Cargando…

Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE: Historically, neurology research has demonstrated a sex bias with mainly male subjects included in clinical trials as well as lack of reporting of data by sex. In recent years, emphasis has been placed on increased participation of female participants and explicit declaration/evaluation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moores, Ginette, Steadman, Patrick E, Momen, Amirah, Wolff, Elena, Pikula, Aleksandra, Bui, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071200
_version_ 1785026331166113792
author Moores, Ginette
Steadman, Patrick E
Momen, Amirah
Wolff, Elena
Pikula, Aleksandra
Bui, Esther
author_facet Moores, Ginette
Steadman, Patrick E
Momen, Amirah
Wolff, Elena
Pikula, Aleksandra
Bui, Esther
author_sort Moores, Ginette
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Historically, neurology research has demonstrated a sex bias with mainly male subjects included in clinical trials as well as lack of reporting of data by sex. In recent years, emphasis has been placed on increased participation of female participants and explicit declaration/evaluation of sex differences in clinical research. We aimed to review the available literature examining sex differences across four subspecialty areas in neurology (demyelination, headache, stroke, epilepsy) and whether sex and gender terms have been used appropriately. DESIGN: This scoping review was performed by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Ovid Emcare and APA PsycINFO databases from 2014 to 2020. Four independent pairs of reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Studies whose primary objective was to assess sex or gender differences among adults with one of four neurological conditions were included. We report the scope, content and trends of previous studies that have evaluated sex differences in neurology. RESULTS: The search retrieved 22 745 articles. Five hundred and eighty-five studies met the inclusion criteria in the review. The majority of studies were observational, often examining similar concepts designed for a different country or regional population, with rare randomised controlled trials designed specifically to assess sex differences in neurology. There was heterogeneity observed in areas of sex-specific focus between the four subspecialty areas. Thirty-six per cent (n=212) of articles used the terms sex and gender interchangeably or incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: Sex and gender are important biological and social determinants of health. However, the more explicit recognition of these factors in clinical literature has not been adequately translated to significant change in neuroscience research regarding sex differences. This study illustrates the ongoing need for more urgent informed action to recognise and act on sex differences in scientific discovery and correct the use of sex and gender terminology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this scoping review was registered with Open Science Framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10106015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101060152023-04-17 Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review Moores, Ginette Steadman, Patrick E Momen, Amirah Wolff, Elena Pikula, Aleksandra Bui, Esther BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVE: Historically, neurology research has demonstrated a sex bias with mainly male subjects included in clinical trials as well as lack of reporting of data by sex. In recent years, emphasis has been placed on increased participation of female participants and explicit declaration/evaluation of sex differences in clinical research. We aimed to review the available literature examining sex differences across four subspecialty areas in neurology (demyelination, headache, stroke, epilepsy) and whether sex and gender terms have been used appropriately. DESIGN: This scoping review was performed by searching Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Ovid Emcare and APA PsycINFO databases from 2014 to 2020. Four independent pairs of reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts. Studies whose primary objective was to assess sex or gender differences among adults with one of four neurological conditions were included. We report the scope, content and trends of previous studies that have evaluated sex differences in neurology. RESULTS: The search retrieved 22 745 articles. Five hundred and eighty-five studies met the inclusion criteria in the review. The majority of studies were observational, often examining similar concepts designed for a different country or regional population, with rare randomised controlled trials designed specifically to assess sex differences in neurology. There was heterogeneity observed in areas of sex-specific focus between the four subspecialty areas. Thirty-six per cent (n=212) of articles used the terms sex and gender interchangeably or incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: Sex and gender are important biological and social determinants of health. However, the more explicit recognition of these factors in clinical literature has not been adequately translated to significant change in neuroscience research regarding sex differences. This study illustrates the ongoing need for more urgent informed action to recognise and act on sex differences in scientific discovery and correct the use of sex and gender terminology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol for this scoping review was registered with Open Science Framework. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10106015/ /pubmed/37041049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071200 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Neurology
Moores, Ginette
Steadman, Patrick E
Momen, Amirah
Wolff, Elena
Pikula, Aleksandra
Bui, Esther
Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
title Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
title_full Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
title_fullStr Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
title_short Sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
title_sort sex differences in neurology: a scoping review
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071200
work_keys_str_mv AT mooresginette sexdifferencesinneurologyascopingreview
AT steadmanpatricke sexdifferencesinneurologyascopingreview
AT momenamirah sexdifferencesinneurologyascopingreview
AT wolffelena sexdifferencesinneurologyascopingreview
AT pikulaaleksandra sexdifferencesinneurologyascopingreview
AT buiesther sexdifferencesinneurologyascopingreview