Cargando…

Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training improves CPR skills while heavily relying on feedback. The quality of feedback can vary between experts, indicating a need for data-driven feedback to support experts. The goal of this study was to investigate pose estimation, a motion detecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss, Kerrin E., Kolbe, Michaela, Nef, Andrina, Grande, Bastian, Kalirajan, Bravin, Meboldt, Mirko, Lohmeyer, Quentin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00251-6
_version_ 1785026252856360960
author Weiss, Kerrin E.
Kolbe, Michaela
Nef, Andrina
Grande, Bastian
Kalirajan, Bravin
Meboldt, Mirko
Lohmeyer, Quentin
author_facet Weiss, Kerrin E.
Kolbe, Michaela
Nef, Andrina
Grande, Bastian
Kalirajan, Bravin
Meboldt, Mirko
Lohmeyer, Quentin
author_sort Weiss, Kerrin E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training improves CPR skills while heavily relying on feedback. The quality of feedback can vary between experts, indicating a need for data-driven feedback to support experts. The goal of this study was to investigate pose estimation, a motion detection technology, to assess individual and team CPR quality with the arm angle and chest-to-chest distance metrics. METHODS: After mandatory basic life support training, 91 healthcare providers performed a simulated CPR scenario in teams. Their behaviour was simultaneously rated based on pose estimation and by experts. It was assessed if the arm was straight at the elbow, by calculating the mean arm angle, and how close the distance between the team members was during chest compressions, by calculating the chest-to-chest distance. Both pose estimation metrics were compared with the expert ratings. RESULTS: The data-driven and expert-based ratings for the arm angle differed by 77.3%, and based on pose estimation, 13.2% of participants kept the arm straight. The chest-to-chest distance ratings by expert and by pose estimation differed by 20.7% and based on pose estimation 63.2% of participants were closer than 1 m to the team member performing compressions. CONCLUSIONS: Pose estimation-based metrics assessed learners’ arm angles in more detail and their chest-to-chest distance comparably to expert ratings. Pose estimation metrics can complement educators with additional objective detail and allow them to focus on other aspects of the simulated CPR training, increasing the training’s success and the participants’ CPR quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101056362023-04-17 Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation Weiss, Kerrin E. Kolbe, Michaela Nef, Andrina Grande, Bastian Kalirajan, Bravin Meboldt, Mirko Lohmeyer, Quentin Adv Simul (Lond) Methodological Intersections BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training improves CPR skills while heavily relying on feedback. The quality of feedback can vary between experts, indicating a need for data-driven feedback to support experts. The goal of this study was to investigate pose estimation, a motion detection technology, to assess individual and team CPR quality with the arm angle and chest-to-chest distance metrics. METHODS: After mandatory basic life support training, 91 healthcare providers performed a simulated CPR scenario in teams. Their behaviour was simultaneously rated based on pose estimation and by experts. It was assessed if the arm was straight at the elbow, by calculating the mean arm angle, and how close the distance between the team members was during chest compressions, by calculating the chest-to-chest distance. Both pose estimation metrics were compared with the expert ratings. RESULTS: The data-driven and expert-based ratings for the arm angle differed by 77.3%, and based on pose estimation, 13.2% of participants kept the arm straight. The chest-to-chest distance ratings by expert and by pose estimation differed by 20.7% and based on pose estimation 63.2% of participants were closer than 1 m to the team member performing compressions. CONCLUSIONS: Pose estimation-based metrics assessed learners’ arm angles in more detail and their chest-to-chest distance comparably to expert ratings. Pose estimation metrics can complement educators with additional objective detail and allow them to focus on other aspects of the simulated CPR training, increasing the training’s success and the participants’ CPR quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. BioMed Central 2023-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10105636/ /pubmed/37061746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00251-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodological Intersections
Weiss, Kerrin E.
Kolbe, Michaela
Nef, Andrina
Grande, Bastian
Kalirajan, Bravin
Meboldt, Mirko
Lohmeyer, Quentin
Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
title Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
title_full Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
title_fullStr Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
title_full_unstemmed Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
title_short Data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
title_sort data-driven resuscitation training using pose estimation
topic Methodological Intersections
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00251-6
work_keys_str_mv AT weisskerrine datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation
AT kolbemichaela datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation
AT nefandrina datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation
AT grandebastian datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation
AT kalirajanbravin datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation
AT meboldtmirko datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation
AT lohmeyerquentin datadrivenresuscitationtrainingusingposeestimation