Cargando…

A deep learning model using chest X-ray for identifying TB and NTM-LD patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Timely differentiating between pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD), which are radiographically similar, is important because infectiousness and treatment differ. This study aimed to evaluate whether artificial intelligence could distinguish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chia-Jung, Tsai, Cheng Che, Kuo, Lu-Cheng, Kuo, Po-Chih, Lee, Meng-Rui, Wang, Jann-Yuan, Ko, Jen-Chung, Shih, Jin-Yuan, Wang, Hao-Chien, Yu, Chong-Jen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37060419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01395-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Timely differentiating between pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD), which are radiographically similar, is important because infectiousness and treatment differ. This study aimed to evaluate whether artificial intelligence could distinguish between TB or NTM-LD patients by chest X-rays (CXRs) from suspects of mycobacterial lung disease. METHODS: A total of 1500 CXRs, including 500 each from patients with pulmonary TB, NTM-LD, and patients with clinical suspicion but negative mycobacterial culture (Imitator) from two hospitals, were retrospectively collected and evaluated in this study. We developed a deep neural network (DNN) and evaluated model performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) in both internal and external test sets. Furthermore, we conducted a reader study and tested our model under three scenarios of different mycobacteria prevalence. RESULTS: Among the internal and external test sets, the AUCs of our DNN model were 0.83 ± 0.005 and 0.76 ± 0.006 for pulmonary TB, 0.86 ± 0.006 and 0.64 ± 0.017 for NTM-LD, and 0.77 ± 0.007 and 0.74 ± 0.005 for Imitator. The DNN model showed higher performance on the internal test set in classification accuracy (66.5 ± 2.5%) than senior (50.8 ± 3.0%, p < 0.001) and junior pulmonologists (47.5 ± 2.8%, p < 0.001). Among different prevalence scenarios, the DNN model has stable performance in terms of AUC to detect TB and mycobacterial lung disease. CONCLUSION: DNN model had satisfactory performance and a higher accuracy than pulmonologists on classifying patients with presumptive mycobacterial lung diseases. DNN model could be a complementary first-line screening tool. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01395-9.