Cargando…
Is t(11;14)(q13;q32) good or bad for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
Autores principales: | Liu, Yang, Gao, Lu, Lai, Yueyun, Wen, Lei, Duan, Wenbing, Wang, Fengrong, Ma, Ling, Huang, Xiaojun, Lu, Jin |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10106196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36728296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002159 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Translocation t(11;14) (q13;q32) and genomic imbalances in multi-ethnic multiple myeloma patients: a Malaysian study
por: Ni, Ivyna Bong Pau, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
The CCND1 870G>A polymorphism is a risk factor for t(11;14)(q13;q32) multiple myeloma
por: Weinhold, Niels, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Venetoclax in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma harboring t(11,14)(q13;q32): two case reports and a review of the literature
por: Abuelgasim, Khadega A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
CD20 expression: A risk stratification factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with t(11;14)
por: Jian, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Plasma cell leukemia with t(11;14)(q13;q32) simulating lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma – a diagnostic challenge solved by flow cytometry
por: Loureiro, Aleyde Diniz, et al.
Publicado: (2017)