Cargando…
Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Quality assessment in the context of maternal health services in Brazil has been the object of study due to maternal mortality rates that remain high in the country, in addition to the high costs of healthcare and the increased level of complexity in care. To change this situation, sev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009 |
_version_ | 1785026332381413376 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Dannielly Azevedo Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Cabral, Beatriz Tavina Viana Lira Lisboa, Lilian Nobre, Thaiza Teixeira Xavier |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Dannielly Azevedo Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Cabral, Beatriz Tavina Viana Lira Lisboa, Lilian Nobre, Thaiza Teixeira Xavier |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Dannielly Azevedo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Quality assessment in the context of maternal health services in Brazil has been the object of study due to maternal mortality rates that remain high in the country, in addition to the high costs of healthcare and the increased level of complexity in care. To change this situation, several strategies have been proposed to improve care for women. One of them is the improvement of women’s access to maternal and child services through the Reception with Obstetric Risk Classification (ACCRO). OBJECTIVE: To map and synthesise scientific evidence in the literature of studies that assess the quality of ACCRO services from the perspective of users, professionals and managers, as well as map tools that assess the quality of these services and their results. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: It is a scoping protocol that follows the method recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute, other authors and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The Population, Concept and Context strategy will systematise the search in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS, SCOPUS and Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. For the grey literature search: Google Scholar, Theses and Dissertations Bank of the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology, Federated Network of Institutional Repositories of Scientific Publications, Online Theses Electronic Service, Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal, Academic Archive Online. Searches and application of selection criteria will be performed according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. The articles will be selected from the Web Rayyan platform, the results will be analysed and presented in a narrative and thematically organised way. This scoping review is expected to contribute to the feasibility of assessing the quality of ACCRO services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal. This protocol has been registered with OSF (https://osf.io/sp5df). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10106020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101060202023-04-17 Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol de Oliveira, Dannielly Azevedo Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Cabral, Beatriz Tavina Viana Lira Lisboa, Lilian Nobre, Thaiza Teixeira Xavier BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Quality assessment in the context of maternal health services in Brazil has been the object of study due to maternal mortality rates that remain high in the country, in addition to the high costs of healthcare and the increased level of complexity in care. To change this situation, several strategies have been proposed to improve care for women. One of them is the improvement of women’s access to maternal and child services through the Reception with Obstetric Risk Classification (ACCRO). OBJECTIVE: To map and synthesise scientific evidence in the literature of studies that assess the quality of ACCRO services from the perspective of users, professionals and managers, as well as map tools that assess the quality of these services and their results. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: It is a scoping protocol that follows the method recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute, other authors and guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The Population, Concept and Context strategy will systematise the search in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, LILACS, SCOPUS and Web of Science and PsycINFO databases. For the grey literature search: Google Scholar, Theses and Dissertations Bank of the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology, Federated Network of Institutional Repositories of Scientific Publications, Online Theses Electronic Service, Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal, Academic Archive Online. Searches and application of selection criteria will be performed according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. The articles will be selected from the Web Rayyan platform, the results will be analysed and presented in a narrative and thematically organised way. This scoping review is expected to contribute to the feasibility of assessing the quality of ACCRO services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal. This protocol has been registered with OSF (https://osf.io/sp5df). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10106020/ /pubmed/37045575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Public Health de Oliveira, Dannielly Azevedo Medeiros, Joyanne de Souza Cabral, Beatriz Tavina Viana Lira Lisboa, Lilian Nobre, Thaiza Teixeira Xavier Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
title | Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | assessment of the quality of services of reception with risk classification in obstetrics: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiradanniellyazevedo assessmentofthequalityofservicesofreceptionwithriskclassificationinobstetricsascopingreviewprotocol AT medeirosjoyannedesouza assessmentofthequalityofservicesofreceptionwithriskclassificationinobstetricsascopingreviewprotocol AT cabralbeatriztavinaviana assessmentofthequalityofservicesofreceptionwithriskclassificationinobstetricsascopingreviewprotocol AT liralisboalilian assessmentofthequalityofservicesofreceptionwithriskclassificationinobstetricsascopingreviewprotocol AT nobrethaizateixeiraxavier assessmentofthequalityofservicesofreceptionwithriskclassificationinobstetricsascopingreviewprotocol |