Cargando…
Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is increasingly used in the treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, about 15% of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) cases report non-curative resection. The efficacy of different remedial interventions after non-curative ESD for EGC remains controversi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002605 |
_version_ | 1785026376222375936 |
---|---|
author | Li, Sixuan Tian, Xueli Wei, Jingyao Shi, Yanyan Zhang, Hua Huang, Yonghui |
author_facet | Li, Sixuan Tian, Xueli Wei, Jingyao Shi, Yanyan Zhang, Hua Huang, Yonghui |
author_sort | Li, Sixuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is increasingly used in the treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, about 15% of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) cases report non-curative resection. The efficacy of different remedial interventions after non-curative ESD for EGC remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of additional surgery and non-gastrectomy treatment for EGC patients who underwent non-curative ESD. METHODS: All relevant studies published up to October 2021 were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The medical subject headings terms “early gastric cancer,” “gastrectomy,” “endoscopic submucosal dissection,” and their related free keywords were used to search relevant articles without restrictions on regions, publication types, or languages. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of OS were calculated using a random- or fixed-effects model. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 17 retrospective cohort studies with 5880 patients, of whom 3167 underwent additional surgery and 2713 underwent non-gastrectomy. We found that patients receiving additional gastrectomy had better 5-year OS (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 3.05–4.31), DSS (OR = 3.22, 95% CI = 2.22–4.66), and DFS (OR = 4.39, 95% CI = 1.78–10.82) outcomes than those receiving non-gastrectomy treatments. The pooled HR also showed that gastrectomy following non-curative ESD significantly improved OS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33–0.48). In addition, elderly patients benefited from additional surgery in consideration of the 5-year OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41–0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-gastrectomy treatments, additional surgery offered better long-term survival outcomes for patients with EGC who underwent non-curative ESD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10106195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101061952023-04-17 Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis Li, Sixuan Tian, Xueli Wei, Jingyao Shi, Yanyan Zhang, Hua Huang, Yonghui Chin Med J (Engl) Meta Analysis BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection is increasingly used in the treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, about 15% of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) cases report non-curative resection. The efficacy of different remedial interventions after non-curative ESD for EGC remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of additional surgery and non-gastrectomy treatment for EGC patients who underwent non-curative ESD. METHODS: All relevant studies published up to October 2021 were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The medical subject headings terms “early gastric cancer,” “gastrectomy,” “endoscopic submucosal dissection,” and their related free keywords were used to search relevant articles without restrictions on regions, publication types, or languages. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of OS were calculated using a random- or fixed-effects model. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 17 retrospective cohort studies with 5880 patients, of whom 3167 underwent additional surgery and 2713 underwent non-gastrectomy. We found that patients receiving additional gastrectomy had better 5-year OS (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 3.05–4.31), DSS (OR = 3.22, 95% CI = 2.22–4.66), and DFS (OR = 4.39, 95% CI = 1.78–10.82) outcomes than those receiving non-gastrectomy treatments. The pooled HR also showed that gastrectomy following non-curative ESD significantly improved OS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33–0.48). In addition, elderly patients benefited from additional surgery in consideration of the 5-year OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41–0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-gastrectomy treatments, additional surgery offered better long-term survival outcomes for patients with EGC who underwent non-curative ESD. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-03-05 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10106195/ /pubmed/36914940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002605 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Meta Analysis Li, Sixuan Tian, Xueli Wei, Jingyao Shi, Yanyan Zhang, Hua Huang, Yonghui Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
title | Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36914940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002605 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisixuan longtermoutcomesofadditionalsurgeryversusnongastrectomytreatmentforearlygastriccancerafternoncurativeendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionametaanalysis AT tianxueli longtermoutcomesofadditionalsurgeryversusnongastrectomytreatmentforearlygastriccancerafternoncurativeendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionametaanalysis AT weijingyao longtermoutcomesofadditionalsurgeryversusnongastrectomytreatmentforearlygastriccancerafternoncurativeendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionametaanalysis AT shiyanyan longtermoutcomesofadditionalsurgeryversusnongastrectomytreatmentforearlygastriccancerafternoncurativeendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionametaanalysis AT zhanghua longtermoutcomesofadditionalsurgeryversusnongastrectomytreatmentforearlygastriccancerafternoncurativeendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionametaanalysis AT huangyonghui longtermoutcomesofadditionalsurgeryversusnongastrectomytreatmentforearlygastriccancerafternoncurativeendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionametaanalysis |