Cargando…

Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)

PURPOSE: The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) is a recently released guideline designed for the optimal reporting methodology of artificial intelligence (AI) studies. Gliomas are the most common form of primary malignant brain tumour and numerous outcomes derived from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhandari, Abhishta, Scott, Luke, Weilbach, Manuela, Marwah, Ravi, Lasocki, Arian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03126-9
_version_ 1785026256256892928
author Bhandari, Abhishta
Scott, Luke
Weilbach, Manuela
Marwah, Ravi
Lasocki, Arian
author_facet Bhandari, Abhishta
Scott, Luke
Weilbach, Manuela
Marwah, Ravi
Lasocki, Arian
author_sort Bhandari, Abhishta
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) is a recently released guideline designed for the optimal reporting methodology of artificial intelligence (AI) studies. Gliomas are the most common form of primary malignant brain tumour and numerous outcomes derived from AI algorithms such as grading, survival, treatment-related effects and molecular status have been reported. The aim of the study is to evaluate the AI reporting methodology for outcomes relating to gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the CLAIM criteria. METHODS: A literature search was performed on three databases pertaining to AI augmentation of glioma MRI, published between the start of 2018 and the end of 2021 RESULTS: A total of 4308 articles were identified and 138 articles remained after screening. These articles were categorised into four main AI tasks: grading (n= 44), predicting molecular status (n= 50), predicting survival (n= 25) and distinguishing true tumour progression from treatment-related effects (n= 10). The average CLAIM score was 20/42 (range: 10–31). Studies most consistently reported the scientific background and clinical role of their AI approach. Areas of improvement were identified in the reporting of data collection, data management, ground truth and validation of AI performance. CONCLUSION: AI may be a means of producing high-accuracy results for certain tasks in glioma MRI; however, there remain issues with reporting quality. AI reporting guidelines may aid in a more reproducible and standardised approach to reporting and will aid in clinical integration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-023-03126-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101056532023-04-17 Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) Bhandari, Abhishta Scott, Luke Weilbach, Manuela Marwah, Ravi Lasocki, Arian Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology PURPOSE: The Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) is a recently released guideline designed for the optimal reporting methodology of artificial intelligence (AI) studies. Gliomas are the most common form of primary malignant brain tumour and numerous outcomes derived from AI algorithms such as grading, survival, treatment-related effects and molecular status have been reported. The aim of the study is to evaluate the AI reporting methodology for outcomes relating to gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using the CLAIM criteria. METHODS: A literature search was performed on three databases pertaining to AI augmentation of glioma MRI, published between the start of 2018 and the end of 2021 RESULTS: A total of 4308 articles were identified and 138 articles remained after screening. These articles were categorised into four main AI tasks: grading (n= 44), predicting molecular status (n= 50), predicting survival (n= 25) and distinguishing true tumour progression from treatment-related effects (n= 10). The average CLAIM score was 20/42 (range: 10–31). Studies most consistently reported the scientific background and clinical role of their AI approach. Areas of improvement were identified in the reporting of data collection, data management, ground truth and validation of AI performance. CONCLUSION: AI may be a means of producing high-accuracy results for certain tasks in glioma MRI; however, there remain issues with reporting quality. AI reporting guidelines may aid in a more reproducible and standardised approach to reporting and will aid in clinical integration. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-023-03126-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10105653/ /pubmed/36746792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03126-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Diagnostic Neuroradiology
Bhandari, Abhishta
Scott, Luke
Weilbach, Manuela
Marwah, Ravi
Lasocki, Arian
Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)
title Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)
title_full Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)
title_fullStr Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)
title_short Assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) reporting methodology in glioma MRI studies using the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM)
title_sort assessment of artificial intelligence (ai) reporting methodology in glioma mri studies using the checklist for ai in medical imaging (claim)
topic Diagnostic Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36746792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03126-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bhandariabhishta assessmentofartificialintelligenceaireportingmethodologyingliomamristudiesusingthechecklistforaiinmedicalimagingclaim
AT scottluke assessmentofartificialintelligenceaireportingmethodologyingliomamristudiesusingthechecklistforaiinmedicalimagingclaim
AT weilbachmanuela assessmentofartificialintelligenceaireportingmethodologyingliomamristudiesusingthechecklistforaiinmedicalimagingclaim
AT marwahravi assessmentofartificialintelligenceaireportingmethodologyingliomamristudiesusingthechecklistforaiinmedicalimagingclaim
AT lasockiarian assessmentofartificialintelligenceaireportingmethodologyingliomamristudiesusingthechecklistforaiinmedicalimagingclaim