Cargando…
Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
OBJECTIVES: Develop an understanding of the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) about their role in postnatal care, including barriers and facilitators to good care, and timing and content of planned postnatal checks. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005 |
_version_ | 1785026339917529088 |
---|---|
author | Macdonald, Clare MacGregor, Becky Hillman, Sarah MacArthur, Christine Bick, Debra Taylor, Beck |
author_facet | Macdonald, Clare MacGregor, Becky Hillman, Sarah MacArthur, Christine Bick, Debra Taylor, Beck |
author_sort | Macdonald, Clare |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Develop an understanding of the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) about their role in postnatal care, including barriers and facilitators to good care, and timing and content of planned postnatal checks. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO from January 1990 to September 2021. Grey literature and guideline references from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, WHO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Papers reporting qualitative data on views and experiences of GPs about postnatal care, including discrete clinical conditions in the postnatal period. Papers were screened independently by two reviewers and disputes resolved by a third reviewer. QUALITY APPRAISAL: The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Thematic synthesis involving line-by-line coding, generation of descriptive then analytical themes was conducted by the review team. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to develop analytical themes. RESULTS: 20 reports from 18 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were published from 2008 to 2021, reporting on 469 GPs. 13 were from UK or Australia. Some also reported views of non-GP participants. The clinical focus of studies varied, for example: perinatal mental health, postnatal contraception. Five themes were generated, four mapped to COM-B: psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity and motivation. One theme was separate from the COM-B model: content and timing of postnatal checks. Strong influences were in physical and social opportunity, with time and organisation of services being heavily represented. These factors sometimes influenced findings in the motivation theme. CONCLUSIONS: GPs perceived their role in postnatal care as a positive opportunity for relationship building and health promotion. Addressing organisational barriers could impact positively on GPs’ motivation to provide the best care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 268982. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10106050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101060502023-04-17 Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care Macdonald, Clare MacGregor, Becky Hillman, Sarah MacArthur, Christine Bick, Debra Taylor, Beck BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Develop an understanding of the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) about their role in postnatal care, including barriers and facilitators to good care, and timing and content of planned postnatal checks. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO from January 1990 to September 2021. Grey literature and guideline references from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, WHO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Papers reporting qualitative data on views and experiences of GPs about postnatal care, including discrete clinical conditions in the postnatal period. Papers were screened independently by two reviewers and disputes resolved by a third reviewer. QUALITY APPRAISAL: The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Thematic synthesis involving line-by-line coding, generation of descriptive then analytical themes was conducted by the review team. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to develop analytical themes. RESULTS: 20 reports from 18 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were published from 2008 to 2021, reporting on 469 GPs. 13 were from UK or Australia. Some also reported views of non-GP participants. The clinical focus of studies varied, for example: perinatal mental health, postnatal contraception. Five themes were generated, four mapped to COM-B: psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity and motivation. One theme was separate from the COM-B model: content and timing of postnatal checks. Strong influences were in physical and social opportunity, with time and organisation of services being heavily represented. These factors sometimes influenced findings in the motivation theme. CONCLUSIONS: GPs perceived their role in postnatal care as a positive opportunity for relationship building and health promotion. Addressing organisational barriers could impact positively on GPs’ motivation to provide the best care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 268982. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10106050/ /pubmed/37045584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Macdonald, Clare MacGregor, Becky Hillman, Sarah MacArthur, Christine Bick, Debra Taylor, Beck Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
title | Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
title_full | Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
title_fullStr | Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
title_short | Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
title_sort | qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (gps’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macdonaldclare qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare AT macgregorbecky qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare AT hillmansarah qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare AT macarthurchristine qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare AT bickdebra qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare AT taylorbeck qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare |