Cargando…

Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care

OBJECTIVES: Develop an understanding of the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) about their role in postnatal care, including barriers and facilitators to good care, and timing and content of planned postnatal checks. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macdonald, Clare, MacGregor, Becky, Hillman, Sarah, MacArthur, Christine, Bick, Debra, Taylor, Beck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005
_version_ 1785026339917529088
author Macdonald, Clare
MacGregor, Becky
Hillman, Sarah
MacArthur, Christine
Bick, Debra
Taylor, Beck
author_facet Macdonald, Clare
MacGregor, Becky
Hillman, Sarah
MacArthur, Christine
Bick, Debra
Taylor, Beck
author_sort Macdonald, Clare
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Develop an understanding of the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) about their role in postnatal care, including barriers and facilitators to good care, and timing and content of planned postnatal checks. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO from January 1990 to September 2021. Grey literature and guideline references from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, WHO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Papers reporting qualitative data on views and experiences of GPs about postnatal care, including discrete clinical conditions in the postnatal period. Papers were screened independently by two reviewers and disputes resolved by a third reviewer. QUALITY APPRAISAL: The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Thematic synthesis involving line-by-line coding, generation of descriptive then analytical themes was conducted by the review team. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to develop analytical themes. RESULTS: 20 reports from 18 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were published from 2008 to 2021, reporting on 469 GPs. 13 were from UK or Australia. Some also reported views of non-GP participants. The clinical focus of studies varied, for example: perinatal mental health, postnatal contraception. Five themes were generated, four mapped to COM-B: psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity and motivation. One theme was separate from the COM-B model: content and timing of postnatal checks. Strong influences were in physical and social opportunity, with time and organisation of services being heavily represented. These factors sometimes influenced findings in the motivation theme. CONCLUSIONS: GPs perceived their role in postnatal care as a positive opportunity for relationship building and health promotion. Addressing organisational barriers could impact positively on GPs’ motivation to provide the best care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 268982.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10106050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101060502023-04-17 Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care Macdonald, Clare MacGregor, Becky Hillman, Sarah MacArthur, Christine Bick, Debra Taylor, Beck BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Develop an understanding of the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) about their role in postnatal care, including barriers and facilitators to good care, and timing and content of planned postnatal checks. DESIGN: Qualitative systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO from January 1990 to September 2021. Grey literature and guideline references from National Institute of Health and Care Excellence, WHO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Papers reporting qualitative data on views and experiences of GPs about postnatal care, including discrete clinical conditions in the postnatal period. Papers were screened independently by two reviewers and disputes resolved by a third reviewer. QUALITY APPRAISAL: The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Thematic synthesis involving line-by-line coding, generation of descriptive then analytical themes was conducted by the review team. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model was used to develop analytical themes. RESULTS: 20 reports from 18 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were published from 2008 to 2021, reporting on 469 GPs. 13 were from UK or Australia. Some also reported views of non-GP participants. The clinical focus of studies varied, for example: perinatal mental health, postnatal contraception. Five themes were generated, four mapped to COM-B: psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity and motivation. One theme was separate from the COM-B model: content and timing of postnatal checks. Strong influences were in physical and social opportunity, with time and organisation of services being heavily represented. These factors sometimes influenced findings in the motivation theme. CONCLUSIONS: GPs perceived their role in postnatal care as a positive opportunity for relationship building and health promotion. Addressing organisational barriers could impact positively on GPs’ motivation to provide the best care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: 268982. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10106050/ /pubmed/37045584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Macdonald, Clare
MacGregor, Becky
Hillman, Sarah
MacArthur, Christine
Bick, Debra
Taylor, Beck
Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
title Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
title_full Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
title_fullStr Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
title_short Qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
title_sort qualitative systematic review of general practitioners’ (gps’) views and experiences of providing postnatal care
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37045584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070005
work_keys_str_mv AT macdonaldclare qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare
AT macgregorbecky qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare
AT hillmansarah qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare
AT macarthurchristine qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare
AT bickdebra qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare
AT taylorbeck qualitativesystematicreviewofgeneralpractitionersgpsviewsandexperiencesofprovidingpostnatalcare