Cargando…

Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: No studies have focused on cortical anchorage resistance in cuspids, this study aimed to characterize the cortical anchorage according to sagittal skeletal classes using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: CBCT images of 104 men and 104 women were divided into skeletal class I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Xiaoyu, Lin, Yaqi, Zhang, Guanning, Zheng, Jiawen, Zhang, Lanxin, Yang, Yuqing, Zhao, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02912-4
_version_ 1785026324650262528
author Wei, Xiaoyu
Lin, Yaqi
Zhang, Guanning
Zheng, Jiawen
Zhang, Lanxin
Yang, Yuqing
Zhao, Qing
author_facet Wei, Xiaoyu
Lin, Yaqi
Zhang, Guanning
Zheng, Jiawen
Zhang, Lanxin
Yang, Yuqing
Zhao, Qing
author_sort Wei, Xiaoyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No studies have focused on cortical anchorage resistance in cuspids, this study aimed to characterize the cortical anchorage according to sagittal skeletal classes using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: CBCT images of 104 men and 104 women were divided into skeletal class I, II, and III malocclusion groups. Skeletal and dental evaluations were performed on the sagittal and axial cross-sections. One-way analysis of variance followed by least significant difference post-hoc tests was used for group differences. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between influential factors and cuspid cortical anchorage. RESULTS: All cuspids were close to the labial bone cortex in different sagittal skeletal patterns and had different inclinations. There was a significant difference in the apical root position of cuspids in the alveolar bone; however, no significant difference in the middle or cervical portions of the root was found between different sagittal facial patterns. The middle of the cuspid root was embedded to the greatest extent in the labial bone cortex, with no significant difference between the sagittal patterns. For all sagittal patterns, 6.03 ± 4.41° (men) and 6.08 ± 4.45° (women) may be appropriate root control angles to keep maxillary cuspids’ roots detached from the labial bone cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of skeletal class I, II, and III malocclusion patients showed that dental compensation alleviated sagittal skeletal discrepancies in the cuspid positions of all patients, regardless of the malocclusion class. Detailed treatment procedures and clear treatment boundaries of cuspids with different skeletal patterns can improve the treatment time, periodontal bone remodeling, and post-treatment long-term stability. Future studies on cuspids with different dentofacial patterns and considering cuspid morphology and periodontal condition may provide more evidence for clinical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10105966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101059662023-04-17 Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study Wei, Xiaoyu Lin, Yaqi Zhang, Guanning Zheng, Jiawen Zhang, Lanxin Yang, Yuqing Zhao, Qing BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: No studies have focused on cortical anchorage resistance in cuspids, this study aimed to characterize the cortical anchorage according to sagittal skeletal classes using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: CBCT images of 104 men and 104 women were divided into skeletal class I, II, and III malocclusion groups. Skeletal and dental evaluations were performed on the sagittal and axial cross-sections. One-way analysis of variance followed by least significant difference post-hoc tests was used for group differences. Multiple linear regression was performed to evaluate the relationship between influential factors and cuspid cortical anchorage. RESULTS: All cuspids were close to the labial bone cortex in different sagittal skeletal patterns and had different inclinations. There was a significant difference in the apical root position of cuspids in the alveolar bone; however, no significant difference in the middle or cervical portions of the root was found between different sagittal facial patterns. The middle of the cuspid root was embedded to the greatest extent in the labial bone cortex, with no significant difference between the sagittal patterns. For all sagittal patterns, 6.03 ± 4.41° (men) and 6.08 ± 4.45° (women) may be appropriate root control angles to keep maxillary cuspids’ roots detached from the labial bone cortex. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of skeletal class I, II, and III malocclusion patients showed that dental compensation alleviated sagittal skeletal discrepancies in the cuspid positions of all patients, regardless of the malocclusion class. Detailed treatment procedures and clear treatment boundaries of cuspids with different skeletal patterns can improve the treatment time, periodontal bone remodeling, and post-treatment long-term stability. Future studies on cuspids with different dentofacial patterns and considering cuspid morphology and periodontal condition may provide more evidence for clinical treatment. BioMed Central 2023-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10105966/ /pubmed/37061704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02912-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wei, Xiaoyu
Lin, Yaqi
Zhang, Guanning
Zheng, Jiawen
Zhang, Lanxin
Yang, Yuqing
Zhao, Qing
Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
title Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
title_full Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
title_short Evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
title_sort evaluation of cuspid cortical anchorage with different sagittal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography: a retrospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02912-4
work_keys_str_mv AT weixiaoyu evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT linyaqi evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangguanning evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhengjiawen evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhanglanxin evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT yangyuqing evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhaoqing evaluationofcuspidcorticalanchoragewithdifferentsagittalpatternsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyaretrospectivestudy