was performed using National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. A further literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Science Direct and Cochrane Library databases was done, resulting in a total of 62 studies being included in this review. Recent and seminal papers were included. Inclusion criteria for this review were adult participants and English papers only. In most studies, anti-tumour necrosis factor ɑ (TNFɑ) naïve patients were found to have improved clinical outcomes. Infliximab was found to be highly effective in inducing short-term clinical response, clinical remission as well as mucosal healing. However, loss of response was common and dose escalation was often required for achievement of long-term efficacy. Adalimumab was found to have both short-term and long-term efficacy which was also supported by real-world data. Golimumab was shown to have comparable efficacy and safety profiles to other biologics, although lack of therapeutic dose monitoring and loss of response is a barrier to optimising golimumab treatment efficacy. Vedolizumab was shown to have higher clinical remission rates when compared to adalimumab in a head-to-head trial, and the most cost-effective biologic when calculating quality-adjusted life years. Ustekinumab was found to significantly improve clinical remission rates in UC patients who were previously unresponsive to other biological treatments. However, as this is a newly licensed drug, there is limited literature currently available. Further, head-to-head studies are required to help determine the optimal treatment for patients with UC. With patents expiring, the development of biosimilars will help to reduce costs and increase the availability of these drugs to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101055192023-04-16 The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review Awan, Humza Fatima, Urooj Eaw, Ryan Knox, Naomi Alrubaiy, Laith Cureus Internal Medicine Biologics have been emerging as promising therapies in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who are refractory to conventional medical treatment. This literature review aims to appraise the existing evidence on the efficacy and safety of NICE approved biological therapies, of which there are currently five licensed drugs, available for the treatment of UC in adults. An initial search was performed using National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines. A further literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Science Direct and Cochrane Library databases was done, resulting in a total of 62 studies being included in this review. Recent and seminal papers were included. Inclusion criteria for this review were adult participants and English papers only. In most studies, anti-tumour necrosis factor ɑ (TNFɑ) naïve patients were found to have improved clinical outcomes. Infliximab was found to be highly effective in inducing short-term clinical response, clinical remission as well as mucosal healing. However, loss of response was common and dose escalation was often required for achievement of long-term efficacy. Adalimumab was found to have both short-term and long-term efficacy which was also supported by real-world data. Golimumab was shown to have comparable efficacy and safety profiles to other biologics, although lack of therapeutic dose monitoring and loss of response is a barrier to optimising golimumab treatment efficacy. Vedolizumab was shown to have higher clinical remission rates when compared to adalimumab in a head-to-head trial, and the most cost-effective biologic when calculating quality-adjusted life years. Ustekinumab was found to significantly improve clinical remission rates in UC patients who were previously unresponsive to other biological treatments. However, as this is a newly licensed drug, there is limited literature currently available. Further, head-to-head studies are required to help determine the optimal treatment for patients with UC. With patents expiring, the development of biosimilars will help to reduce costs and increase the availability of these drugs to patients. Cureus 2023-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10105519/ /pubmed/37069838 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37609 Text en Copyright © 2023, Awan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Awan, Humza
Fatima, Urooj
Eaw, Ryan
Knox, Naomi
Alrubaiy, Laith
The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review
title The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review
title_full The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review
title_short The Efficacy of Currently Licensed Biologics for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Literature Review
title_sort efficacy of currently licensed biologics for treatment of ulcerative colitis: a literature review
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069838
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37609
work_keys_str_mv AT awanhumza theefficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT fatimaurooj theefficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT eawryan theefficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT knoxnaomi theefficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT alrubaiylaith theefficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT awanhumza efficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT fatimaurooj efficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT eawryan efficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT knoxnaomi efficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview
AT alrubaiylaith efficacyofcurrentlylicensedbiologicsfortreatmentofulcerativecolitisaliteraturereview