Cargando…

The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners

BACKGROUND: Digital workflow is showing an increasing tendency in everyday dentistry. Accuracy is essential during digital dental workflows for all indication areas. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of software updates on the accuracy of intraoral scanner (IOS) devices. METHODS: 3Shape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmalzl, Judit, Róth, Ivett, Borbély, Judit, Hermann, Péter, Vecsei, Bálint
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y
_version_ 1785026317511557120
author Schmalzl, Judit
Róth, Ivett
Borbély, Judit
Hermann, Péter
Vecsei, Bálint
author_facet Schmalzl, Judit
Róth, Ivett
Borbély, Judit
Hermann, Péter
Vecsei, Bálint
author_sort Schmalzl, Judit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital workflow is showing an increasing tendency in everyday dentistry. Accuracy is essential during digital dental workflows for all indication areas. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of software updates on the accuracy of intraoral scanner (IOS) devices. METHODS: 3Shape Trios 3 Pod with software versions 18.1.2. (TRI3_1) and 20.1.2. (TRI3_2); 3Shape Trios 4 Move, version 19.2.2. (TRI4_1); and 3Shape Trios 4 Pod, version 20.1.1. (TRI4_2) were used to take direct optical impressions from a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) full arch reference model with prepared teeth (FDI 11,14,17 for crowns and FDI 26 for onlay) and an edentulous region (between FDI 14 and 17). The scanners were used eight times; STL files were imported into Geomagic Control X for accuracy assessment by comparing them to a reference data set created by an industrial high-precision scanner (AICON SmartScan-3D C5). The average deviation of the surface points was calculated in three locations: across a full arch (Parameter 1), the region of a four-unit bridge (Parameter 2), and a single prepared abutment (Parameter 3). RESULTS: In parameter 1 and 2, the newest model with the latest software (TRI4_2) reached the highest accuracy (31.06 ± 5.24 µm and 21.69 ± 7.50 µm). In parameter 3, an older generation scanner running legacy software produced the highest accuracy: TRI4_1, 11.75 ± 0.35 µm. CONCLUSION: Appropriate software updates can significantly increase the trueness and precision of intraoral scanner devices. With updated software, the older generation can match the accuracy level of latest equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101059292023-04-17 The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners Schmalzl, Judit Róth, Ivett Borbély, Judit Hermann, Péter Vecsei, Bálint BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Digital workflow is showing an increasing tendency in everyday dentistry. Accuracy is essential during digital dental workflows for all indication areas. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of software updates on the accuracy of intraoral scanner (IOS) devices. METHODS: 3Shape Trios 3 Pod with software versions 18.1.2. (TRI3_1) and 20.1.2. (TRI3_2); 3Shape Trios 4 Move, version 19.2.2. (TRI4_1); and 3Shape Trios 4 Pod, version 20.1.1. (TRI4_2) were used to take direct optical impressions from a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) full arch reference model with prepared teeth (FDI 11,14,17 for crowns and FDI 26 for onlay) and an edentulous region (between FDI 14 and 17). The scanners were used eight times; STL files were imported into Geomagic Control X for accuracy assessment by comparing them to a reference data set created by an industrial high-precision scanner (AICON SmartScan-3D C5). The average deviation of the surface points was calculated in three locations: across a full arch (Parameter 1), the region of a four-unit bridge (Parameter 2), and a single prepared abutment (Parameter 3). RESULTS: In parameter 1 and 2, the newest model with the latest software (TRI4_2) reached the highest accuracy (31.06 ± 5.24 µm and 21.69 ± 7.50 µm). In parameter 3, an older generation scanner running legacy software produced the highest accuracy: TRI4_1, 11.75 ± 0.35 µm. CONCLUSION: Appropriate software updates can significantly increase the trueness and precision of intraoral scanner devices. With updated software, the older generation can match the accuracy level of latest equipment. BioMed Central 2023-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10105929/ /pubmed/37061664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schmalzl, Judit
Róth, Ivett
Borbély, Judit
Hermann, Péter
Vecsei, Bálint
The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
title The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
title_full The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
title_fullStr The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
title_full_unstemmed The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
title_short The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
title_sort impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y
work_keys_str_mv AT schmalzljudit theimpactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT rothivett theimpactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT borbelyjudit theimpactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT hermannpeter theimpactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT vecseibalint theimpactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT schmalzljudit impactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT rothivett impactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT borbelyjudit impactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT hermannpeter impactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners
AT vecseibalint impactofsoftwareupdatesonaccuracyofintraoralscanners