Cargando…
Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Medical devices, including high-risk medical devices, have greatly contributed to recent improvements in the management of diabetes. However, the clinical evidence that is submitted for regulatory approval is not transparent, and thus a comprehensive summary of the evidence for high-ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070672 |
_version_ | 1785026340157652992 |
---|---|
author | Bano, Arjola Laimer, Markus Wehrli, Faina Kunzler, Juri Rivero, Tania Fraser, Alan G Stettler, Christoph Hovorka, Roman Bally, Lia |
author_facet | Bano, Arjola Laimer, Markus Wehrli, Faina Kunzler, Juri Rivero, Tania Fraser, Alan G Stettler, Christoph Hovorka, Roman Bally, Lia |
author_sort | Bano, Arjola |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Medical devices, including high-risk medical devices, have greatly contributed to recent improvements in the management of diabetes. However, the clinical evidence that is submitted for regulatory approval is not transparent, and thus a comprehensive summary of the evidence for high-risk devices approved for managing diabetes in Europe is lacking. In the framework of the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices group, we will, therefore, perform a systematic review and meta-analysis, which will evaluate the efficacy, safety and usability of high-risk medical devices for the management of diabetes. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This study has been reported according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will search Embase (Elsevier), Medline All (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Science Citation Index Expanded and Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) to identify interventional and observational studies that evaluate the efficacy and/or safety and/or usability of high-risk medical devices for the management of diabetes. No language or publication dates’ limits will be applied. Animal studies will be excluded. In accordance with the Medical Device Regulation in European Union, high-risk medical devices are those in classes IIb and III. The following medical devices for diabetes management are considered as having a high risk: implantable continuous glucose monitoring systems, implantable pumps and automated insulin delivery devices. Selection of studies, data extraction and quality of evidence assessment will be performed independently by two researchers. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify and explain potential heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is needed for this systematic review, as it is based in already published data. Our findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022366871. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10106051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101060512023-04-17 Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Bano, Arjola Laimer, Markus Wehrli, Faina Kunzler, Juri Rivero, Tania Fraser, Alan G Stettler, Christoph Hovorka, Roman Bally, Lia BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Medical devices, including high-risk medical devices, have greatly contributed to recent improvements in the management of diabetes. However, the clinical evidence that is submitted for regulatory approval is not transparent, and thus a comprehensive summary of the evidence for high-risk devices approved for managing diabetes in Europe is lacking. In the framework of the Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices group, we will, therefore, perform a systematic review and meta-analysis, which will evaluate the efficacy, safety and usability of high-risk medical devices for the management of diabetes. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This study has been reported according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. We will search Embase (Elsevier), Medline All (Ovid), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Science Citation Index Expanded and Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science) to identify interventional and observational studies that evaluate the efficacy and/or safety and/or usability of high-risk medical devices for the management of diabetes. No language or publication dates’ limits will be applied. Animal studies will be excluded. In accordance with the Medical Device Regulation in European Union, high-risk medical devices are those in classes IIb and III. The following medical devices for diabetes management are considered as having a high risk: implantable continuous glucose monitoring systems, implantable pumps and automated insulin delivery devices. Selection of studies, data extraction and quality of evidence assessment will be performed independently by two researchers. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify and explain potential heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is needed for this systematic review, as it is based in already published data. Our findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022366871. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10106051/ /pubmed/37041065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070672 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Diabetes and Endocrinology Bano, Arjola Laimer, Markus Wehrli, Faina Kunzler, Juri Rivero, Tania Fraser, Alan G Stettler, Christoph Hovorka, Roman Bally, Lia Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices used to manage diabetes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Diabetes and Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37041065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070672 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT banoarjola clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT laimermarkus clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wehrlifaina clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kunzlerjuri clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT riverotania clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fraseralang clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stettlerchristoph clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hovorkaroman clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ballylia clinicalevidenceforhighriskmedicaldevicesusedtomanagediabetesprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |